It's Time to Impeach and Remove: YouTube - US spokesman responds to spy claims/hard evidence

Government Liars

How do you spell squirming? Well, I know how to spell lying. The State Department cable illegally ordered diplomats to illegally spy. There is zero question about it. It's prima fascia. P. J. Crowley {Philip J. (P.J.) Crowley} is flat out lying. He's being paid to do it. He's a hired liar. He was told to do it, and he's shown doing it there in the video (below).

Hillary Clinton Knew Honduras Had a Military Coup

He's shown ducking the direct questions concerning the Honduran coup against Manuel Zelaya. The U.S. government, the State Department, the Obama administration, all knew that it was an illegal coup in which the Honduran military engaged without doubt.

As the alternative press at the time was saying, as I was saying at the time, the State Department deliberately avoided calling it an illegal coup and a military coup (which everyone knows it was, including Hillary Clinton and all of her State Department lawyers) because the law required the U.S. cut off the coupsters and military.

Pass Time to Impeach and Remove the Unrepentant Criminal, Barack Obama

The U.S. government, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and many, many others lied about this in clear violation of the law and the President should be impeached and removed from office on account of it. It does constitute high crimes and misdemeanors. His administration should be swept out.

Clearly though, the Honduran example is far, far, far from the only case in which the same lawless leadership has committed and continues to commit high crimes and misdemeanors for which they all should be removed from office.

Assange and WikiLeaks Under Attack by Lying Serpents

Julian Assange and WikiLeaks are under attack for bringing these horrendous crimes to light. Assange and WikiLeaks are the true heroes. People such as U.S. Senator Joe Lieberman are biting, venomous snakes who have no business in public office at any level.

This major obfuscator, twister, fellow snake with Joe Lieberman, P. J. Crowley, claims that Julian Assange is trying to undermine the system whereby the U.S. works to solve problems.

WikiLeaks Undermining Illegal Regimes, Including U.S.

Julian Assange is undermining the system whereby the lying, cheating, stealing, mass murdering, covetous, lawless system goes about self-enriching its elitist masters at the direct negative expense of everyone else on the planet, even the planet itself. P. J. Crowley's proud of that?

He's criminally insane; but by that, I don't mean he's not responsible for his terrible choices and should not be held to account for them.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in WikiLeaks. Bookmark the permalink.