Police Seize Weapons from Libertarian-Capitalist who Praised Gifffords Shooting: 1 Down and 534 to go

Police in Arlington, MA this week seized a "large amount" of weapons and ammunition from local businessman Travis Corcoran after he wrote a blog post threatening U.S. lawmakers in the wake of the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ). In a post on his blog (which has since been removed) titled "1 down and 534 to go" — 1 referring to Giffords and 534 referring to the rest of the House of Representatives and the Senate — Corcoran applauded the shooting of Giffords and justified the assassination of lawmakers because he argued the federal government has grown far beyond its constitutional limits. "It is absolutely, absolutely unacceptable to shoot indiscriminately. Target only politicians and their staff and leave regular citizens alone," he wrote in the post.


ThinkProgress » Police Seize 'Large Amount' Of Weapons From Blogger Who Praised Gifffords Shooting: '1 Down And 534 To Go'.

This one, Travis Corcoran, is not, I repeat, is not a leftist at all! He is an anarcho-capitalist. If you don't know what one of those is, check out "Murray Rothbard."

I've written often about the insanity that is anarcho-capitalism. It is the combining of anarchism and capitalism. It's laissez-faire on steroids. It claims that all disputes can be handled via courts except when they can't. Then it is acceptable, even obligatory, to get your gun and go with your "club for protection" (think citizen posse or more so lynch mob) eliminate those who stand in the way of governmentless capitalism.

This is why I've been writing that libertarian capitalism is a one-way ticket to a total monopoly by one person who would be the one who manages to control the whole planet via his control of mammon. It's the farthest thing from freedom or liberty imaginable because the heart that can accomplish that amassing and hoarding just will not be capable of being truly beneficial or bountiful. He will rather be the churl of churls, who is the exact opposite of the Christ spirit who is Jesus.

Now the name of the man was Nabal; and the name of his wife Abigail: and she was a woman of good understanding, and of a beautiful countenance: but the man was churlish and evil in his doings; and he was of the house of Caleb. (1 Samuel 25:3 KJV)

The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said to be bountiful. For the vile person will speak villany, and his heart will work iniquity, to practise hypocrisy, and to utter error against the LORD, to make empty the soul of the hungry, and he will cause the drink of the thirsty to fail. The instruments also of the churl are evil: he deviseth wicked devices to destroy the poor with lying words, even when the needy speaketh right. But the liberal deviseth liberal things; and by liberal things shall he stand. (Isaiah 32:5-8 KJV)

The anarcho-capitalist has at his core the heart of Nabal. He may feign liberalism, but he is first and foremost for self apart from God. This is why I have referred to all anarcho-capitalists as anti-Christs.

Anarcho-capitalists or libertarian capitalists have their roots running through the whole Austrian School of economics. The Austrian School is decidedly anti-Christ. Its founders included not a single Christian; however, you now have thousands of deceived individuals claiming to be Christians and anarcho-capitalists at the same time. It isn't possible. There is no such thing as a Christian anarcho-capitalist!

Ron Paul, for instance, claims to be a Christian libertarian-capitalist. He is totally mistaken about it. You can include the CATO Institute and the Ludwig von Mises Institute and Lew Rockwell and many, many others in this apostate group. The Koch brothers are instrumental in it, as they fund the CATO Institute in large measure and the vacuous Tea Party, with wings that are both neocon (Sarah Palin) and anti-neocon (Ron Paul).

Here are the last cached (Google) public tweets to Laura Leslie (@LauraLeslie; http://twitter.com/#!/LauraLeslie; http://www.wral.com/rs/bio/8970525/) by Travis Corcoran put in paragraph style (http://twitter.com/#!/tjic):

...lives? Better to assasinate Hitler than firebomb Dresden, yes? I assert that the US federal gov has grown unconstitutionally large, and the legislature exceeds the powers delegated to it by the people in Article I Section 8. ROUTINELY. Thus, the gov has grown destructive to the very ends that it was established to create. Thus, it is legitimate to attempt to abolish or reform it. ...and the most moral approach is that which spares the maximum number of lives. Thus, assasination is a legitimate tool, in some circumstances, AND we may - or may not - be in those circumstances now. Now, under a close reading of Catholic Just War doctrine, I think that we are prob not. There is not a good chance of restraining or rolling back gov abuses, and there is a very good chance of causing lots of damage. Witness the poor girl who got shot. My blog is - to some degree - political theater (with a very serious anarchocapitalist theme), and thus long time readers understand that "1 down, X to go" COMBINED with my strong assertion that innocents must be protected is (a) entirely in keeping w a liberty-loving stance; (b) entirely in keeping with defending the lives of the innocent. THE END.

Travis Corcoran and his ilk are all mentally and spiritually ill. God have mercy upon them because the proverbial Satan sure won't. Stop, turn, repent, and atone, Travis Corcoran, before it becomes too late for you in this age.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 – present, website developer and writer. 2015 – present, insurance broker.

    Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration.

    Volunteerism: 2007 – present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.

    This entry was posted in Libertarian Capitalism. Bookmark the permalink.