My Take: False Liberalism: "Power Concedes Nothing Without a Demand," by Chris Hedges

"Let the Christian religion be manipulated by charlatans to demonize Muslims, gays and intellectuals, discredit science and become a source of personal enrichment." — Chris Hedges

via Truthdig - Power Concedes Nothing Without a Demand.

Well, I agree with much of Chris's article. I might say with the vast majority of it. However, he mixes up Christian teaching as one might shake salt and pepper onto food.

"Demonize" is a loaded term here the use of which I would hardly equate with honest and thorough intellectualism especially since Chris has had ample opportunity through the years to elaborate/clarify but hasn't that I've seen anyway. Certainly Islam and Christianity are not able to be reconciled. It is also a basic tenet of Christ that "He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad." (Matthew 12:30 KJV) Chris has read that. He knows what it means. It means that those who are not Christians are anti-Christs. He also knows what that means. When one is being anti-Christ, one is necessarily being demonic, by Christian definition. These things though are inconvenient to Chris's false "liberal" Christianity.

I like much about Chris Hedges, but he is a misleader.

He knows that Paul wrote: "And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet." (Romans 1:27 KJVR) What is meet (proper)? "Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them." (Romans 1:32 KJV)

Now, I'm not what is termed "Pauline," but that isn't to say that I disagree with everything Paul wrote, far from it. I agree with everything he wrote that is consistent with what Jesus did and said. I disagree where he, as apparent to me, diverged. He did not diverge on the issue of sexual behavior that I can see, and I can back up that statement with scripture that isn't taken in some selective context that can be overturned via other scripture from Jesus. More to the point, I don't see anyone being able to refute my position via a full-context reading of Jesus and Paul.

As for discrediting science, Chris knows full well that the feeding of the five thousand runs contrary to current scientific thinking. "And he commanded the multitude to sit down on the grass, and took the five loaves, and the two fishes, and looking up to heaven, he blessed, and brake, and gave the loaves to his disciples, and the disciples to the multitude. And they did all eat, and were filled: and they took up of the fragments that remained twelve baskets full. And they that had eaten were about five thousand men, beside women and children." (Matthew 14:19-21 KJV) It has been disparaged as "magical thinking." Chris echoes himself repeatedly, but I never hear him elaborate on these issues. I see him as standing off from them, as they are, again, inconvenient to his brand of liberalism.

My Take: False Liberalism: "Power Concedes Nothing Without a Demand," by Chris Hedges

Union Protesters/Supporters in the Wisconsin Capitol

I deplore laissez-faire capitalism. To me, it is the heart and soul of evil. It is the heart and soul of selfishness that is the heart and soul of the proverbial Satan. I have offered many stepping stones to get us out from under that scourge. Unfortunately so far, most people choose to stay within their fallen "comfort zone." I deplore militarism. I also deplore sexual behaviors that cause souls to fall, and yes, that includes homosex but also fornication, adultery, pedophilia, bestiality, pornography, multiple sex-partners, and all other sexual errors as wittingly harmful and that can be and should be overcome through faith and by God's grace. Yes, if you find these errors in yourself, you should hate them. It is right to hate them. Chris evidently doesn't believe one should hate the error that is homosexuality or to overcome it.

This does not mean that I hold with coercive secular governments or theocracies whether violent or otherwise. I do hold with the separation of the sheep from the goats however. I simply do not seek the sadistic punishment of any soul. Pain and suffering however are a natural outgrowth of selfish error. I would that every soul come to realize it and to act properly accordingly. I do not take exception to God's ultimate way. I see God as fair and just. I don't see God as the wrath, per se. I see God as the overcoming of wrath and all attendant offense. Jesus never called down the wrath and even counseled against doing so — no matter how tempting. I don't see Jesus as being inconsistent and returning in the wrath against which he preached. That would be Jesus being hypocritical, a thing he despises. Wrath though comes against itself. It is the self-devouring spirit — Satan. It is temptation to fall, to offend God, to even tempt God.

Chris is right that Jesus was and is a radical, but Chris hasn't been nearly radicalized enough. He's been hammering on the same themes now for years, all the while attempting to completely ignore where he's falling short himself. I cannot imagine that he has not been confronted by Paul vis-a-vis homosexuality. What does he have to say for himself on that? Is it too uncomfortable an issue to deal with directly as the main and sole subject matter anywhere? Must it be simply mentioned as "liberal" to appeal to that lost flock for the overarching cause Chris sees as "liberal" Christianity — that watered down Christianity that Christ himself would say must get behind him, "Satan"?

The stepping stones I've suggested/offered do use "the system" from within for a bit. The stones though if followed one after the next lead to the strait gate unto the narrow way. I don't hide that goal at all. I offer reforming the monetary system of the US by nationalizing the Federal Reserve and converting all Fed notes into interest-and-tax-free United States Notes and to use those notes to pay off the National Debt and to pay for all infrastructure and for full meaningful and fruitful employment — not merely capitalist gain. You may read about these things on this site. I go further though via the Christian Commons. That is faith bringing forth works worthy of repentance — bringing the spirit of the real Heaven to Earth just as prayed for in the Lord's Prayer.

Of course, God is power and we certainly don't need to demand that God concede. It is we who need to concede to God.

Peace of the Lord to you, Chris.

  • Subscribe
  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Libertarian Capitalism, United States Notes. Bookmark the permalink.