President Obama's Long Form Birth CertificatePosted byon April 27, 2011 at 08:57 AM EDT
Ed. Note: Read the transcript of the President's remarks following this release or watch the video below:
In 2008, in response to media inquiries, the President’s campaign requested his birth certificate from the state of Hawaii. The state sent the campaign the President’s birth certificate, the same legal documentation provided to all Hawaiians as proof of birth in state, and the campaign immediately posted it on the internet. That birth certificate can be seen here (PDF).
When any citizen born in Hawaii requests their birth certificate, they receive exactly what the President received. In fact, the document posted on the campaign website is what Hawaiians use to get a driver’s license from the state and the document recognized by the Federal Government and the courts for all legal purposes. That’s because it is the birth certificate. This is not and should not be an open question.
The President believed the distraction over his birth certificate wasn’t good for the country. It may have been good politics and good TV, but it was bad for the American people and distracting from the many challenges we face as a country. Therefore, the President directed his counsel to review the legal authority for seeking access to the long form certificate and to request on that basis that the Hawaii State Department of Health make an exception to release a copy of his long form birth certificate. They granted that exception in part because of the tremendous volume of requests they had been getting. President Barack Obama's long form birth certificate can be seen here (PDF):
At a time of great consequence for this country – when we should be debating how we win the future, reduce our deficit, deal with high gas prices, and bring stability to the Middle East, Washington, DC, was once again distracted by a fake issue. The President’s hope is that with this step, we can move on to debating the bigger issues that matter to the American people and the future of the country.Dan Pfeiffer is White House Communications Director
I want to say that Barack Obama has done what I suggested he do (See: "Birther Donald Trump, You're Not Hired! President Barack Obama, You're Still Fired!"). However, had I been advising him or had I written his speech concerning it, I would not have had him stating that he sat back bemused. He should have put this whole thing to rest during the campaign and early on during it — the moment it appeared it was going to turn into a conspiracy theory with legs, as it did.
Anyway, this will cause this thing to die down. Donald Trump will have zero option but to admit that Barack Obama has supplied exactly what Trump had been calling for. There will be naysayers, but they are truly fringe not to be taken seriously on this issue.
Now, if we are going to criticize Barack Obama, let's do it on the "real" issues, as he's rightly called them.
- He was not born outside the US.
- He is not a socialist, although being a non-coercive socialist is far better than being a capitalist.
- He is not a Muslim. He's not a Christian either except for paying lip-service, but that's another issue — somewhat.
Anyway, even though I disagree with him hugely, may God bless the President of the United States. I want that blessing to be with the truth. I want him to be blessed with the truth. Among others, his statement concerning the Pentagon versus the Sermon on the Mount indicates that he doesn't currently have it. That's the blessing I want for everyone in existence: The truth.
Barack Obama is not my choice for leader. However, Barack Obama is my brother. He is a fellow Homo sapien. I hope he is of the fold but only lost and will be found. That's how I'd like it to be concerning everyone in existence.
I have been informed though that there is something called radical evil that some souls will refuse to overcome even when the option is there for the taking. Concerning them, the issue is among God and the devil and those souls. I won't vouch for those who reject Jesus. I never would have even before I understood what Jesus was saying. I always knew he at least was right about most everything. It was my shortcoming that I hadn't dug deeper sooner to find out what he really meant when he utter the words from the cross: "Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani?"
Also, contrary to what Barack Obama said in his speech, there is a place for vilification of a sort. There are villains, and they do need to be called out and exposed if they will not listen to reason. Qaddaffi is such a one. Assad is such a one. There are also people in "high" places in the US government and state and local governments and corporations who are villainous at the very least. Monsanto Corporation is a prime example. The Koch brothers are another.
Barack Obama, himself, has his villainous aspects that he truly needs to shed. I would like to see him do it. I truly would. I hope he truly wants the best for me also.
I seek that perfection that is God. God's name, among many, is perfection. There's nothing wrong with that, by definition. Seek God also. Peace.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)