Debunking the Big Lie Right-Wingers Use to Justify Black Poverty and Unemployment

...what Kern and other adherents of the "culture of poverty" thesis can't explain is why blacks' economic fortunes advanced so dramatically during the 1990s, retreated again during the Bush years and then were completely devastated in the financial crash of 2008.

In order to buy the cultural story, one would have to believe that African Americans adopted a "culture of success" during the Clinton years, mysteriously abandoned it for a "culture of failure" under Bush and finally settled on a "culture of poverty" shortly after Lehman Brothers crashed.

Debunking the Big Lie Right-Wingers Use to Justify Black Poverty and Unemployment | | AlterNet.

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
    • I've installed DISQUS's WordPress plugin. I had tried it once before years ago.

      Back then, I had export/import comment issues and ended up with duplicate comments in my WordPress database that I cleaned out myself.

      Apparently though, another table in the database was still holding duplicate info from DISQUS even up to yesterday.

      I followed the instructions over at DISQUS, and fortunately, when I synced the commenting systems here and there, all the DISQUS duplicates disappeared here but not over on DISQUS. DISQUS had imported the duplicates. It was a vicious circle (sort of).

      I considered killing the blog and database table at DISQUS but opted rather to semi-manually delete only all the comments. I uninstalled everything about DISQUS here on the blog right down to cleaning the Options table, which DISQUS didn't do when I ran its uninstaller.

      Early this morning (very early), I reinstalled and then did the export of all the comments here back to DISQUS. Currently, all of those comments are sitting somewhere in DISQUS's database under the status "Queued for import." Yesterday, they imported nearly instantly. Today, it's been many hours. DISQUS is indicating that 0% have been sucked in yet.

      I'm hesitant to do anything because I don't want to trigger the duplicates issue if what I've done so far will have cleaned it up.

      Anyway, this comment will at least test the system a bit in the interim and also serve to let those who look know that I haven't deleted every comment on this blog. They're all still there in the WordPress database. I can see them all via the admin dashboard.

      • Everything is working so far.

        I think I like this system enough that even if there are duplicates, I'll get DISQUS's support involved to get to the bottom of it.

        I did notice that the time-stamp on the duplicates and the text formatting was different. The time-stamp was 14 hours earlier than this blogs time. All the paragraphs were there but without any line spaces between them on a number of the dups.

        I'm already missing the HTML-coding info of the old commenting system though.

        • Okay, DISQUS just finished importing 100%. It synced back to the blog, so the two comments above actually are in the WordPress database too. However, because all of the imported comments are still sitting in DISQUS's database as "deleted" (but can still be called back up), I believe it is clear that I must delete the blog and all comments over on DISQUS.

          Theres a one-button solution for that over there.

          Then, I'll "uninstall" over here again and try to export from here and import over there. If all of this doesn't work, I'll get the support team involved.

        • DISQUS asked me why I'm deleting the blog and all comments from DISQUS. My answer:

          I've had the duplicate-comment problem. I believe deleting and then recreating may help. Syncing got rid of all the duplicates in the WordPress database (it's a long story) but not on DISQUS. I manually deleted all the comments on DISQUS, but exporting from WordPress didn't overwrite those with approved comments.

          I'm trying to fix this myself before bothering you all for help, which I will if this doesn't work.

          After clicking delete, DISQUS said, "Please allow up to 48 hours for this website to be completely removed." Ugh.