Partial Truth, Partial Hogwash: IRON MOUNTAIN REPORT: The United Nations/UFO Deception *Full Documentary* - YouTube

Look, this video is done by Christian gun-nuts, which actually don't exist. What I mean by that is that no Christian has a gun for "self-defense" or to ward off a militant dictatorship. Christians don't fight. They don't fight back. Christians are non-violent, period!

Let me point out a few other things. Christians don't buy anonymous statements or documents. You don't attach your real name, you're not a credible source for Christians. You're a coward who won't put his or her body on the line for the sake of real convictions.

In addition, Albert Pike did not write the supposed letter about three world wars. It was a hoax by Leo Taxil, one of several aspects of his huge hoaxing.

Also, military Keynesianism is a net loss. The military makes some people money, but it drains the world more than it ever adds. It is not productive. Ammunition spends without creating. War is a waste and nothing but.

Let me also add that polluting the environment is a huge error. The Industrial Revolution coupled with greed has caused gigantic problems. Someone with a vested interest in a polluting industry or industries is behind the sentiments expressed in this video.

I'm not saying that the author(s) of the video knows in a highly conscious manner. They/he may. We'd have to dig to find out. Some people are just plain unknowing dupes of the likes of the Koch Brothers and their predecessors.

This is not to say that the greediest of the greedy are not out to dominate the world and humanity. That's always been the case. What's missing from this video is the fact that environmental polluters behind one of the biggest industries in the world right now, if not the biggest, (oil) have trillions of dollars on the line and want to continue dominating. Therefore, they pooh-pooh oil, gas, and coal pollution.

Here's another point, this video selectively quotes the Bible out of its full context. Many of the statements about the anti-Christ and all the antichrists apply just as easily to the oil industry executives for example. They are just as full of lust as are the banksters. They fuel the war machines that the banksters fund often from recycled oil money. Its a cozy relationship on some levels.

You need to understand that Creation Care is not an antichrist endeavor but the exact opposite. It is completely in sync with Jesus's message to do unto others as you would have them do unto you. It is the Golden Rule. Polluting your neighbors' planet/home is not the Golden Rule. It is against Jesus's teachings and doings. Consider it well before you glom onto this so-called Iron Mountain Report video.

I'm not saying I disagree with everything in this video. Of course the UN is antichrist. It is not Christian. Everyone knows that. However, just because that is true does not mean that Christians are supposed to have a negative knee-jerk reaction to everything that comes out of the UN. There are UN statements and actions that do not, I repeat, do not, contradict Christian tenets. Christians are to discern. Christians are to distance themselves only from anti-Christian statements and deeds.

The UN system being put forth in this video will fail; however, that does not mean that a one-world government is inherently evil. Jesus heads a one-world government. Heaven itself is a one-world, one-universe government under God the father of Jesus who is one with Jesus and the Holy Spirit in spirit. Wrap your mind and soul and heart around that.

Also, this video is anti-Freemasonry, but the US was founded mostly by Freemasons. Nearly all of the leading "Founding Fathers" were Freemasons. So, why would a Christian or Christians be so alarmed at the extension of the same Masonic principles to the whole world? I don't like it, but my point is still valid.

Something that's important to understand about these types of videos (conspiracy theory) is that just because someone is able to write something explaining to a degree what is actually happening does not mean that those who are making things happen are following that writing. A hoax can definitely follow or parallel what is actually happening while couching it all in terms that actually distort what is actually happening.

Here are the last 6 mins of the video:


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.