I saw a headline on Yahoo!: "Video shows bully attacking 15-year-old gay student." I thought, well, I wonder. I wonder because the initial story is often insufficient, so I wasn't ready to jump on the bandwagon but just clicked to read it. There was a video. It was embedded from YouTube, so I clicked over to watch it there. It's fuzzy and is as much voice over and shots of the complaining mother as it is of what actually happened. The story or text on Yahoo! News was scant, so I was certainly not ready to make up my mind as to what precipitated the beating. I will say that I thought the whole time how the boy shouldn't be reacting this way -- beating the other. However, I remember the rough and tumble days of teenage boyism and prayed the boy will mature out of it and soon. It happens.
Well, there were a couple of comments right under the video. The ones that get the most "likes" are there. The second one just made me sicker than the video. Here it is:
I'm sorry, but if you attack a "gay person" I firmly believe that you are acting out of hatred for the feelings that you yourself are experiencing. As for the teen that inacted this assault, he should be put to the chair. As well as any teen that carries a weapon to school (I.E. Jonesboro, AR) Because we have become so soft on our children (Spanking is abuse) they are becoming increasingly violent. Little Rock, AR, a 3 (That's right. THREE!) yr old put another in ICU over a TOY! MAKE AN EXAMPLE!
Here's my reply:
@FallenAngelBKR251 "he should be put to the chair"? You are a complete idiot! You haven't a clue about what went on before this happened, but you're ready to execute a boy for beating up another kid. God damned homosexual fascism is coming out. Your handle "Fallen" suits you. No one should beat anyone, and no one should execute anyone else either, especially just a boy and especially when you don't have the full story on both sides. Your barbaric mentality is a huge part of the problem!
You can find the comments here: YouTube - Broadcast Yourself..
I debated whether to embed the video here because I'm offended by the extremely poor reporting and the obvious editing for effect, as if a beating doesn't speak for itself. Frankly, if you were to have shown the video without the mother talking while it's running and without cutting back and forth to her, I would have found that to be less manipulative reporting, especially since the reporter/editor did not know the circumstances leading up to the beating.
It may come out that the beaten boy truly had not done or said anything and that the other boy was simply beating him up for being a homosexual. However, you can't just assume that from the video and the bit that was told by the mother. You have to reserve judgment until you get the whole story else you become a fascistic society.
Let's not forget that the Nazis SA Brown Shirts under Ernst Rohm were notorious homosexuals and bullies. The degree to which Rohm's homosexuality played in his fascism is nearly covered up today by pro-homosexual forces. His homosexuality figured very prominently. He considered it a strength for power.
I see many of the same tendencies at work right now in the homosexual movement in the US. One need look no further than the Pentagon with all of the militant homosexuals flooding in and taking over.
As you can see, they're already calling for anyone who "bullies" a homosexual to be executed, even potentially abused boys. That's right. No one knows what's gone on yet. The boy dishing it out could have been on the receiving end of worse and from a homosexual. We don't know just from a fuzzy video and a mother talking knee-jerk.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)