Treason From Within: The Road towards a Police State in America
Defense Authorization bill allows for military detentions of American citizens in the US.
by Dr. Andrew Bosworth
Global Research, November 28, 2011
Preparing for the Final Takedown?
There is a shocking piece of legislation working its way through Congress. A Defense Authorization bill for 2012 allows for military detentions of American citizens on American soil. These can be indefinite detentions, with no trial.
The American Civil Liberties Union statement (more of an alert) on November 23, 2011 deserves special attention:
"The U.S. Senate is considering the unthinkable: changing detention laws to imprison people — including Americans living in the United States itself — indefinitely and without charge."
"The Defense Authorization bill — a "must-pass" piece of legislation — is headed to the Senate floor with troubling provisions that would give the President — and all future presidents — the authority to indefinitely imprison people, without charge or trial, both abroad and inside the United States."
"If enacted, sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA would:
1) Explicitly authorize the federal government to indefinitely imprison without charge or trial American citizens and others picked up inside and outside the United States;
(2) Mandate military detention of some civilians who would otherwise be outside of military control, including civilians picked up within the United States itself; and
(3) Transfer to the Department of Defense core prosecutorial, investigative, law enforcement, penal, and custodial authority and responsibility now held by the Department of Justice."
"The bill was drafted in secret by Sens. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) and passed in a closed-door committee meeting, without even a single hearing."
I have to tell you that what Levin and McCain have done is nothing short of complete insanity.
I have never been more offended for the Bill of Rights in my life.
This is worse, WORSE!, than George W. Bush and his trampling all over US citizens rights. This is turning the US into El Salvador during the worst of the worst in Central America under the dictatorships there. There is nothing separating the US government from labeling anybody a terrorist and disappearing that person in this bill. They don't have to hold even a military trial, which would still be wrong but something where a military would stand up for the accused. That would not make this bill acceptable though.
This legislation is an outrage. I can't condemn it enough. It makes me sick.
Everything the Bill of Rights is about is exactly to protect US citizens from this legislation. It's the worst piece of legislation I have ever heard of getting anywhere near as much support in the US Senate that this monstrosity has received.
This legislation is so bad that it really does threaten to bring the left and Libertarians together against the neocons and Zionists -- and that's who's behind this piece of crap legislation -- Zionists, the same people who steal land in Palestine, the same people who are led by that pathological Likudnik liar, Netanyahu, who is trying to get the US to make war on Iran based upon a gigantic pack of lies and for Israeli ambitions for empire in the Middle East. Don't kid yourself.
The Patriot Act was an abomination, but this thing makes that look citizen friendly.
Look, this is the stuff of why the Arab Spring has happened. Levin and McCain, et al., think they're going to shove Americans into a box that the Arabs are breaking out of. They're insane. They're more than risking civil war in the US. There are people who will take up arms to fight to the death rather than be dragged off just because someone tips the military that someone else is or maybe a terrorist (but who really is nothing of the kind but rather just protesting and physically defending his constitutional right to do so).
The gun dealers and ammo dealers are going to have a field day. The black market in weapons will go crazy. Organized crime will make a mint. People will steal just to afford an arsenal. And don't think it won't include hi-tech weapons. There are advanced scientist in and out of this country who will join a rebellion against tyranny that this sort of legislation pretty much guarantees.
Where were Levin and McCain born, under rocks? Don't they remember the Senate hearings about governmental abuse and overreach and all the problems it caused and how close to revolution it took the country? Wake the Hell up!
I have been saying for years now that this direction is playing with fire.
So far, Occupy has been non-violent. There have been a few property damagers, but who knows whether those were government agents. However, if you push a peaceful people far enough, long enough, the vast majority will turn to violence to protect themselves and their family members.
If you think you've already numbed them to the point where they will remain passive, just look at the Arab Spring. It can happen here and will if you idiots don't back off.
I am not calling for the violent overthrow of this unlawful regime called the United States of America. I am warning that others will do it. They will be every bit as clever as the US intelligence and military because they won't have any choice. They will have been driven to it by stupid Senators and Congressmen who will lose their heads quickly if they're lucky.
God, what the Hell is happening? Who put the most insane inmates in charge?
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)