The "liberals" are getting ready to be duped again: "Obama's Historic Speech: Another Politician Pushed Into Populism by the OWS Climate?."
Here's my take:
This guy, Barack Obama, knew all of this in 2008, but what did he do?
He spoke like this before he got rolling in the primaries. Then he backed off and screwed up everything by doing nearly nothing he's giving speeches about now.
Okay, so could he grow in office? Could he be forced to be a new FDR?
Here's the deal. Let's see his New New Deal now! Let's see the plan he says he'll force through ASAP if the people give him the Senate and House he'll need to do it.
Here's another thing. To Hell with saying "the middle class" over and over and over. Where is he talking about the poor. There are people who won't ever become middle class in Obama's world no matter how hard they work. Everyone isn't equal, but why should those who have gifts not turn around to lift everyone else?
This speech was not Populist! It was a mixed and ambiguous speech.
Not only that but he'll go give another speech that will sound anti-populist (and I mean the Populist Movement Populists).
He's already dead wrong that we need budget cuts. He knows that there are people out here teaching others that we could use United States Notes to pay off the National Debt now! We could have zero taxes. All we need to do is put into circulation the supply of money that matches the real productivity rate -- no finance capitalism!
You'll notice that Barack Obama lauded Teddy Roosevelt because TR was a Progressive, but when he mentioned Franklin Roosevelt, he didn't mention public employment; and we need public employment now. We need over 20 million jobs now and on the public payroll all paid for via United States Notes. We need the CCC and WPA on steroids. We need to build a clean, sustainable energy system. Those are jobs just waiting for a real leader, not a bankster shill!
We need publicly funded high-skills training.
We need trade standards that demand higher environmental and labor and safety standards all across the globe.
Now, if you people are dumb enough not to demand that Barack Obama lay out in writing the exact legislation, a la, FDR only ten times stronger, before you even consider voting for him, you'll get exactly what you deserve, which will be Barack Obama getting into office for a second term and then compromising all over again rather than standing up as a strong leader who can call the people to action to phone and write and email their representatives to do what is necessary to end this depression (yes, depression) now.
He's playing it safe by summoning up the ghost of TR. We don't need a TR right now. We need someone who will drive in the same direction FDR drove only much harder and further.
There is zero reason why there should be one person anywhere in the US living in poverty. That's a fact.
Now, to be completely open here, I don't have any faith in the secular government known as the United States of America. What I do have though is the certain knowledge that there is such a thing as the lesser of evils. I don't call upon people to support the US government, ever. I don't call upon them to violently overthrow it either or to subvert it via tricks and lies and the like. Only the absolute truth should be used to improve the governing of humanity. That's my position.
Look, FDR was no saint. I'm not asking Barack Obama to channel him. FDR walked the talk though even though he did it from a wheelchair. Frankly, warts and all, Franklin D. Roosevelt was the best President this country ever had; and if he hadn't died in office but lived on decades after his fourth term, there's a high likelihood that the National Security State would never have become the monster that it is. Certainly, the current Republican favorite, Ronald Reagan, can't even begin to hold a candle to FDR. Yet, we must do better, much, much better.
I actually call upon people to join the Christian Commons. That's the right political economy for Heaven and Earth. Well, I do believe in God and know that God can provide without a human lifting a finger; but the Commons is in line with getting hearts and mind straight for those better and best times ahead for those who accept, love, and do. Bring forth?
Thank you, and may God bless the universe.
Here's Barack Obama's speech given on December 6, 2011. Read it with the things I've said in mind: Remarks by the President on the Economy in Osawatomie, Kansas | The White House.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze of discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)