Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
Palais des Nations
December 6, 2011
...there is still, as you all know, much more to be done to secure that commitment, that reality, and progress for all people. Today, I want to talk about the work we have left to do to protect one group of people whose human rights are still denied in too many parts of the world today. In many ways, they are an invisible minority. They are arrested, beaten, terrorized, even executed. Many are treated with contempt and violence by their fellow citizens while authorities empowered to protect them look the other way or, too often, even join in the abuse. They are denied opportunities to work and learn, driven from their homes and countries, and forced to suppress or deny who they are to protect themselves from harm. I am talking about....
...whom and what?
Hillary Clinton says, "It is a violation of human rights when governments declare it illegal to be gay...." Is it?
Hillary Clinton didn't bother to define the term "gay." She didn't say it is homosex. She didn't say what homosex is; what it includes; what it's main attraction is; and who is behind promoting it, pushing for it, proselytizing for it, indoctrinating others into total glorification of it, etc.
What is gay? Gay is a euphemism. Rather than calling homosexuality homosexuality, homosexuals decided to use another term that never meant homosexual but "gay":
1. Showing or characterized by cheerfulness and lighthearted excitement; merry. 2. Bright or lively, especially in color: a gay, sunny room.
What they did was substitute a wonderful term (eliciting all those good feelings) for one that had been generally associated with what is highly offensive behavior but which Hillary Clinton, quite obviously, wants the whole world to come to consider completely correct.
What has always been the main attraction in homosexuality? Anal sex between males is the answer. Yes, there are lesbians; but males have always been rightly accounted the ones with the hyper-libidos. Generally, women have always been better able to control their sexual urges.
So, it is the act of males buggering each other that Hillary Clinton is primarily defending. In her speech, she beat all around the bush on it.
I have put it to her before, and there is no doubt whatsoever that the powers that be have seen that I have done it: Do penises belong in anuses? No governmental official, whether acting in an official capacity or not, has answered the question.
What is the answer? The answer is that they do not belong there. Nothing good ever comes from anal sex, homosexual or heterosexual. Sodomy is an error with nothing but negative results. It is not harmless, ever! It is no more harmless than the first drag and inhalation of nicotine-ladened tobacco. Definite negatives are experienced by the body and mind (and spirit/soul) from the very instant in which anal sex is performed. It is something that should never be done, never be promoted, never be authorized, never be tolerated, never be condoned, never be celebrated but rather all of the opposites of those things. The children should not be taught that homosex is okay or good but rather they should be warned away from homosexual behavior and at age-appropriate times, if homosexuals are still on the prowl (and they do prey), then those children should be taught the exact physiological, anatomical, and pathological reasons why anal sex is wrong and why and how the notion of homosexual "rights" is an error in judgment -- how it is most definitely a slippery slope to other ever-increasing temptations to harmful feelings, thoughts, words, and behaviors entering in to do the following to the person:
break down, brutalize, canker, contaminate, debase, debauch, decay, decompose, defile, degrade, demoralize, deprave, dishonor, go bad, infect, muddy, pervert, poison, pollute, putrefy, rot, soil, stain, taint, turn, vitiate, and warp
What Hillary Clinton is doing is the following:
base, conscienceless, corrupted, crooked, depraved, deviant, dishonest, dishonorable, disreputable, double-dealing, immoral, indecent, knavish, larcenous, perverse, perverted, roguish, slippery, twisted, unconscionable, unethical, unnatural, unprincipled, unscrupulous, unwholesome, and warped
What we don't need are global leaders and others promoting what causes people to become rotten, what ruins their characters and makes them morally impure -- lacking in complete ethics and scruples.
Hillary Clinton's speech is shameless. It is a call to unwholesomeness. She should not be the Secretary of State of the United States of America.
Homosexuality is a choice. There is not one person who engages in homosexuality who cannot stop, who cannot change his or her mind (the very matter of their brains). They are what they do. If they stop, they will change from being that. The brain is plastic/flexible. It is not immutable! She is wrong!
American society in general has been highly sexualized via marketing, advertising, selling of all types all of which has come out from the dark side. The sooner humanity does away with that, the better.
Is it "a violation of human rights when governments declare it illegal to" smoke tobacco? Exactly where is the line properly drawn concerning this concept of human rights? Right now, smoking is illegal in many places and for the young. The smoker wants to assert his or her "right" over the "right" of others not to be subjected to the smoke. What is Hillary Clinton doing but reversing that concerning homosexuality?
I don't watch TV or go to movies, etc., but I do read. What I've read is that homosexuality is flooding in everywhere. This is not a good thing! It is a mistake.
Hillary Clinton though frames the issue only in terms of mean-spiritedness on the part of anti-homosexuality. She does not refine the argument down to the point where one is anti-homosexuality but not so from any mean-spiritedness but rather the exact opposite that is really loving souls enough that, that one warns others against sodomy!
Jesus told everyone via the scriptures to go and sin no more. He said it while refuting those with sin who wanted to punish an adulteress to death. He did not say go and continue being an adulteress. Also, if adultery was sin then, it is now; and in what way is adultery a lesser sin than sodomy?
The earliest Church council was over an issue of Mosaic Law that was circumcision. The Church struggled with the issue until it was concluded that the letter of the law on circumcision was not to trump the spirit of law allowing Gentiles not to undergo circumcision to join the Church. The decision was the correct one.
No where do you find any Church councils where the Mosaic Law proscribing homosex to be overturned by the spirit of Christ until very recently by apostates who deliberately avoid all of the words and deeds of Jesus that clearly show that he did not condone homosex in any way, shape, or form. All arguments to the contrary are specious and refutable from the Gospel record.
In addition, as I pointed out above but without saying so verbatim, even without the Gospels, it would remain obvious that sodomy is an error.
Hillary said that "the ability of religious minorities to practice their faith freely has been secured." It is being made insecure by Hillary Clinton.
Hillary said, "...the governments that drafted and passed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights were not thinking about how it applied to ... indigenous people or children or people with disabilities or other marginalized groups." That is patently untrue! The rights of all of those people was understood and implied.
She further said, "LGBT does not make you less human. And that is why gay rights are human rights, and human rights are gay rights." Murdering people in that sense then does not make one less human, and in that case, the right to murder is a human right, which of course, is ridiculous/illogical on Hillary's part and the part of her speech writers and those who agree with her on it and support her and applaud her speech. One may substitute in any behavior one wants in Hillary's conveniently selective world.
Is her premise correct that Â LGBT does not make one less human? Define "human." Define "dehumanizing behavior." Define "inhuman behavior." Sodomy is definitely a lessening.
Sodomy, per se, is a disease. Being a woman, per se, is not. Being a Black person, per se, is not. Society fights disease. Often though, diseases go unidentified, or as in the case of sodomy and homosex, society can lose its way, as is the case with all the societies that are falsely claiming that homosex is fine.
Here is what Jesus did. Jesus preached and let his true words do their work. Those who heeded were of his Church. The only coercive act concerning human beings recorded on the part of Jesus was when he cleaned the temple. The temple though was a voluntary place to be. In fact, it is my understanding the ceremonially unclean were not allowed in. Well, Jesus cleaned out the Hillary types.
Hillary Clinton said, "gay people are born into...the world." She has zero proof that anyone is born homosexual. Genetics can predispose a person to being overcome by some things more than others and in different ways than other people. What there is no proof for though is a homosexual gene or even complex of genes such that the person is choiceless. She does not know the science of it. She's spewing gross misinformation/false-propaganda and doing so at the highest levels. It's very, very wicked.
The third, and perhaps most challenging, issue arises when people cite religious or cultural values as a reason to violate or not to protect the human rights of LGBT citizens. This is not unlike the justification offered for violent practices towards women like honor killings, widow burning, or female genital mutilation. Some people still defend those practices as part of a cultural tradition. But violence toward women isn't cultural; it's criminal. Likewise with slavery, what was once justified as sanctioned by God is now properly reviled as an unconscionable violation of human rights.
That though has already been refuted just above it. The idea that sodomites are on a par with the naturally choiceless (being born that way) aspects of femaleness and race and ethnicity is such bad reasoning that it should never have been allowed. No one thinks herself into having a penis. No black person wills himself white. I don't say that such transformations are beyond the ability of the Holy Spirit, but people do think themselves from heterosexual to homosexual. There's a huge difference considering the negative/disease aspects of homosexuality.
White Racists said Blacks are inherently inferior and deserving of slavery. Blacks as individuals though have clearly shown that they are as capable in all walks of life as Whites. Once on that level, they do not necessarily inject into White society any disease states. The racists were wrong. The same cannot be said of sodomy.
Hillary further said:
...no practice or tradition [religion] trumps the human rights that belong to...LGBT people, criminalizing their status or behavior, expelling them from their families and communities....
You see there that Hillary Clinton is saying that it is international law that a Christian father cannot tell his anal-sex engaging son (homosexually or not) that if the son doesn't stop, the father will not allow the son to remain under his roof. She is saying that the father's knowledge that sodomy is anti-Christ, anti-wholesomeness, corrupting, contagious, etc., is of no effect. Hillary is telling the world that governments have the responsibility to prevent that father from seeking to correct his son's harmful behavior, which behavior can (and homosexual behavior does) pervert the family, tribe, and nation, etc.
Progress starts with honest discussion. Now, there are some who say and believe that...homosexuality is a disease that can be caught or cured, or that gays recruit others to become gay. Well, these notions are simply not true.
An honest discussion is exactly what is needed, but Hillary Clinton did not discuss these matters directly with those who disagree and have the hard evidence to show that they are correct.
Hillary is either woefully ignorant, has lived a completely sheltered life, or is disingenuous about this.
I cannot count the number of times others have attempted to recruit me to become homosexual. It's just a plain fact that she, I believe, is flat out lying about or is suffering from an extreme case of cognitive dissonance.
Homosexuals and bisexuals are on the make just as much as heterosexuals. In fact, in my experience, I have found homosexuals to be much more predatory. Of course, I'm not an attractive woman who has to fend off heterosexual wolves, so....
From here down in this post, I will simply quote Hillary Clinton without prefacing.
But progress comes from changes in laws. In many places, including my own country, legal protections have preceded, not followed, broader recognition of rights. Laws have a teaching effect. Laws that discriminate validate other kinds of discrimination. Laws that require equal protections reinforce the moral imperative of equality. And practically speaking, it is often the case that laws must change before fears about change dissipate.
There you have Hillary the dictator/fascist. She is clearly advocating that representative democracy be run by those who say one thing to become elected and then do otherwise once in office.
She is absolutely undemocratic to be preaching that law should be changed before the full discussion is had. Her position is fascistic/disgusting.
She goes on to use the Pentagon as proof she's right. Well, let me tell you something, Hillary, the Pentagon is anti Human Rights!
God Almighty, when will you show these ignorant people that greed, violence, and sexual depravity are all cut from the same evil cloth!
Not only was "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" wrong, the Pentagon is wrong, period. The repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" is doing no one a favor!
In fact, the move is designed to militarize the pro-homosexual agenda to take over the world right along with the rabid capitalists. The Pentagon has been to force open capitalist markets, and everyone who knows anything of real substance about the Pentagon knows it. Have you never bothered to read Smedley Butler's "War Is a Racket"?
How would it feel to be discriminated against for something about myself that I cannot change?
You see there that she's echoing the lie to the whole world. People do change. I've seen it firsthand. I know people who have done it. She's full of confusion and spreading it just like the disease that it is.
I actually wonder how much of this is Hillary excusing her own sexual behavior -- and way of masking over her own guilt.
Let me make this perfectly clear to Hillary Clinton. I will not agree ever that homosex is okay. I don't care who you think you are or what you think will be okay for your homosexual-fascist governments to do to me to attempt to punish me into adopting your lie, but it isn't going to happen!
You can nail me to the cross to die the exact same torturous death that your kind put on Jesus, I will not say that homosex is okay. It is not okay, it never was okay, and it never will be. I'm done with your lies!
You are a liar and false teacher, a bad shepherd, and if you don't repent, you will suffer the consequences whether you like it or not.
Frankly, this speech by Hillary Clinton marks her as the most dangerous person on the planet right now where sexual libertinism and hedonism are concerned.
Her megaphone must be taken away from her. She is steering humanity in the wrong direction. Hillary Clinton is speaking out from the dark side. She is doing it on the taxpayers' dime and doing it globally, ignoring the facts about the fraudulent Alfred Kinsey Reports, etc.
it should never be a crime to be gay.
It isn't a crime to be gay, but it is a crime to engage in or to promote homosex. It is a crime against God. It is a crime against humanity. It is anti-love. It is harmful only and always.
The evidence proving that I'm right will come forth in no uncertain terms. The proof is already there, but it will become more and more visible. The contrast will be made starker than stark for all to see and to choose whether they go with Satan or Jesus.
Hillary is not with Jesus! That's a fact.
Hillary Clinton does not speak for me. I am an American, and I wholeheartedly disagree with her. I know that continuing down her path leads to sickness -- huge sickness.
The government I want to see is against greed, selfishness, violence, coercion, and sexual harm. Hillary doesn't know what I'm talking about. It's Heaven, Hillary.
There is little doubt in my mind that support for LGBT human rights will continue to climb. Because for many young people, this is simple: All people deserve to be treated with dignity and have their human rights respected, no matter who they are or whom they love.
This is why Hillary and her kind seek to censor and ignore the basic fundamental that a penis does not belong in an anus, period!
When the young people openly, honestly, and directly face the facts, they will see through the false-propaganda of the pro-homosexuality movement and turn and repent. Praise God from whom all blessings flow.
Ask everyone whether or not penises belong in anuses. Make them stop suffering from cognitive dissonance. Make them snap out of the trance people such as Hillary Clinton and her homosexual speech writers/professional propagandists/twisters put the weak-minded in. Don't be so weak-minded as to fall for the obvious lie that a penis in an anus is proper.
Once you face up to it, then you will know that the children in all of the public schools are being led by Pied Pipers off the cliff of homosexuality that does not stop there but opens the door to the host of Hell.
Truth wins. Hillary is on the side of falsehood. She is a loser. Her side loses!
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)