Bachmann's Latest: Kinsey Report is "A Myth," and she's right!

AlterNet is soooo confused about sex. An article over there raves about Alfred Kinsey. What shoddy work! How misleading!

My comment on AlterNet trying to clue them in there on Alfred Kinsey:

Many people are completely unaware of what the "Report" actually says about homosexuality.

After his "research," Kinsey maintained that homosexual attraction was not fixed but changed. Deal with it if you love his report so much.

He said that children as young as 2 and 3 were having orgasms when they cried and screamed and hit the pedophile anal-rapists he trained. Did you know that? Try reading it. They raped some of the little children until they passed out.

The man was completely insane. He preformed his own circumcision without any pain killer. He also tied a rope to a pipe in the basement of the office, stood on a chair, tied the other end around his testicles, and then jumped off the chair to inflict pain and injury upon himself.

It's all documented. People who supported him and even continue to support him have written and spoken about these things. The conversations are readily available on the Internet if you'd care to become educated about the man who is most responsible for the sexual mess that is getting worse and worse.

Kinsey's friends and associates included many open supporters and members of NAMBLA. Some of them favor bestiality.

It won't turn around until people bother to find out the truth rather than simply reading drivel such as this article.

Fake liberals are dupes! Get real.

Google "Kinsey's Pedophiles," and watch the whole thing. It's only the tip of the iceberg too. I could go on and on about this guy for hours.

You need to understand that we live in the Internet Age. He was busy at a time when the average person didn't have access to Kinsey or didn't bother to read his books.

His life and work have been sanitized by the mass, mainstream, corporate media for the masses so you all won't find out what's really going on to corrupt your souls, to enslave you, to make you buy the iniquitous products of rabid, criminal, depraved capitalists getting richer off your addictions to porn and other selfish lusts. Get a clue.

Bachmann's Latest: Kinsey Report is "A Myth" | AlterNet.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.