The following is from a very pro-Nazi site. The thing is that Zionist and Neocon propaganda has been so effective that any equally extreme or even less extreme propaganda on the other side is considered much more extreme while that Zionist propaganda is taken as mainstream.
Problems arise when one wants to sort the truth from the fiction on both or all sides. Just considering indisputable facts if they come from Nazis is considered too dangerous, even if it is completely intellectually and morally justifiable, even necessary.
Anyway, read the following and let me know what you think. Don't throw garbage at me in the form of commentary. If it's not thoughtful and transparently honest, if it's foul or trolling, it won't see the light of day on this site. I've have it with trolls -- no more! You can disagree, but do it intelligently. Present a thoughtful argument.
The ridiculous fairy tale that exactly 6,000,000 Jews were killed in gas chambers and by other means by Hitler and his forces is already dead, even as far as the official story is concerned. Raul Hilberg, a Jewish supremacist who was considered to be the leading "expert" on the so-called Holocaustâ„¢ and preeminent author of exterminationist literature like "The Destruction of the European Jews," admitted under oath in the kangaroo court of the first ZÃ¼ndel trial in 1985 that there is no scientific proof that Jews had been gassed and that there is not a single Nazi document to be found actually setting forth an order nor allocating a monetary budget for the extermination of Jewry (he actually had to revise an earlier edition of his book where he falsely claimed that there was a Hitler order). On the contrary, all the documents dealing with the Nazis' solution of the Jewish question refer to emigration.
In 1990, the Auschwitz State Museum All of those things existed in the Auschwitz concentration camp complex., a reduction of 3,000,000. For forty-five years following WWII, governments, historians, journalists, professors, etc, were — like parrots — repeating the fraudulent four million figure as fact, yet now they confess it was a giant lie! Would you really expect to find a swimming pool (fitted with a diving board), a soccer field, a cinema, a theater, a brothel, hospitals, a post-office, religious facilities, a sauna, an artist's studio, kitchens, dental facilities, etc, in a perilous "death factory"?
Many more "official" reductions of the death figures at several of the major Nazi concentration camps have been made. For example, the lying Jews initially claimed that "2,000,000 people, mostly Jews" were "exterminated" in Mauthausen, a camp in Austria, but now claim only 14,000 Jews died there. It was originally claimed that 1,500,000 Jews were done to death in Majdanek, a camp in Poland. This figure was officially revised down to 79,000.
Included in Alex's absurd 20,000,000 death figure most likely is the alleged "5,000,000 non-Jews" that the hoaxers claim also died at the hands of the Nazis. To debunk this assertion I will simply quote from one of the most prominent Holocaustâ„¢ hucksters out there — the ultra-Zionist Jewess Deborah Lipstadt:
"Why is Segev so forgiving of Simon Wiesenthal's many lapses? Perhaps we can arrive at an answer by considering Wiesenthal's most egregious distortion of the historical record and Segev's response to it. In the 1970s, Wiesenthal began to refer to "eleven million victims" of the Holocaust, six million Jews and five million non-Jews, but the latter number had no basis in historical reality.
… Wiesenthal's contrived death toll, with its neat almost-symmetry, has become a widely accepted "fact." Jimmy Carter's Executive Order, which was the basis for the establishment of the US Holocaust Museum, referred to the "eleven million victims of the Holocaust." I have been to many Yom Hashoah observances-including those sponsored by synagogues and Jewish communities-where eleven candles were lit. When I tell the organizers that they are engaged in historical revisionism, their reactions range from skepticism to outrage. Strangers have taken me to task in angry letters for focusing "only" on Jewish deaths and ignoring the five million others. When I explain that this number is simply inaccurate, in fact made up, they become even more convinced of my ethnocentrism and inability to feel the pain of anyone but my own people.
When Israeli historians Yehuda Bauer and Yisrael Gutman challenged Wiesenthal on this point, he admitted that he had invented the figure of eleven million victims in order to stimulate interest in the Holocaust among non-Jews. He chose five million because it was almost, but not quite, as large as six million. When Elie Wiesel asked Wiesenthal who these supposed five million victims were, Wiesenthal exploded and accused him of suffering from "Judeocentrism."" (Lipstadt, Deborah E. Simon Wiesenthal and the Ethics of History. Jewish Review of Books)
So there you have it straight from the horse's mouth. It turns out that the alleged "5,000,000 non-Jewish" victims of the Nazis were conjured out of thin air by the pathological liar, Simon "Nazi hunter" Wiesenthal, as a marketing ploy to stimulate non-Jewish interest in his bizarre gas chamber cult. A pure fiction!
When you tally all of those official reductions of HoloHoaxÂ deaths together — including the five million non-existent Gentile victims made up by Wiesenthal — you getÂ 11,326,000 invented, conjured, mythical, fictional victims of the Nazis! Through decades of tedious research and intense study, Holocaust Revisionist scholars have determined that somewhere between 300,000 and 500,000 people — both Jews and Gentiles — perished in the Nazis' labor and prison camps, largely due to malnutrition and disease that was a result, not of a Nazi extermination policy, but almost entirely due to the barbaric Allied saturation bombing of Germany and its supply lines which prevented key shipments of foodstuffs, medicines and other life-sustaining materials from making it to the camps.
Despite these monstrously over-inflated death figures being exposed as a farce decades ago, the magical "six million" figure bizarrely remains unchanged. That is because the six million figure has religious significance to Jews. Its origin is rooted in an ancient Torah prophecy that states 6,000,000 Jews first will perish in a fiery holocaust as a sacrifice to the tribal Jewish god Yahweh, before the Jews can make their gallant return to the "promised land" (Israel). (See: The Holocaust Dogma of Judaism by Ben Weintraub and )
Indeed, the kabbalistic fable of "6,000,000 dead or dying Jews" has been the staple of Zionist propaganda campaigns dating back to the late 19th century. (See: The First Holocaust by Don Heddesheimer and ) There are, in total, a staggering 147 references to "six million Jews" in the context of either being severely persecuted or in danger of being annihilated from 1900 through 1945. This clever propaganda was designed and disseminated by Zionist Jews — beginning shortly after the first Zionist congress in Basel, Switzerland in 1897 — to elicit sympathy and support for the creation of a Jewish State in Palestine on the ashes of the indigenous Arabs, which was accomplished on the back of this disgusting Jewish Hoaxâ„¢ in 1948. That's why, in 1900, arch-Zionist Rabbi Stephen S. Wise proclaimed:
"There are 6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism." ("Rabbi Wise's Address," New York Times, 1900)
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)