"Catholic bishops bless gay marriage rollback | Strange Bedfellows — Politics News - seattlepi.com"
The two bishops of the Catholic Archdiocese of Seattle, in a letter to the faithful, say they will deploy parishes to collect signatures for Referendum 74, a measure for the November ballot designed to roll back same-sex marriage in Washington.
...the bishops specifically deny that refusing marriage to same-sex couples equates to discrimination — an argument made by Gov. Christine Gregoire, a Catholic, in arguing for marriage equality.
"Treating different things differently is not unjust discrimination," the bishops claim. "Marriage can only be between a man and a woman because of its unique ends, purpose and place in society. The word 'marriage' isn't simply a label that can be attached to different types of relationships.
"Instead 'marriage' reflects a deep reality — the reality of the unique, fruitful, lifelong union that is only possible between a man and a woman. There is nothing else like it, and it can't be defined or made into something that it isn't."
However, this is the last line in the article: "As I read the Gospels, there is a great deal of talk about the poor, and none about homosexuality."
Here's my reply, which I posted on that article in the Facebook comments section:
"As I read the Gospels, there is a great deal of talk about the poor, and none about homosexuality."
Really? How long are you going to keep repeating that ignorant, twisting statement?
"And he said, That which cometh out of the man, that defileth the man. For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, Thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness: All these evil things come from within, and defile the man." (Mar 7:20-23)
Does that sound like a man (Jesus) who was saying to go ahead and be a sodomite to you? It sure doesn't to me.
I realize some people try to sugarcoat the term "fornications" (porneia) but it really did encompass sex out of wedlock even back then. Homosexuals were not married then.
So, you don't see homosexuality actually mentioned by that term. Do you see anywhere that Jesus said it was okay? No, you don't.
You may also read in the New Testament where those who were closest to him held a council on the subject of circumcision (a matter of Mosaic law). Show me the equivalent council back then over the subject of homosexuality (also a matter of Mosaic law). You can't do it. It's not there. The whole issue about Jesus's position on the subject is a marketing invention mostly pushed over the last several decades.
You can't possibly imagine that homosexuality wouldn't have been as big a controversy as circumcision.
The fact of the matter remains that sodomy, the main homosexual act, is disordered behavior. There's nothing anyone can say or do to alter it.
Homosexuals and their supporters can rail against those who state that fact. They can call them names. They can accuse them of hypocrisy, even without knowing the first thing about the person. They can duck, dodge, change the subject, and do all manner of things to attempt to deflect the fact, but it won't change it. Calling truth-tellers "homophobes" (a nonsense term) won't change it. Saying that those who speak out against the falsehood that is homosexuality are closet homosexuals won't change it. Cognitive dissonance isn't going to work.
Asking me why it's my business won't work. Children are being lied to by the pro-homosexuality movement. They are being harmed by those lies.
Asking what harm it does, as if it doesn't do any, won't work. The whole lifestyle is fraught with problems over and above those experienced in honest, monogamous, heterosexual marriages. Those problems do not come from prejudice against homosexuality. In nations where it is "affirmed and accepted," the same problems continue.
Where is the homosexual gene? It appears to have been thoroughly debunked. Regardless, change is definitely possible, else Jesus would not have called anyone to repent.
Homosexuals may call themselves married, but that won't alter the fact that the behavior is disordered.
Claiming that not all homosexuals engage in sodomy won't help them. A "less disordered" homosexual behavior is still disordered vis-a-vis an honest, monogamous, heterosexual marriage.
Claiming that female homosexuals experience fewer problems than do heterosexuals won't help either. The stats for female homosexuals in general are not good relative to heterosexuals.
Saying that some or even many heterosexuals engage in unhealthy behavior won't change the facts. If heterosexuals are engaging in unhealthy behavior, they should stop, just as the homosexuals should stop.
What people need to do is find out what causes homosexuality.
You should watch "Dr. Nicolosi Explains Reparative Therapy" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GcDl5y_ID0
He takes a bit to get on a roll, and some of it is redundant; but it's well worth watching. He's not coercing anyone that I can tell.
I'm only asking for people to speak the truth. I'm positive that the American Psychological Association (APA) has played fast and loose with the facts. Their former president, mentioned by Nicolosi in the video as the one who motioned that homosexuality no longer be said to be a disorder (disease), has come right out himself and said it. http://youtu.be/BPgq1c4TYi4 and http://youtu.be/RuyCT9ygT-4