The following videos have difficult audio. You'll need to turn up the volume. (Don't forget to turn it down afterwards.)
Obviously, NARTH and others need to bring forth live people who will attest to the exact opposite of what was alleged in the videos. Specifically, I mean people who won't simply say they are ex-gays but also heterosexuals: People who will say that they are happier and not the least bit depressed, etc., but overjoyed at the help they received via SOCE. Those people need to express how troubled they were and why, and it can't all be religious-based. I don't have the one-on-one in the numbers you people have had, but I'm sure there are people who were troubled for other than religious reasons.
Also, the tables must be turned 180 degrees. By that I mean that the same level of evidence for the allegations made against SOCE must be expected and demanded of those who are opposed to SOCE. The standards must be the same or be fundamentally unfair.
The psychiatrist struck me as effeminate. Shouldn't he have been asked? Also, the homosexual completely ducked the issue of his parents. The interviewer (Anderson Cooper) did not delve into that obviously because of his pro-homosexuality bias. That homosexual should be asked whether his father was distant and his mother the type Dr. Nicolosi has described. I would be particularly interested to know whether or not he was ever molested or sexually abused or even physically introduced to sex (or homosex) and especially at what age and by what gender. I say it that way because he may be the kind who would claim that early sexual activity, even of the homosexual kind, was something he "liked," possibly not being able to differentiate between hedonistic so-called pleasures on one hand and moral appreciation (or displeasure) on the other.
Most importantly, how many children are, or were, thoroughly confused and depressed and suicidal at having been molested by homosexuals and who now suffer or once suffered (pre-treatment) from same-sex attraction for reasons they don't/didn't understand and that compound/compounded their anxiety, etc.? Those children as children or now adults need to be allowed to come forth. The social environment needs to be made safe for them, as safe as for the homosexual in the videos, to speak out and to be heard by audiences as large as CNN's, etc. This politically charged issue is too important to be waged on a one-sided basis on CNN.
I didn't hear Anderson Cooper say that NARTH was invited but didn't respond or refused or what have you.
So in all the years NARTH has been practicing, CNN found two people? The other one who committed suicide, did he leave a note blaming NARTH? If not, upon what are they basing their claim that he died due to NARTH's treatment? People commit suicide over lots of different reasons. Why does it have to be because of NARTH's treatment? Regardless, is California going to outlaw every treatment where anyone later commits suicide when there's no evidence the treatment, per se, was the cause?
Based upon two suspect cases and no hard evidence in the form of studies disproving SOCE and California is going to outlaw, among other things, all teenagers' rights to seek help with SOCE? That's pure fascism in my book and extremely harmful in more ways than one: Talk about the fascist camel's nose under the tent.
In addition, why should people engaging in such aberrant behavior be cuddled to suit their self-esteem? Why should I feel better that the homosexual who was on CNN doesn't feel any longer that he engages in incorrect behavior and that he does so not by choice but because he was born that way? Where's the proof for the homosexual gene?
Where was the discussion about the problems with homosexuality that are there regardless of "acceptance," problems inherent in homosexuality that, all other things being equal, do not occur in heterosexuality? Human flesh is not free of problems, but it seems clear to me that we shouldn't choose to celebrate decidedly unhealthy behaviors, and that includes female homosexuals as well.
I'm certain that environment has vastly more to do with homosexuality than genetics, if genes have much if anything to do with it at all, all other things being equal.
There are plenty of other things that come to mind — questions — but that's enough for now.