George Osbornes recovery via austerity plan is undone amid crisis of capitalism | Business | The Guardian

George Osborne

The Marxist interpretation of the crisis goes as follows. By the 1970s, the post-war mixed economy model of capitalism had run out of steam. The long boom led to a lower rate of profit for capital as full employment meant workers received a bigger slice of the cake.

Unemployment coupled with the free-market reforms of the late 1970s and 1980s broke the power of industrial labour and shifted the focus of western economies from manufacturing to finance. Financial capitalism delivered higher profits, but only by suppressing wages. But since market economies can only function if there is sufficient demand for goods and services, a way had to be found to boost consumption. That was achieved through higher levels of personal debt, cheerfully provided by the newly liberalised financial services sector. Growth rates were kept artificially high, and the tax revenues thereby generated allowed governments to spend more than they could actually afford. To complete the picture, the debt was shifted across national borders by globalisation, so China would lend America the money to buy the cheap industrial products being made in the factories of east Asia, and Germany would do the same for the less competitive members of the eurozone, such as Greece and Spain.

There has been what another 19th-century thinker, Charles Darwin, identified as a process of natural selection. The stronger nations, which have retained a better balance between spending and consumption, and have nurtured their productive sectors, appear better able to survive than those nations which persistently lived beyond their means and used excessive debt to borrow growth from the future. Germany fits into the first category, while Britain is a classic example of the second.

Read the whole article: George Osbornes recovery via austerity plan is undone amid crisis of capitalism | Business | The Guardian.

The Brits and Americans were warned. I remember. I remember agreeing with those who did the warning at the time. We were going to ship our "dirty" industries offshore to places without labor rights, environmental protections, and other necessary regulations, and simply be an "information" economy, a "finance" economy, rather than cleaning up industrial processes at home and continuing to lead the world forward to greater and greater fairness rather than crashes, giant debts, and swelling poverty. Well, the economic, greedy airheads got their way instead.

What's really sad is that they are still being listened to. The people really are easily misled and duped. It's just astounding.

The only way out is debt-free money, but the powers that be refuse to discuss it in the mainstream media because the banksters would fall and the common people would rise as never before. So, if you aren't a bankster and if you want the common people to rise as never before, then promote debt-free money to replace Federal Reserve Notes and the euro, etc. It's very doable.

Coins are debt-free, and paper money and cyber money could be just as easily: no more National Debts -- all paid off immediately; no more taxes going to pay interest on National Debts. We could also avoid all deflation and inflation via real-time controls on supply and velocity.

I've spelled it all out on this site, but the superrich suppress the information in the mainstream and the "alternative" press is very slow to pick it up — too stuck in their ways.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Libertarian Capitalism, Monetary Reform, United States Notes. Bookmark the permalink.