"Solar Power Revolution - Here Comes the Sun" and Monetary Reform / Public Banking: Imagine

Watch the following, and then click the link to consider Monetary Reform and Public Banking (banks as a public utility). Consider all of that in combination, and imagine the potential that is right now being denied us but that, if we don't destroy ourselves first via utterly stupid selfishness (which necessarily includes so-called "pure" capitalism), is all inevitable. You will note that the German politician, Hermann Scheer, is a socialist yet obviously vastly smarter and more forward thinking than Ron Paul and all the other hyper-capitalists.

Solar Power Revolution - Here Comes The Sun --
Documentary - YouTube

Read and watch: Where does "money" come from? Do you want to know?

The money they are talking about using for hospitals and schools in that second linked video can certainly be used to fund energy projects such that all the energy needs and even wants of humanity can be provided debt-free and at zero charge -- no energy bills at all. It's the truth. Only the stupid greedy throwbacks are holding it back. With United States Notes and a proper Monetary Authority (real-time computer program) and working democracy, we could be completely debt free and have all the sustainable energy we want or need.

I've been a backer of solar desalination plants for decades. Now, there is no excuse.

Everything Hermann Scheer said is correct in this regard. The carbon corporations will not be able to hold this back and will not be able to compete. They are the buggy whip to solar, wind, geothermal, etc.'s car key.

If, no when, we do it right, we will eliminate all poverty. Don't tell me that's not Biblical either. Jesus said that the poor you will always have with you, but he was speaking about before Heaven comes to Earth. When humanity stops being selfish and rather embraces the spirit, the mentality, that is God's, our problems will clear up. That's the message. Believe it. Do it. I want it. No one is coercing me. I want it voluntarily. The only question is that if you don't want it, why don't you?

Let's bring it in. The "demons" will fight against it, but so what? We will win in the end, as prophesied.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Libertarian Capitalism, Monetary Reform, United States Notes. Bookmark the permalink.