It isn't stopping with gay, phobic, and the rainbow. It's marriage and human rights. Human rights is anti-freedom of religion now to them, and they are busy in the public school stealthily and not so stealthily indoctrinating all children they can in the way of hating Jesus.
And Pilate again answered and said unto them, What then shall I do unto him whom ye call the King of the Jews? And they cried out again, Crucify him. And Pilate said unto them, Why, what evil hath he done? But they cried out exceedingly, Crucify him. And Pilate, wishing to content the multitude, released unto them Barabbas, and delivered Jesus, when he had scourged him, to be crucified. (Mark 15:12-15)
That is what is happening — same mind-set.
After filing the complaint Thursday with the Illinois Department of Human Rights, Jacob Meister, Governing Board President of The Civil Rights Agenda (TCRA) said that Chick-fil-A's stance on marriage was to blame for a widespread stigmatization of homosexual individuals.
"In our current high speed media and social media environment, Chick-fil-A has announced and caused to be published, to hundreds of millions of people, that LGBT people are unacceptable and objectionable," said Meister. "They have made it clear the lives of LGBT individuals are unacceptable to them and that same-gender families are unwelcome at Chick-fil-A." The attorney alleged that Chick-fil-A's "intolerant corporate culture" violated Illinois law.
Chick-fil-A hires and promotes homosexuals. Chick-fil-A never asks anyone whether or not he or she is a homosexual before serving the person.
What this attorney is attempting to do is make it against the law to be a Christian in the public sphere. He would take away Jesus's right to preach in public to the masses. Were Jesus here today saying this, as he said then, "Ye serpents, ye offspring of vipers, how shall ye escape the judgment of hell?" (Matthew 23:33), this Jacob Meister would attempt to haul him before the current iteration of the Sanhedrin to be tried and convicted in yet another kangaroo court and served up to imprisonment and punishment (and even to calls for his death again) were Jesus not to repent of his religion he founded and for which many, many Peace Churches came to the United States to find refuge from the likes of the Jacob Meister's of the world — persecutors of those who believe in the power of God to deliver homosexuals from their sinful addiction and confusion, disease, and morally corrupt, corrupting, and harmful ways.
No,Â Jacob Meister, males sodomizing each other is not okay, whether you like it or not. It's sick, period. There is nothing you can do to change that, Jacob.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble,Â and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." That's the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. It's the first article of the Bill of Rights. It was the first because it was and remains the highest priority of the nation-state.Â Jacob Meister wants to throw it out so his friends may sodomize each other without anyone even being able openly to state that they should not be doing that.Â Jacob Meister hates Jesus Christ and whether Jacob has realized that or not.Â Jacob Meister is against the righteousness of Jesus Christ.Â Jacob Meister teaches the opposite of Jesus's teachings. He is an anti-Christ.
Jesus asks you, Jacob, Ye serpent, ye offspring of vipers, how shall ye escape the judgment of hell? Think about it.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)