The following open reply should be fairly self-explanatory:
In response to your "One World Sexuality ...for all" Facebook Group invitation, let me make the following perfectly clear.
The last issue between us on the Facebook NARTH Group was California SB 1172 and children even raped and then suffering from unwanted same-sex sexual arousal as a result and whether or not those children would have the legal right under the secular law to in California, obtain professional, licensed, mental-healthcare-provider therapy for that condition. You knew that but repeatedly refused to say they should have that right. Therefore, for that reason and others (in my view, many misrepresentations on your part concerning the NARTH Group on Facebook and more), you are on the dark side on it and your new group is based upon deceptions and falsehoods.
My personal sense at this point about you is that you are highly likely looking for being accepted as a homosexual, that perhaps you want to come back out of the closet and be affirmed by the whole of society in your homosexual behavior, including being accepted in that by even me. If that's the case (perhaps it's not), it's not going to happen. I reject homosexuality, period; and it's going to stay that way.
Let me know if you turn to God, Jesus Christ's father and my father, and repent. Otherwise, unless you want help from me in doing that, I would prefer not hearing from you again in the general course of events.
May God bless you with the real truth, which you do not now have, neither are you leading anyone to it but quite the opposite.
Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project
Ordinarily, I would not publish something like this in the open but rather respond privately. Patrick though writes in the About section of his new Facebook Group the following:
There is a way, there is a full form; not yet fully expanded, not having reached its maximum extents, mostly not worked-out , still ambiguously inconclusive, misleading or contradictory, confusing and contrasting... but; it is out there, somewhere in the not to distant future, impressed in the biological plausibility of our bodies and minds, to where all of today's sexual expressions among people can have their unanimously accepted and enjoyed moments by anybody, circumstantially and proportionately appropriate by everyone's natural sense of when and why.
That to me says that he is asking people to accept homosex, to not say that homosex does not belong, to not say that homosex is a fundamental error. It actually says more than that if you will consider everything that it allows: pedophilia, etc.
There is a great deal more I could say about all of this, but the NARTH Group is a closed group; and aside from explaining directly the bit above about California SB 1172, which is a homosexual fascistic bit of legislation that is extremely dangerous to the civil liberties Americans now enjoyed under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, I don't wish to go into a grey area concerning the group where I would be possibly violating the desired privacy of others who wish to openly discuss and explore NARTH and Reparative Therapy, etc., without being subjected to hyperactive homosexual activists dancing all about the issues, refusing to be pinned down on anything substantive.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. — First Amendment to the United States Constitution