United States Notes and bottom-up-and-cross-and-down political economy

Two fabulous videos to watch and to combine because they (the so-called power elite) aren't willing yet to listen to others and to me about United States Notes and bottom-up-and-cross-and-down political economy:


Many of the things discussed in both of those videos can be, and will eventually be, globalized. Debt-free currency will be the only currency in the world someday. Growing food and supplying everyone with plenty of very healthy, free food will be the only way food is provided in the world someday.

When I was a boy, I had a saying of my own: "Someday is no day." Well, that was then. This is a new day. It is a new beginning. And for those who may be tempted to complain to me because I'm saying this while also saying I'm a Christian, none of it is inherently anti-Christ, quite the contrary.

There will be a New World Order. The question is not whether or not but what kind.

It is really a shame that professing Christians are not out front on this leading the way. I started the Christian Commons, what feels like ages ago now, and how many tens of thousands of "Christians" have come by this site and read about the Christian Commons only to turn their backs?

Well, if self-styled (read fake and phony) Christians won't help, I'll work with those people who will.

To all those who claim to be both Christian and laissez-faire, mega-corporatist capitalist, what do you think this means anyway? "The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said to be bountiful." — Isaiah 32:5.

Do you know what a churl is? Do you think the people featured in those two videos are more or less churlish than Murray Rothbard was? If you don't think they are vastly less churlish and vastly closer to Jesus (regardless of their own religious beliefs, which I have not checked), I feel sorry for you.

Those videos don't say they are anti-capitalist. I am, but I'm not coercive if I can help it. What those videos are, are representations of people trying to find, and actually finding, alternative pathways to what the power elite have created that brought on the economic crash and will do so again and again until they've consolidated the whole of human kind under them as debt-and-wage slaves in a dying world-dystopia.

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Libertarian Capitalism, Monetary Reform, United States Notes. Bookmark the permalink.