On Monday, December 3, 2012, U.S. District Court Judge William Shubb issued a preliminary injunction against the State of California which blocks California SB 1172 from taking effect on January 1, 2013 concerning three parties to a law suit against the state.
SB 1172 is designed to make it illegal for California licensed mental healthcare practitioners to treat minors in California for the minors' unwanted same-sex attraction (homosexuality) and regardless of whether or not such minors suffer from same-sex attraction as a result of homosexual sexual abuse perpetrated upon them.
Judge Shubb ruled that the First Amendment rights of the plaintiffs concerning Reparative Therapy would be violated under SB 1172. "Even if SB 1172 is characterized as primarily aimed at regulating conduct, it also extends to forms of (conversion therapy) that utilize speech and, at a minimum, regulates conduct that has an incidental effect on speech," wrote Shubb.
SB 1172 proponents based the legislation on anecdotal information about supposed causal links between the therapy and risk of suicide and depression. The judge said the reasoning is based on "questionable and scientifically incomplete studies." Many people remain depressed and even suicidal after other therapies that are not banned. Regardless, SB 1172 did not take into account the many thousands of people who have benefited and are satisfied with the treatment they received.
Judge Shubb noted the plaintiffs would likely prevail in getting the law struck down on constitutional grounds.
"We know we will have to have another hearing on the merits, but to be able to get a preliminary injunction at this stage is very telling as to the final outcome, and I'm very encouraged by it." -- Brad Dacus, President, Pacific Justice Institute, which represents the plaintiffs: psychiatrist Anthony Duk, therapist Donald Welch, and Aaron Bitzer.
Lawyers for California claim current versions of Reparative Therapy practiced by authentic therapists has been rejected as unproven. That is false propaganda. If it were unproven, there would not be thousands who testify as to the radical changes in their lives concerning unwanted same-sex attraction.
You will also note that homosexual activists have largely insisted to this point that the treatment is always harmful while the mental health associations they cite say that it may be harmful, not has been proven harmful. No proof of harm has been forthcoming, only statements of people who want others to conclude that their depression was caused by the treatment, by not being affirmed in their homosexuality.
However, even if those people did suffer depression by not being affirmed, that does not address the rights of those who suffer depression at being affirmed in homosexuality but who know they were heterosexual before they were homosexually abused â€” had homosexuality conditioned into them just as Pavlov's dogs were conditioned to salivate at the ringing of a bell.
See also: "Sandusky Laws": California SB 1172 & Other Evil Homosexual Plans (contains additional relevant links at its bottom)