Zionist Jews v. Non-Zionist Jews

Zionist Jews call non-Zionist Jews "self-hating Jews." What is the opposite of a so-called "self-hating Jew" as used by the Zionists but a narcissistic Jew, an egotistical Jew, a supremacist Jew, an ethnically bigoted Jew, a racist Jew, a land-thieving Jew, an ethnic-cleansing Jew, and anti-Christ Jew, a deceptive and deceitful Jew? I'd rather all the Jews in the world first come to loathe themselves for all of their sins and confusion rather than suffer all of the unrepentant, narcissistic, egotistical, supremacist, ethnically bigoted, racist, land-thieving, ethnic-cleansing, anti-Christ, deceptive, deceitful Jews. Join me in thanking God that there are non-Zionist Jews!

Every non-Zionist Jew is not perfect, but at least they don't have to overcome the evil spirit of Zionism dwelling within them: one less legion of demons to be exorcized.

A story of a new beginning for the coming New Year: Being born again, freed from the bondage of evil, a major blessing and no curse at all

And they came over unto the other side of the sea, into the country of the Gadarenes. And when he was come out of the ship, immediately there met him out of the tombs a man with an unclean spirit, Who had his dwelling among the tombs; and no man could bind him, no, not with chains: Because that he had been often bound with fetters and chains, and the chains had been plucked asunder by him, and the fetters broken in pieces: neither could any man tame him. And always, night and day, he was in the mountains, and in the tombs, crying, and cutting himself with stones. But when he saw Jesus afar off, he ran and worshipped him, And cried with a loud voice, and said, What have I to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of the most high God? I adjure thee by God, that thou torment me not. For he said unto him, Come out of the man, thou unclean spirit. And he asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many. And he besought him much that he would not send them away out of the country.

Now there was there nigh unto the mountains a great herd of swine feeding. And all the devils besought him, saying, Send us into the swine, that we may enter into them. And forthwith Jesus gave them leave. And the unclean spirits went out, and entered into the swine: and the herd ran violently down a steep place into the sea, (they were about two thousand;) and were choked in the sea. And they that fed the swine fled, and told it in the city, and in the country. And they went out to see what it was that was done. And they come to Jesus, and see him that was possessed with the devil, and had the legion, sitting, and clothed, and in his right mind: and they were afraid. And they that saw it told them how it befell to him that was possessed with the devil, and also concerning the swine. And they began to pray him to depart out of their coasts.

And when he was come into the ship, he that had been possessed with the devil prayed him that he might be with him. Howbeit Jesus suffered him not, but saith unto him, Go home to thy friends, and tell them how great things the Lord hath done for thee, and hath had compassion on thee. And he departed, and began to publish in Decapolis how great things Jesus had done for him: and all men did marvel. (Mark 5:1-20)

Isn't that marvelous in your eyes!

Fellow Christians, remember that many other fellow Christians are Palestinian Arabs. How do any of you side with their persecutors rather than with your siblings in Christ Jesus? As for John Hagee and the other self-styled Christian-Zionists who quote Genesis in support of their Zionism {"And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed. (Genesis 12:3)"}, the truth is not a curse on the Jews. The truth is a blessing upon the Jews. "He that hath ears to hear, let him hear."

Blessed are the pigs that would rather drowned themselves in the sea than be corrupted from within by the evil spirits coming out from the heart of confused mankind, whether self-hating or self-loving.

Legion was self-hating for the right reasons. Jesus enlightened him so that Legion could learn how to overcome the confusion and so that the devil, who is many, would leave him. Wonderful!

And who are the real Jews but those who follow their rightful king, Jesus Christ?

Update 1:

Just to clarify, my point to Vern Radul, (which I requested we take elsewhere to debate before he took offense at being asked not to use obscene language on my Facebook timeline and actually immaturely blocked me for doing), was that his pantheism of a unified god where God is seen as the author of evil doesn't appear to me to be a useful argument to use on either the Jewish or Christian Zionists, so-called. If God were as Vern claims, a conclusion I don't reach at all, then the Zionists, "Jewish" or otherwise, would be no morally wrong than they are now. In fact, they would then appear to be right in simply taking, as might would not make right but neither would it make wrong. It would simply be Social Darwinism. Yes, from Vern's position, one could argue the practicality of being hostile, that it is counter-productive to not being attacked oneself, but that would simply be countered with "just be mightier and strike first and everywhere," the megalomaniacal mindset, just as valid where there is no moral God but rather a god playing hide and seek with itself out of boredom rather than God whose own perspective and comprehension is beyond our own at present, including well beyond Vern's "Alan Watts," author of, "The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are."

On the other hand, if we start from the position that there are Jews who've chosen to live under Zionism in Israel or elsewhere and if we start from the position that those Jews do not want to be wrong vis-a-vis God, then showing them where they are in fact wrong in that regard, provided they are capable of overcoming their selfish desires so they may then embrace God and be embraced by God, will in my view, stand a much greater chance of reaching them with right action following than simply telling them that God doesn't exist but that there is only one god and it is everything, including the root essence of evil. The same applies to self-styled Christian Zionists.

I do not believe that I am the root essence of evil but that I've simply deliberately chosen to self-inflict with amnesia for the sake of experiencing the emotions of this thing I'm going through called life in the flesh. I can't speak for how others view themselves on it, but I don't find myself being a masochist by nature or by nurture, quite the contrary. Are we taking on different natures one "life" after another without results, without changing us/me. Okay, that game is over. Now I'm back to being the root of all good and the root of all bad and all-knowing, etc. For this next game of solitaire, I will ... annihilate myself with no end of game, which of course will mean that you will all be annihilated too forever. Do you really believe that?

I am not a figment of Vern's imagination or will or lack thereof. He wants to claim that when he looks at me, he is seeing himself. I say he doesn't see me or hear me. I'm hidden, and that's not my doing. The problem lies in Vern's heart, which hates Jesus, obviously; and anyone who hates Jesus, is at least for the time doing that, of the root essence of evil and not part of me at all.

Just as a little background, I met Vern Radul via the "Out of Iraq Bloggers Caucus (OOIBC)." He and I interacted every once in a while, and to my knowledge, there was never a bit of ill-will, none showing on the surface at least. There was none hidden on my part. I knew he wasn't a Christian, but I had thought (or at least hoped) he was the kind of non-Christian who wouldn't block someone for being an honest truth-seeking Christian, which I hope and believe I am. I do not block honest truth-seeking atheists or others. I won't agree that they've found the ultimate truth because the ultimate truth is God (and not Vern's version but Jesus's), but so long as the other will stand for everyone having the right to seek the truth, then I will stand for that with them. I will stand for that without Vern.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe
  • Ads are not endorsed.

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Holocaust. Bookmark the permalink.