Obama To Be Sworn In On Queen James Bible?

When the homosexuals at the misnomered ThinkProgress.org tell Barack Obama to stoop, he asks them, "How low?"


Pastor pulls out of Obama inauguration benediction - latimes.com.

Look, if those homosexual activists are so serious about taking over and if Obama is so serious about going along with the homosexual agenda for the nation, if Obama is so in line with homosexuality, that it's okay with Jesus Christ and all of the Apostles and with the early Church Fathers, then let those homosexual fascists openly demand that Obama take the oath of office with his hand on the new Queen James Bible, which the homosexuals have come up with claiming that it is the real version of Jesus's and even Paul's message, and let Barack Obama do it.

What Bible is Obama going to use instead (because he's a liar and coward)? Will he use the one that says, "For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders." (Mark 7:21) He sure will. He's going to be using President Abraham Lincoln's Bible. It contains those words of Jesus Christ.

What homosexual in the time of Jesus Christ wasn't either an adulterer or fornicator when he or she engaged in sex with someone of the same sex? The answer is none! It was sin then, and it's still sin now.

Barack Obama is a huge hypocrite. Of course, who didn't know that?

The homosexual activists who claim Christianity is okay with homosex are all liars! They are all sinners, per Jesus Christ, who was right and still is. He was right about righteousness across-the-board, and no amount of twisting and censoring and altering of his words will change that, ever.

Why? "For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife." (Mark 10:7) That's why. That's real marriage. That's the right way. Everything else is twisted, Satanic, unGodly, the result of evil!

You don't think it matters? You think that the people of America and elsewhere can continue becoming more and more and more wicked and suffer no negative consequences? If so, you're a fool.

Watch what happens if this trend to greater and greater iniquity continues. You will be shocked, but there will be many among you who will still refuse to believe.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.