The American public educational system has been contorted so that under the guise of comfortable speech, political correctness, and other such things, ethical academic freedom, freedom of inquiry, and the like, have been sacrifice to promote sexual error.
There is no doubt whatsoever that anal intercourse is an error. Homosexual males as a so-called community would not give it up. I won't belabor the point here. What I am going to do is show you the results of the American public educational system that has been involved in homosexualizing the youth since mostly the 1980's and that in doing so, has turned many people raised up in that system into people who cannot and/or who refuse to follow an argument or debate to save their souls.
Here is an example:
I received a link from someone who is a prime example of the homosexualization process. His pattern is ignoring logic and truth.
You need to understand that I had already been through the entire issue with him, completely answering every question he ever put to me on the subject of homosexuality. What he has continually done, is ignore even those things concerning which he has agreed and done so, so that he imagines he may remain comfortable in his confusion.
You can follow unrepentant homosexual Ellen DeGeneres or Jesus. You can't follow both to Heaven. The path she is promoting to you doesn't lead there. Are you going to remain with her or come over to Jesus's side? Those are your only options.
What are afraid of?
What are YOU afraid of?
I don't like evil. Why are you against Jesus's teachings?
I am not. His words are certainly important. They didnt have tape recorders back then so maybe some of his words were lost in translation. I cant believe that an all loving God wouldnt love ALL his people. That just doesnt make sense to me. And i refuse to accept a world view that alienates 30+% of the world. Bigotry, racism, any kind of prejudice is what is evil.
Look, [deleted], you already said all of that. So why do you keep sending me homosexual links?
You don't believe the canonical Gospels are accurate that Jesus condemned fornication or adultery. So to you, he may have thought multiple sex partners, married or not, and including of either sex (and what was to preclude animals and little children and dead bodies and a sister and a mother and brother and God knows what else that the missing tape recorder didn't capture for you) was all fine. Your arguments against the fact that homosex is wrong are illogical. Nevertheless, you write as one who wouldn't believe Jesus if he were to come right to you and were to tell you to your face.
God does not have to accept homosex to please you in order to be God. Homosex is disordered for obvious reasons. If you want to take it up your rear end by some guy, you have a mental and spiritual problem that you need to overcome. That's how it is. No amount of complaining against a God who doesn't tell you that it's okay for you to take it up the rear is going to alter the truth.
You are afraid. You are afraid to stand up and to tell males that their sodomizing each other is wrong, even though you know that it is wrong. That's a sin.
You aren't prejudice? Then let the unrepentant active male homosexual pedophiles move in with your family right now if you love pedophiles the way you think God loves them, if you're so fine with whatever anyone does sexually. Let them sleep with your children. You wouldn't be the first father to do that evil to his children.
It's a shame you think God isn't disgusted by any human sexual iniquity. It's a shame you even imagine Jesus could be okay with adultery or fornication, as if all of his words in the Gospels aren't wholly consistent.
How long are you going to keep sending me homosexual links, [deleted]? What's your point? What are you trying to accomplish, to tempt me (the way Satan tried to tempt Jesus) to fall with you? It isn't going to happen.
Why don't you join Jesus instead? Why don't you fall on your face and tell God you are truly sorry for everything you've ever done and ask God to heal you of your sexual problems? Repentance and perseverance, [deleted], that's what it takes.
Love and truth are the same thing. That homosexuality is fine is a lie, and there's no real love in it. Ask God.
There's nothing further to say to you on it. I've told you enough for anyone to get it who can receive Jesus's truth on it. If you reject Jesus's truth, that's you. I'm not going with you on it, ever.
May God bless you with the truth. May you stop blaspheming the God and Father of Jesus Christ. May you stop pretending to yourself that you are wiser than Jesus about homosex or anything else. Amen.
Nope. I am not afraid - not of what you mention at least. I don't know why you always go to pedophilia. To me that is extremely weird.
If "Jesus" said "follow me over this cliff" would you go? You are wrong. If thinking the way I do is wrong then I don't want to be write. Ziggy said something to that effect (oh he was GAY! and so was his "author"). There I go again..
You think we are the only living beings in the Universe? No way. There is just too much "space" for that to mathematically be true. You and I aren't even a "blip" on the screen's radar. We are so insignificant. You think differently (obviously). Thoughts of grandeur in terms of your self image I am sure. That is typical of folks with various behavioral disorders.
I am not trying to tempt you in any way shape or form. That must be a product of your paranoia.
Peace be with you
If thinking the way I do is wrong then I don't want to be RIGHT"
As usual, you ducked the point -- your pattern.
When you defend any sexual error, you don't have the luxury of avoiding discussing the others. Are you prejudice against homosexual pedophiles or not? Are you prejudice against any sort of sexual behavior at all? You are, but you said all prejudice is evil, which shows your confusion. Yet, you don't want to admit to yourself that you are confused. That's the point that you have consistently ducked in very bad argumentation form.
You are of a generation that has been mis-trained concerning critical-thinking skills, which skills you term "weird." Consistency of thought is weird to you. I am opposed to all sexual error. You are not prejudice against any; but then again, you are.
Your generation has been mis-taught to be comfortable with what is wrong, and that has only served to make things worse.
You don't answer questions. I asked you why you keep sending homosexual-promoting links. You don't answer.
What kind of mind is it that asks another person whether he would follow Jesus over a cliff? What cliff? Do you consider going to the cross analogous to going over a cliff to die in both flesh and soul? If so, and I believe that is your thinking, it is just more ignorance and confusion in your head and heart.
As far as your "Ziggy" reference, what are you alleging about God now?
Also, where did being alone in the universe come into this on my part? It didn't.
Look, your continually sending spiritually Satanic links to me that promote the error of males sodomizing each other, something you apparently have no problem with, is designed to cause a fight because you have your own deep-seated sexual problems that you are obviously avoiding dealing with but are rather rationalizing about it, and extremely poorly at that.
So, if you are not interested in actually answering my questions and actually seeing in your statements and answers your confusion, there is zero point in my discussing this issue with you ever again.
Finally, your knowledge of the Gospel message concerning temptation is sorely lacking.
As I said to you before, you go with your bugger friends. I'll go with Jesus. We shall see who ends up being the one who blindly followed the blind into the ditch.
Why doesn't God straighten you out? Why don't you ask him? Are you able to even do that?
"Nope. I am not afraid - not of what you mention at least." Really, when and where have you stood up and told males that their sodomizing each other is wrong? Would you do that in a large group of homosexual sodomizers? I have. I've done it with my identity right there for all to see to connect me with my statement and my consistent convictions across-the-board (on that and much more -- many, many different issues). Have you? Would you? If so, do it.
Obama To Be Sworn In On Queen James Bible?
Washington Cathedral: Same-Sex Satanism
Stanford Law: Interracial v. Same-Sex Marriage
Homosexual Activists Openly Admit Change
The Good Samaritan Tells You Homosex is Sin
Homosexuality: Trolley Co. Drops Weddings: God's Work
Where NARTH Stands and What Must Be Done: "Gay," Homosexual Culture
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)