FYI: US Farm Bill: GMO Labeling, Factory Farms, ...

Subject: Farm Bill Vote Resumes Today. Contact Your Senators about GMO Labeling, Factory Farms, and More!
From: Organic Consumers Association
Date: 6/3/2013 5:11 AM

Today, Monday, June 3, the Senate returns from its Memorial Day recess to vote on more amendments to the 2013 Farm Bill. Your Senators' votes will have an impact on everything from labeling genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and banning genetically engineered salmon, to protecting honeybees, curbing the over-use of antibiotics on factory farm animals and allowing U.S. farmers to grow industrial hemp.

Please choose the issues you're most concerned about (grouped below by topic), then call your Senators at (202) 224-3121 (click here to send an email [ ]) to let them know how you'd like them to vote, and why.

You can say:

"Hello, my name is ___ and I'm a constituent and a voter. I would like to leave a message for Senator ___'s agriculture staffer. Can you take a message for me, please? When amendments to the 2013 Farm Bill are voted on this week, I'd like Senator ___ to vote to ...

• ... label genetically engineered food." (Support Boxer Amendments 1025 and 1026)
• ... repeal the Monsanto Protection Act." (Support Merkley Amendment 978)
• ... ban genetically engineered salmon." (Support Begich Amendment 934)

• ... save the honeybees." (Support Boxer Amendment 1027)

• ... give organic farmers equal access to funds for environmental improvement." (Support Leahy Amendment 1093)

• ... add climate change mitigation to conservation programs." (Support Whitehouse Amendment 1058)

• ... address factory farms' drug abuse problem, responsible for antibiotic-resistant superbugs that infect hundreds of thousands and kill tens of thousands of Americans each year." (Support Gillibrand Amendment 940)
• ... reign in the factory farm and meatpacking cartels that subject contract farmers to abusive practices that reduce food quality, animal welfare and worker safety." (Support Grassley Amendment 969, Rockefeller Amendment 993, Tester Amendment 971, and Enzi Amendments 981 and 982)

• ... legalize industrial hemp." (Support Wyden Amendment 952)

• ... increase funding for eat-local and farm-to-consumer programs." (Support Brown Amendment 1088)

• ... stop attempts to take food assistance from hungry families." (Oppose Sessions Amendments 946 and 947, Roberts Amendments 949 and 950, Thune Amendment 991, Coburn Amendments 100, 1002, 1005, and 1009, and Vitter Amendment 1056)

• ... place long-overdue limits of $50,000 on crop insurance premium subsidies for America's wealthiest large-scale farmers." (Support Shaheen Amendment 926)

• ... make sure farmers who get federal money for irrigation aren't wasting water." (Support Udall Amendment 1049)

Thanks for calling (202-224-3121) and emailing (click here [ ]) your Senators!

If you read Organic Bytes on Thursday, you know that Monsanto has been getting its way with the Senate. Lawmakers voted down an amendment to affirm the existing right of states to label genetically engineered food and have, so far, blocked a vote on repealing the Monsanto Protection Act.

If you haven't already...

Please find out how your Senators voted on the Sanders Amendment in support of states' rights to label GMOs and call and email them to let them know what you think. [ ]

Please call and email Senators Cochran and Blunt to ask them to stop blocking a vote on Senator Merkley's Amendment to repeal the Monsanto Protection Act. [ ]

Sign our petition opposing the King Amendment and any other attempt by Congress to take away states' rights to label GMOs. [ ]

More bad news...

The Food Research and Action Center reports that Senator Kirsten Gillibrand's (D-NY) amendment to restore $4.1 billion/ten year in cuts to nutrition assistance for hungry families was defeated by a 70-26 vote.

Some good news...

At least one good thing has happened during Senate votes on Farm Bill amendments. The National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition reports:

"Because of calls from grassroots advocates like you, the Senate passed an amendment – the Durbin-Coburn amendment – that takes a bold first step towards reforming ballooning crop insurance subsidies for wealthy mega-farms in the 2013 Farm Bill!

"Calls from constituents helped encourage 59 Senators to support this common-sense, long overdue amendment. Even better, it will save taxpayers over 1.3 billion dollars and will ensure maximum support goes only to those who need it, not a handful of mega-farms."

Constituent communications work! Please call (202-224-3121) and email (click here [ ]) your Senators today!

Alexis Baden-Mayer, Esq.
Political Director

Organic Consumers Association [ ]

6771 South Silver Hill Drive - Finland, MN 55603 - Phone: 218-226-4164 - Fax: 218-353-7652 Follow OCA: Twitter [ ] | Facebook [ ] | Pinterest [ ]


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.