Why I Just Left Al Gore's "Climate Reality Project" (Anti-Anthropogenic Global Warming)

I just left Al Gore's anti-Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) "Climate Reality Project" because Mr. Gore is conflating pro-homosexuality with anti-global warming. I oppose homosex for a whole host of reasons, not the least of which are scientific. I doubt Mr. Gore has even a tenth the knowledge on the subject has he has on global warming. I am opposed to global warming, but I do not want to be told I am a homophobe by Mr. Gore while helping him combat global warming. I can and have combatted it without him and will continue to do so.

Tom Usher

Tom Usher

The term "homophobia" was coined to plant the wrong seed that anyone who opposes homosex has an irrational fear of homosexuals. I don't have an irrational fear of homosexuals.

I could write a book here; but, to the point, I see the homosexual movement as having turned decidedly fascistic. I'm far from alone on that. "According to a recent Rasmussen poll, 85% of Americans support the right of the photographer to say no" to having to photograph a homosexual wedding or the like. However, the court in New Mexico just said that a Christian photographer cannot refuse a contract with a homosexual couple to shoot their event. I fully understand the Constitutional arguments, but Mr. Gore appears to be among the group that is ramming homosex down society's throat regardless of one of the founding tenets of the United States: freedom of religion. He appears to be among the group saying that homosex (a fundamental error, as men sodomizing each other is a self-evident mistake) trumps religion.

My New Testament words of Jesus Christ specifically state that a man leaves his parents to marry that man's wife, not his husband. That's just the tip of what I know about this. I've fought as much against the falsehood that homosexuals are born that way as I have fought against the falsehood that burning carbon fuels is harmless or even good.

I hate to leave the Climate Reality Project, but frankly, I think it has made clear that my views are not welcome.

If Mr. Gore changes his mind and approach and clearly stops mixing his homosexual activism with his fight against AGW, I will gladly rejoin his efforts with him.

This is not my attempt to censor him but more so to suggest that Christians who believe Jesus's definition of marriage as being exclusively between one man and one woman and who also believe in what we call "Creation Care" should not be insulted with terms such as "homophobe" from Mr. Gore. He is only harming the cause in doing so.

I do not hate Mr. Gore, though I obviously disagree with him about homosex. In fact, I stated openly at the time that Bill Clinton should resign so that Mr. Gore could assume the Presidency. I considered and still consider Mr. Gore as more intelligent than was or is Mr. Clinton. I also loved the way Mr. Gore stood up against George W. Bush's policies and practices in ways Mr. Clinton could not for reasons of Mr. Clinton's own shortcomings. By the way, Mr. Gore won the election and was the duly elected President of the US. I disagreed with the Supreme Courts political actions. The recount in Florida should have gone on to conclusion before the winner was decided. That is the position that court should have taken.

Tom Usher

You may read Mr. Gore's anti-Christ words here: Al Gore explains why he's optimistic about stopping global warming


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
    • Irv Spielberg

      Gore's Global Warming Secret

      You'll never guess what initially inspired Al Gore's "temperature" mania - the one that's raised our tempers.
      Well, Gore is from Tennessee where you can hear Bible belt preachers warning about "Hell fire" in the next life.

      And Gore, concerned about this life, is surrounded by those who also
      know about the prediction in Revelation (chapter 16) of the coming time
      when a change in the sun will result in humans being "scorched with
      great heat"!
      It wouldn't be convenient if folks were to discover
      that Gore, a liberal, was influenced by the handbook closely associated
      with Christian fundamentalists!
      If Tennessee fundy preachers
      could look at the same predictions-packed apocalyptic book and stretch
      forward in time some future events, Gore could surely do the same thing
      and stretch forward the "great heat" and turn it into cold cash.

      All of us are well aware of the incredible influence that the
      Gore-orrhea plague has had on the whole world including the White House!
      But Gore's overlooked another Bible verse which says that "there is nothing hid that shall not be revealed."
      The real "inconvenient truth" is that the SS Al Gore is now stuck in ice - and what we need is a Gorebreaker!