Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby's Dangerous Homosexuality Confusion

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, is fretting over the following (his statement):

...the vast majority of people under 35 think not only that what we are saying is incomprehensible but also think that we are plain wrong and wicked and equate it to racism and other forms of gross and atrocious injustice.

Source: Archbishop urges Christians to 'repent' over 'wicked' attitude to homosexuality - Telegraph

The youth have been systematically conditioned to think incorrectly on the subject. They have been brought up by the system to be unable to see the fact that two men buggering each other is a fundamental, self-evident error. They have been brought up to place license to sexual error above statements of fact and truth. They have been brought up to clamor for so-called rights to buggery and other acts while avoiding statements of truth, such as what I just said that two men buggering each other is a fundamental, self-evident error. They have been brought up to dance all about the truth and to simply cave into the temptation to agree with evil/error. They have been systematically mis-taught that homosexuality is harmless and that it is about love rather than confusion and quite often, even vastly most often, sexual lust a result of conditioning from abuse and neglect, not genetics or epigenetics. They have been brought up to misbelieve and to promote that there is no such thing as the slippery slope, which slippery slope is grossly evident already and becoming more so with each passing day.

Those are all things that the Archbishop apparently never understood or is allowing to slip from his mind because of his dread at his church losing so many followers to the very evil he appears to be embracing. His is exactly the way souls are lost, his included. Rather than convince the youth of their misguided ways, he is leading to allowing them to shepherd. Rather than showing the obvious differences between racism and anti-homosexuality, he has begun to cave in. He was obviously not a good choice for Archbishop. He is obviously mentally and spiritually too weak to withstand the lies coming out from the dark side, the homosexual side. He needs to repent to regain whatever strength in Jesus he had. If he can't stand up to the liars, he needs to step down and be replaced by one who can and will.

Mark my words. If the world is to be saved, there will need to be an overwhelming backlash. It will need to be by the youth of today who will come to rue the day they were duped by the siren song, the Piped Pipers, of homosex and all manner of other sexual errors. They'll rue it because many of them and their children and children's children will experience great pain and suffering that they would otherwise not have had it not been for the false propaganda of the homosexual activists.

Compassion is right. Violence is evil. Truth is real love, not homosex.

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.