Syria: Barack Obama, Dictator

  1. These people (Syria: EU urges strong response, as Kerry seeks support - want to wait for a UN report where the UN specifically was sent not to investigate who did it.
  2. That article says the Europeans claim the Syrian government was "the only party with access to such weapons." That's total nonsense. It's plain false propaganda. The rebels are supported by some of the riches people on Earth: The Saudis. Of course they, the rebels, could have been given chemical weapons and delivery systems. In addition, some rebels have reportedly admitted to an AP reporter that they had been given such weapons and that they did have an accident with them in which a number of people died. How many rebels were given such weapons? What plan were they given?
  3. Turkey caught reported al Qaeda types with sarin in Turkey, which Turkey said was suspected to be on its way to Syria. [Update: It has been reported that the sarin turned out to be anti-freeze. However, Turkey is siding with the rebels in Syria. The reason that matters is because mistaking anti-freeze for sarin even momentarily is incredibly strange. Did the sarin become anti-freeze for political reasons?]
  4. Previously, the UN had reported concerning an earlier chemical attack that the rebels appeared to be behind it, not the government – conveniently ignored by Obama.
  5. Earlier attacks, the sarin used did not have the Syrian government's stabilizers in it and the missiles used to deliver the gas were not those used by the Syrian government/military.
  6. We also have it from credible sources that when chemicals were used in Syria, the Syrian high command went to great lengths to be sure that it was not the Syrian military that had released the chemicals, that no rogue released any. The Syrian military thought that its investigations and communications on the subject were secret, but they were intercepted and blatantly twisted/misrepresented by the Zionists.
  7. We also have a Secretary of State who actually claimed to the US Senate that he can guarantee them that there is no al Qaeda in Syria. For that, President Vladimir Putin of Russia rightly called John Kerry a liar. What he politely left out was how incredibly stupid Kerry's comment was in addition to being a lie. It was a lie because it is common knowledge that the al Nusra Front is in Syria and is openly al Qaeda. They are under the al Qaeda umbrella. It's like Kerry saying Germany isn't NATO, isn't under the NATO umbrella. The al Nusra Front is in Syria and is supported in that by the top al Qaeda leadership. Al Qaeda would not denounce al Nusra for claiming to be part of the al Qaeda pact.

Regardless, how difficult would it have been for rebels to release gas at various locations under attack by the Assad forces? Not very. Nevertheless, the US Obama administration is racing the US into attacking Syria based upon evidence that is no more compelling than the joke evidence that was supplied by the George W. Bush administration in the run-up to the attack on, and invasion of, Iraq.

We know that Bush-43 deliberately lied the US into war. We know he authorized waterboarding torture. Those are both war crimes and crimes against humanity. They violate the US Constitution and the international law on the subjects to which the US has obligated itself under its Constitution as the highest law of the land.

Why are we allowing Barack Obama to rush the US into additional war crimes, a man who chose to look the other way by saying he wanted to look forward rather than back at the Bush-43 war crimes? Barack Obama causes the worst moral hazard on the face of the Earth by looking the other way. He is setting an evil precedent that Presidents will not hold former Presidents to account for war crimes, etc.

Plus, Obama himself has ordered people murdered in many places, people who should have been afforded due process of law at the very least but were not.

He has also allowed the grossly unconstitutional dragnet-surveillance of the American people, concerning which James Clapper expressly lied with impunity granted to him by Barack Obama. He's done that while falsely claiming that the secret FISA court has been good enough to assure against invasions of privacy and unreasonable searches and seizures.

Barack Obama has put the issue of attacking Syria before the US federal legislature but at the same time has not ruled out ordering an attack even if the Congress (both houses) don't agree with the attack. He has also had his side in this so-called debate make public statements that the Obama administration would illegally ignore any UN Security Council ruling against Obama on the subject.

What that constitutes is dictatorship by Barack Obama. When coupled with his non-veto of the NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act), which contains aspects that supposedly allow the President the power to arrest and indefinitely detain anyone the President merely deems an enemy without any due process whatsoever, we are clearly under a dictator the US. The Republic is dead.

Well, I'm an enemy in a very real sense. I'm non-violent but an enemy in their eyes for speaking out against them, against the dictatorship, against the lawlessness, the breaking of the US Constitution.

At this point, either the American people rise up in time in opposition or the nation will end up disintegrating into violent revolution because it is fairly clear that the military would now never exercise a military coup to remove an illegally dictatorial President the Congress refuses to impeach and remove. The military leaders are cowed. They do not put the US Constitution first. They have been handpicked to back the dictatorial-imperial presidency.

Barack Obama puts Bradley Manning in prison for 32 years for exposing the war crimes of the US in Iraq. He goes after Edward Snowden for leaking proof that James Clapper lied about the unlawful/unconstitutional spying on the American people, which spying even the US Supreme Court is not legally allowed to okay as constitutional.

The rights of the people are reserved to the people. Those rights include removing evil dictators. That's the natural law.

I don't want violence. I'm not advocating violence. I'm opposing violence.

I want the evil dictators removed once and for all. Down with the sociopaths. Down with the unrepentant Barack Obama and all of the members of his administration.

Tom Usher

Tom Usher


  1. Attacking Syria Without UN Authorization Would Be a War Crime Under International Law
  2. Obama's Planned Attack on Syria is Losing Ground Quickly
  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.