Men sodomizing each other have to take artificial steps to reduce disease symptoms that arise with sodomy. The structure/form and function of the anus/rectum are designed for the elimination of waste: feces. Using the rectum as if it is a vagina rips the tissues, which are also not nearly as elastic as vaginal tissue: won't return to normal size. The vagina, when it is functioning normally, produces natural lubrication. When coupled with the tissue's design, the vagina suffers no symptoms with typical sexual intercourse if practiced daily well into old age. Men must use artificial means, such as introducing foreign lubricants, in their attempt to reduce problems that arise with the activity.I've had it said to me that people wear glasses, which corrects for less than perfect vision and that, that is analogous with homosexuals using rectal lubricants. Drawing that analogy shows a lack of fundamental understanding, confusion.
As the vagina is obviously meant for sexual intercourse and the birth canal, the eyes are obviously meant for seeing; whereas, the rectum is meant for defecating and not sexual intercourse.
When the vagina doesn't naturally lubricate, supplying an externally produced lubricant is for the purpose of allowing the vagina to serve its intended purpose without the female suffering. When the eyes age or are less than optimal for whatever reason, the introduction of glasses is for the purpose of allowing the eyes to better serve their intended purpose. When external lubricants are introduced to the rectum by homosexuals for sexual intercourse, it is not to allow the rectum to serve its intended purpose but another purpose where regardless of the lubricant, it may still not be safely used (is not harmless) as if it were a vagina.
Using the rectum as a vagina is inherently subnormal in structure and function. It is a perversion of normal, intended purpose. It is both the result and cause of disturbance of the natural order. It is a mental disorder, which needs restoration to the pre-disorder state.
Many people have engaged in sodomy and don't want to think they've erred in doing so. They are allowing the stimulation of the sexual pleasure zones in their brains to override intelligence. To learn from errors rather than continuing to repeat them is intelligent. To continue repeating errors, especially after having been clearly informed of the errors, is unintelligent.
Physical and mental conditioning can make it difficult to overcome bad habits even in the face of knowing they're bad. The sexual pleasure zones are conditioned by dopamine, a neurotransmitter. Just as Pavlov's dogs salivated at the ringing of the bell even though food was not presented to them (the dogs brains had been conditioned to salivate by way of ringing the bell each time they were fed), homosexuals are conditioned to sexual attraction/arousal. How could the dogs shut off drooling simply by being told that no food would be forthcoming? How may those who practice anal intercourse shut off arousal by being told that it is disordered and why? Typically, does the shut off happen instantly, or does it take time to rewrite the programming? Typically, it requires patience, desire, and understanding.
Does slipping back into harmful and risky habits mean those habits are acceptable and should not only be tolerated but condoned and celebrated? The answer is self-evidently no. It is misguided and misleads.
Does showing that sodomy is an error prove that homosexuality is also an error? The basic evidence applies to both. Some things are less glaringly symptomatic to those of lesser intelligence. Stepping back from anal intercourse while still practicing male-on-male sex still leaves misdirection in terms of naturally intended structure and function.
Does evolution supply all the answers as to what is normal versus not and correct versus error? It depends upon one's definition of evolution (Darwinian or otherwise), but the answer is that eventually it does. It is not without conscious choices, meaning that intelligence exercised/applied is part of the evolutionary process and impacts upon the outcome.
The homosexual mind/approach is not conducive to even marginal sustainability let alone optimal health. It should not be celebrated but corrected. The reasons it results should be corrected. Prevention cures.