Exclusive Interview, Imprisoned Saudi Princesses, Despot Father

If the following video is correct, their father, the King of Saudi Arabia, hates some of his daughters and is being absolutely monstrous towards them. It's time for Arabia to be free of such a tyrannical and absolute monarchy.

... the daughters of the king of Saudi Arabia speak out about being locked away for years.

It's such a shame. They seem like intelligent, lovely, and sincere young women. Of course, we can't judge everything from one video, but they certainly shouldn't be their father's prisoners.

In the meantime, Barack Obama meets with their father, all smiles (selling high-tech weaponry by the tens of billions to the tyrant), and at the same time, criticizes Vladimir Putin for standing up against a US/NATO-neocon-funded violent revolution and as if Russia militarily invaded Crimea against the desires of the vast majority of Crimeans and as if Russia wasn't already there.

Also, let's not forget that this King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia is funding the military dictatorship of Egypt and also al-Qaeda types fighting in Syria. He's funding el-Sisi (the military dictator of Egypt) because Abdullah feared the Muslim Brotherhood's republican form of government. The Brotherhood doesn't want kings heading up Islamic countries. He's funding al Qaeda types but only where those fight against even greater enemies of his. President Assad of Syria is in league with the Shiites, whom the Sunni Abdullah hates even more than he does the republican Brotherhood. The top Shiite country is Iran, which also doesn't want kings but is rather currently headed by a religious leader.

This Abdullah will do anything to retain his and his tribe's absolute dictatorship over Saudi Arabia. Abdullah is even working closely with the Zionists because Hamas in Gaza/Palestine is related to the Brotherhood (and is backed by Assad and the Iranians, who aren't even Arabs but Persians). He'll work against his fellow Arabs and with Zionists and US and UK neocons, who all loathe his Arab guts (yes, they are racists/ethnic bigots), just so he may cling to despotic power.

Now he'll even try squeezing more oil from under the land to drop the global price to punish Russia for backing Assad against Islamic sharia-fundamentalists who have no qualms about beheading people left and right who simply don't want to be under extremely harsh, sharia-fundamentalist, absolute dictatorship.

Should the US be fighting the Russians, or should it work to team up with them and to get straight.

Truth: The world is mostly being run by greedy idiots, and their strategically placed and well-paid minions in media cover for them.

Tom1

Tom Usher

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.