What is this, Communist China? Don Jones, the Benham brothers, Brendan Eich, Phil Robertson, Dan Cathy, ...

"What is this, Communist China?" comes from this excellent post: The Irony of the New Tolerance.


Tom Usher

It's exactly what I pointed out in my post, McCarthyism's Gone Queer, and Christians Are the New "Reds", back on May 9, 2014. I'm pleased so many people are picking up on this truth:

National Review's Ponnuru: End 'Witch Hunts' on Gay Marriage Foes. Tuesday, 13 May 2014

This time, it's liberals who are doing the blacklisting: 'Gay mafia' is working to silence opposing voices in the name of diversity, by Kevin Leininger of The News-Sentinel. Thursday, May 15, 2014

Leftist Thought Police emboldened and on a tear, by David Limbaugh. 5/13/2014

I disagree with the theology concerning hate in that last link.

Perhaps the most misunderstood words of Jesus: If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple. (Luke 14:26 KJV)

Some, many, theologians attempt to explain the hate there as simply meaning by comparison to how much we are to love God. Actually, it is not simply that, although that's part of it. We are to understand the words in light of these words also:

Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. (Matthew 7:17-20 KJV)

We must reconcile that while we are to love those who hate us, we are to also understand that we are what we do. If we do what is hated by God, we are in that sense hated by God. It's why the Westboro Baptists have their signs reading that "God Hates Fags." This in no way removes the healing and forgiving power of God. We are being tested, all of us. Those who overcome, will inherit life, the life Jesus spoke of and went to, where he is right now.

We don't agree with the tactics of the Westboro church, but we cannot simply dismiss their statement as being impossible. It is not impossible. It represents a paradox that is able to be reconciled by the few:

Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. (Matthew 7:14 KJV)

Don't expect to understand this at the drop of a hat. Don't condemn what you don't understand just because you've had some views, or heard or read some other teachings, that don't appear to you to jibe at all with what I'm saying here. Suspend your judgment, and seek the truth. I had to. I'm glad I did.

If you haven't seen this, Robert Gagnon: The Bible & Homosexual Practice - The Witness of Jesus on Vimeo, I recommend you watch it and read my post on it.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.