The title of my post is ridiculous on purpose, of course. However, if you've been at all following Pope Francis' "career" as Pope, you know where the title is coming from.
When it came to the issue of homosexuality, Francis said, "Who am I to judge."
When it came to the issue of atheism, Frances clearly suggested that atheist can enter Heaven.
Now when it comes to stopping ISIS (and other such groups: Boko Haram, etc.), it's okay: Pope backs military force to protect Iraq minorities.
He didn't say go kill[?] ISIS, but he might as well have said it. How else could the world stop such a violently coercive and utterly wicked, Satanic group as ISIS without resorting to violence?
Well, as Christians, we're supposed to pray and not curse. Where is Pope Francis' faith?
I understand his concern. He's no more concerned than am I about the insane Wahhabists hellbent upon establishing their twisted version of Islam, as if the version Mohammed had in mind isn't confused enough.
Let me say very clearly that were I militaristic, I would advocate completely immediately wiping out all of them and all those who hold similar, belligerent positions. Any group that issues the ultimatums to people that ISIS has is certainly a scourge. They should stop, turn, and repent of their evil ways or burn. "Turn or burn" is the expression. The burn part is figurative but represents the negative consequences for such extreme wickedness that ISIS and Boko Haram exhibit.
However, I'm not militaristic. I believe Jesus Christ taught pacifism for a very clear reason that is absolutely correct. Violence hardens hearts. It makes itself acceptable. It weakens the internal, moral defenses against it. It begets itself no matter how hard those who engage in it attempt to use it selectively. They slip up and kill the innocent with the guilty. That is never acceptable.
Jesus said the following:
The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field: But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way. But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also. So the servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? from whence then hath it tares? He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up? But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them. Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn. (Matthew 13:24-30 KJV)
Pope Francis is speaking very dangerous words because of what he is not saying (if he has been correctly characterized in the linked article). He is not emphatically saying to the worldly powers, don't use violence.
To those who will argue but what about the innocents being murdered by ISIS and Boko Haram, I say your argument is against Jesus. Do you think you know better than Jesus about which is the right path for humanity to righteousness? I have searched and searched and searched for better than Jesus' teachings and have found none.
We have seen the drones killing the innocent. Is your heart so hardened that it is acceptable to you that those innocent ones died so some guilty ones (questionable whether they were more wrong than those who sent the drones) could be killed so you and yours wouldn't have to face them (at least that's the reason given by the US government for killing them)?
Francis is wrong about homosexuality, atheism, and now this: "stopping them"; militarism. Francis took the right name, spoke well about the poor, and walked among the people, but that's not good enough.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)