What's Really Behind the New US/EU Sanctions Against Russia?

Europe Russia Gas...draconian measures were imposed on the Russian energy industry, where the US and Europe are attempting to shut down important new exploration projects in Siberia and the Arctic by barring foreign oil companies from providing any equipment, technology or assistance to deepwater, offshore, or shale projects.

The bans will prevent previously active companies such as Exxon and Shell from dealing with five of the largest Russian oil producers and pipeline operators: Gazprom, Gazprom Neft, LukOil, Surgutneftegas, and Rosneft.

Source: Sweeping new US and EU sanctions target Russia's banks and oil companies | World news | The Guardian.

The Obama administration, with its neoconservative/imperialist base, has been attempting to get the naive, gullible minions and sycophants of America to falsely believe that Vladimir Putin has a plan to restore Stalinist Russia. The truth is that Vladimir Putin is not at all interested in restoring the Soviet Union. He simply wants Russia to be great and strong without lording it over any other nation-states.

The US/EU neocons, however, do want to lord it over other nation-states: all other nation-states. They don't want to make the world safe for democracy. They want to make the world safe for elitist multi-billionaires of their own persuasion.

To accomplish that, they want to make sure that Russia's energy sector is crippled internationally to cut off Russia's income to weaken it so the US/EU elitists, especially US, may swoop in and establish themselves as the new Russian plutocrats by controlling interests in the corporations that will own the state. After that, it will be on to China.

Their aim is global dictatorship of, by, and for the plutocrats. It is not democracy!

Further to accomplish that dictatorship, they use a nonstop barrage of lies about other nations. They lied endlessly about Iraq (WMD and 9/11). They lied about Libya (that there would be a moderate government controlling the whole of it). They lied about Iran (nuclear-weapons program; finally had to back off that, though not enough, and due to alternative-media pressure). They lied about Syria (chemical-weapons use and that moderates are plentiful enough and strong enough to come to control the nation after Assad). They lied about many other nations, but now they've decided to lie about Russia because Putin stood in the way concerning Syria and then Ukraine, just as Russia had stood in the way in Georgian oppression of ethnic Russians in South Ossetia, etc.

Putin also aided Edward Snowden; and he hasn't caved into American political correctness of "social liberalism," which is just code for the slippery slope to total sexual anarchy despite the claims to the contrary by tens of millions of duped "liberals" who falsely imagine that those behind the "sexual liberation" have some moral lines across which they do not intend to drag the whole of society.

Remember that in Russia's war in Afghanistan, the US armed and trained and funded what became al Qaeda that has morphed into ISIS and the "Islamic State" that issues an ultimatum to all the other people of the entire world: convert to Takfiri Islam or pay the jizya tax or leave or be killed. Of course, it's un-Islamic, as failure to pay the jizya is not to subject the party to a death penalty but rather simply no protection by the Islamic state against legal acts against the party failing to pay. In the US, we call it a protection racket; but ISIS has taken that to a whole new level. They don't break your windows and then ask for the protection money again. They move directly to cutting off your head. Of course, they keep (steal) all your land and property and so forth.

Also remember, the US pledged to the Soviet Union that it would not expand NATO. The US lied about that. The Soviet Union opened up on trust and the Russian people were rewarded with outright betrayal and economic devastation and misery that Putin came in and reversed. He shut down the neoliberals.

Now the Obama administration is endlessly lying about Russian actions vis-a-vis Ukraine. Russia did not invade Ukraine. Also, the US has been backing admitted fascists in Ukraine.

No matter what Vladimir Putin does from now on, no matter how generous and peaceful, etc., and no matter how much secularly strategically wiser it would be for the sake of democracy for Obama to reverse course and to ally with Russia and to moderate Assad and Iran and others to also ally with the US against the Takfiris, the US political leadership has decided to ignore Putin while working to cripple Russia and eventually all those who ally themselves with Russia against US dictates and its larger goal of absolute global domination: dictatorship the absolute envy of the spirit of all historical absolute monarchs.

Here's what will happen. Russia will work to develop on its own all the technology it needs. Russian scientists and engineers are quite capable. Their rocketry proves that. The problem will be with money and trade, especially trade.

Europe is making a huge error siding with US neocons on this.

US neocons are warmongering again toward Russia. They are only in the preliminary phases of that. They have to be careful because Russia is nuclear and very able to keep secret their weapons developments.

What won't happen again is Russia falling down the way the Soviet Union collapsed. The Russian people have learned that lesson only too well.

In addition, China can surely see the writing on the wall that they are, in fact, the main target (have been for decades now).

No nation is safe that doesn't knuckle under to the US plutocracy.

The only way out is for the rest of the world simultaneously to stop agreeing to go along with whatever the US demands. Some nations try to refuse, but they are eventually picked off one by one. The US from the outside and even to some on the inside, looks impatient, but it is not. It has worked for decades to undermine other nations before removing the final supports. It will go in and pull back only to go in again and again and again until the job is done.

The aim of the US plutocracy is global Empire under them and only them. They will allow super-rich people of other nations but only if those super-rich agree with and fully cooperate with the US plutocrats.

It is wickedness. It is manifest evil: radical evil in the flesh. It is doomed to failure, but don't be a part of it. Don't facilitate it. Speak and act against it. Retain the moral high ground. Do not stoop to their level. Do not be duped.

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.