What Obama Should Do: "Iraq Turns on US, Wants Russia Iran as Battle Partners"

11041501...we have Sunni militants terrorizing both Syria and Iraq and instead of working with the Iranians to oust those extremists, Washington is busy downplaying their successes and supporting the proxy armies of Saudi Arabia and Qatar even as those proxy armies behead Westerners and burn Jordanian pilots alive.

This is a travesty and an absolute farce.

The US is on the wrong side of history here and it's too late to correct it.

Source: Iraq Turns on US, Wants Russia Iran as Battle Partners

Well, it most certainly isn't too late to correct.

Barack Obama pivoted when he struck a chemical-weapons deal concerning Syria. He pivoted when he struck a nuclear deal concerning Iran. Now he simply needs to pivot and strike a deal with Putin concerning the entire planet.

Russia is not, repeat, is not the enemy of the United States. There is no good reason whatsoever that the US and Russia shouldn't be the closest of allies, including with Crimea being part of Russia and including with the people of Donbas being reasonably autonomous from Kiev.

Russia could have been America's close ally long ago, but George H.W. Bush was too slow to grasp the golden opportunity that was placed in his lap.

The Russian people make their President Putin very popular in Russia. That's their democratic choice. Contrary to claims against him, President Putin will (again) adhere to term limits, per the Russian constitution.

What President Barack Obama must do is more of what he has already done: turn a deaf ear to the neocons, which has been the smartest thing he's ever done.

There are plenty of further refinements he should make, especially concerning Turkey's utterly stupid and evil approach toward the YPG (Kurds); but if he will realign with Russia and then put his foot down against the political Zionists in Israel concerning a final resolution of the Palestinian crisis to bring it to a close with the Palestinians having full nation-state status recognized by the US and Russia, etc., he would go down in history as perhaps the President who learned the most in office about foreign policy, grew accordingly, took huge decisions (likewise accordingly), and prevailed.

I realize that none of this is "Christian," per se; but it doesn't mean that I don't simultaneously call upon all the nations of the world to turn to peace. I do make that call, but they are afraid.

See also: Netanyahu Need Not Fear a Thing From Obama, Obama Tells Netanyahu


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.