Fake News Against Putin and Russia is Being Used to Get Trump

Linda Milazzo unfriended me on Facebook. Linda is part of the problem. She doesn't care when fake news against Putin and Russia is being used by those out to get Trump. She made that perfectly clear. She said that ordinarily, she'd agree with me that using fake news, fake intel, and disinfo, etc., is wrong but that she hates Trump soooooo much that in this case, she's fine with it.


Tom Usher

So, in taking down Trump (attempting to) via such means, she doesn't understand that she (and her cohorts) will be leaving the neocons standing in power, who will do anything to complete their global-revolution agenda to seize absolute control over the whole of humanity for the ultimate sake of their "Zionism" (and to Hell with anyone who won't bow down and worship the Chosen People: totally Old Testament, Talmudic distorted; New Testament fully ignored).

It's pure racism on the part of a large number of extremely wealthy and power-hungry Jews who consider themselves a race apart, not simply an ethnic group but a different race, even species (spiritually superior in every way).

If you call them out for it, they simply reflect back at you, calling you anti-Semitic, as if you have been referring to all Jews as opposed to only those Jews who are clearly racists and who see you as inherently inferior for not being a blood member (maternal line) of one of their Tribes.

Then people turn around and say that religion has nothing to do with anything that's going on but that it's all "political," as if the two are separate things because of the concept of secularism.

Most "liberals" are continually distancing themselves from Jesus because they think scientism is the path to knowledge and truth. When they do that, they increasingly throw out Jesus's message concerning exactly what I'm talking about right here to you. They end up hating Christianity in all forms. They use fake stories more and more against everything that stands in the way of the coming wrath without even knowing what they're doing.

Then there are the worst of the worst, the "Christian Zionists," who convince each other that hastening the wrath is something Jesus is glad they're doing.

This is what wormwood in the New Testament is about: huge bitterness unleashing the horrendous wrath of world war.

The Old Testament prophet Jesus points to the most is Isaiah. "For it is the day of the LORD'S vengeance, and the year of recompences for the controversy of Zion." (Isa 34:8)

The LORD's vengeance is human bitterness and wrath against fellow humans. Jesus warned them about it. They, however, read in isolation, ignoring that the "controversy of Zion" cuts both ways: that there is Zion (the fake) and then there is Zion (the real); that the Jews have fallen on both sides, lightness and darkness. It's as if Jeremiah never denounced the Jews (the tribes) and never correctly predicted the Jew's huge losses for having turned to the darkside.

Nowhere does Jesus teach that we are to resort to wrath or to encourage it. He warned against engaging in it but also that it will happen despite our best efforts to try to convince others not to go down that path. We are to see it for what it is and to understand who is doing it and why they think they are doing it and why they think they are right (but, nevertheless, ultimately wrong).

People with Linda's current mindset aren't patient enough to even listen let alone hear and understand.

"Make the heart of this people fat, and make their ears heavy, and shut their eyes; lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and convert, and be healed." (Isa 6:10)

"For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them." (Mat 13:15) That's Jesus harkening back to Isaiah.

What did Linda hate? She hated that I posted Daniel Lazare's article, "Democrats, Liberals Catch McCarthyistic Fever," which is on Consortiumnews.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 – present, website developer and writer. 2015 – present, insurance broker.

    Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration.

    Volunteerism: 2007 – present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.

    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.