I love Jonathan Cook's article/analysis on the "New Anti-Semitism" witch hunt of the Labour Party and Jeremy Corbyn save for one thing

Echoing the post's title: I love Jonathan Cook's article/analysis on the "New Anti-Semitism" witch hunt of the Labour Party and Jeremy Corbyn save for one thing.

Corbyn is the first British party leader in sight of power to prefer the Palestinians’ right to justice over Israel’s continuing oppression of the Palestinians.

For these reasons, the Blairite MPs have been trying to oust Corbyn any way they can. First through a failed re-run of the leadership contest and then by assisting the corporate media – which is equally opposed to Corbyn – in smearing him variously as a shambles, a misogynist, a sympathiser with terrorists, a Russian asset, and finally as an “enabler” of anti-semitism.

This last accusation has proved the most fruitful after the Israel lobby began to expand the definition of anti-semitism to include not just hatred of Jews but also criticism of Israel. Labour was eventually forced to accept a redefinition, formulated by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, that conflates anti-Zionism – opposition to Israel’s violent creation on the Palestinians’ homeland – with anti-semitism. [Source]

There's one extremely serious error in that block quote: "Labour was eventually forced." No, no it wasn't. Labour eventually caved into the liars' demands.

Here's what Labour must do (not needs to do, but MUST) in order to win the day. It must roll back every last thing it did to appease the fascist, racist Zionists. Anything Labour did to root out true anti-Jewishness should, of course, remain; but, everyone who should never have been abandoned by Labour should be fully restored, and Labour should never again cave! Labour must repeal the "New Anti-Semitism" definition of anti-Semitism. Anti-Semitism is not, repeat, NOT anti-Zionism. Being a Jew and being a Zionist are two distinct things.

What the Hell? Does Jeremy Corbyn believe that being anti-Tory is being anti Anglo-Saxon? Does he even believe for a second that England should be solely ruled by Anglo-Saxons? Honestly. England is an English state. That's what "Israel is a Jewish state" means. England should have Anglo-Saxon roads only. The Anglo-Saxons should do everything to non-Anglo-Saxons that the Zionists are doing to non-Jews. Is that what he's defending or condoning or even tolerating because he's too chicken to fight for what's right?

Imagine an Anglo-Saxon state of England. What would all the whining Jews there do then, complain that England was being like the Jewish state of Israel?

God damn it! Get a backbone. Call the liars what they are: LIARS! Say it to they're faces. Say it over and over and over. Put them on the defensive. Make them defend they're utterly monstrous policies and practices supporting the thoroughly wicked Netanyahu government and all those to Netanyahu's right (hard to believe there are people who are even worse than he is, but there you have it).

Tom Usher

About Tom Usher

Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.