by...
SEAN HANNITY AND RUSH LIMBAUGH WILLFUL, SINFUL TWISTING THE BUSH RECESSION/DEPRESSION BLAMING BARACK OBAMA
Are other so-called neoconservatives embarrassed by Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh? Who is publicly distancing himself from these two? Where's the repudiation of their lies?
Hannity and Limbaugh are calling the current economic crash (caused by wild monetary policies and equally wild real estate speculation and exotic, toxic derivatives) Barack Obama's fault. ("Hannity, Limbaugh promote myth of an 'Obama recession'," Media Matters. November 12, 2008.)
They are suggesting that the majority of the reason (not really saying it that I know of — maybe they are — but clearly implying it by virtue of the weight they are placing on it, calling this the Obama recession) investors are not jumping back into equities is because of Obama's risky signals.
Now that's just total hogwash. Of course people are wondering exactly what an Obama administration will look like, but that concern isn't amounting to a hill of beans in terms of investing in Wall Street right now compared with people not knowing how much total junk there is in the system put there by deregulated, under-regulated, and unregulated markets by laissez-faire- and crony-capitalist-investment creators.
Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh are just grasping at whatever they can, and by trying to label the recession the "Obama Recession" when it is without doubt George W. Bush's Crash of 2008, they are trying the Big Lie tactic of Adolf Hitler and the other Machiavellians.
What is so annoying about these two is that the vast majority of their viewers and listeners know that this is exactly what's going on too. These people wink at each other over the radio for crying out loud. It's amazing the level of dishonesty. It isn't even remotely clever. They don't even care how transparent they are.
Barack Obama did not cause this recession. His announced policies are not sending fear through the investment community. If the people had elected Herbert Hoover again (Heaven help us) or any other president or person, the markets would still be dead for a good while.
Don't these people read their own economists? Anna Schwartz co-authored, "A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960" with Milton Friedman. She has stated that the toxic securities are keeping people out of the markets. They don't know what value there is behind the huge corporations on account of the junk securities. Investors are waiting to see the dust settle so they can look around at the damage to appraise the situation. Don't blame it on Obama. He's going to make enough real mistakes without people having to bear false witness about him based upon ridiculously contrived propaganda.
Look, anyone who reads this blog knows full well that I'm no fan of Barack Obama, but it's just pathetic to see Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh spewing such utter garbage. Why are these guys on the air? Who can look in the mirror and listen to those two and agree with them? Don't people know that their kind of talk is sinful? It's deliberate malicious lying and gossip. That's evil. They have zero excuses for it. Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh don't believe the stuff they are spewing out. They are being paid to spew lies.
Honest errors are one thing, but this level of constant fabrication is beyond the pale. All the corruption of the Bush administration hasn't humbled these two a bit. How will they escape damnation if they don't stop and thoroughly repent and there still be any justice?
- Technorati Tags: Adolf Hitler, Anna Schwartz, Barack Obama, Big Lie, capitalist, clever, contrived, corporations, Crash of 2008, crony, culture, current affairs, current events, damnation, deregulated, dishonesty, distancing, economic crash, economists, embarrassed, equities, evil, George W. Bush, Hannity, Heaven, Herbert Hoover, humbled, investors, junk securities, justice, laissez-faire, Limbaugh, Machiavellians, malicious gossip, malicious lies, markets, media, Milton Friedman, monetary policies, neoconservatives, news, Obama administration, Obama recession, philosophy, politics, propaganda, real estate speculation, recession, repent, repudiation, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, sinful, society, spirituality, technology, theology, Tom Usher, toxic derivatives, toxic securities, transparent, under-regulated, unregulated, Wall Street, wink
Tom Usher
Standing Comment, all posts and pages:
To all homosexuals and their supporters, condoners, promoters, accepters, confirmers, and the like:
Unless you have something completely new that hasn't already been refuted, don't bother. It won't show up.
Rehashing what has already been refuted is a waste of everyone's time.
I'm not interested in casting pearls before swine, giving the children's bread to the dogs, or rebuking a forever scorner.
Learn or go away: There is zero wisdom in homosexuality. Homosexuality is wrong. Nothing any homosexual or anyone else can say or do will alter it. No one needs the Bible to know it either. It's prima facie. There's no such thing as an unrepentant-homosexual Christian. There never has been and never will be. That's the way of it. If you don't like it, change.
Do site searches on the various topics concerning homosexuality to determine if your "point" has already been handled. Currently, I provide three different search methods. The "WordPress" search is still the most thorough.
The same can be done regarding militarism, capitalism, coercion, and many other main issues and themes.
TREATMENT, RUDENESS, POLITENESS, OFFENSE, TRUTH
Many times over the course of this website's existence, I've had commentators complain about how I've treated them and/or others. Much less frequently has anyone taken exception to those commentator's comments. I assume that's because for one, I appear to be holding my own.
Often, I have raised the fact that Jesus called certain people "serpents." I've often also mentioned how he cleaned the temple with whip in hand, not that he used it on anyone. It certainly doesn't say that he did, and neither was he charged with it in the kangaroo court of the serpents who ended up murdering him by proxy just for, among other wonderful things, speaking out and speaking truth.
If I say that those who are engaged in serpentine behavior are the New Testament "serpents," then why take offense at my saying it rather than standing with Jesus and me about it?
If others don't like it that I treat others or them the way I have in this regard, why don't they take it up with the serpents and/or their own consciences and God?
If I wanted to catch flies, I'd use honey. I don't want flies on this level. Human beings aren't to be on the level of flies. If the truth is bitter as vinegar, then ask yourself why and learn to taste it as sweet but not sickeningly so. Why attack the message and messenger, as the serpents did, and become a serpent by so doing?
The issue is not "name calling" on some bratty, childish level. When Jesus said "serpents," he was not being as a brat. His level was completely adult to adults and children. He dared say that the children understood the clear and plain truth before the adults who, afterall, had been abused and socialized by the serpents. He still calls adults back. Those who hear him and know his voice (truth) turn around and do the other required things together as well.
What is it for a human being to be more serpentine or reptilian than what God initially gave? What was and remains Jesus's point? What is the reptilian brain versus the vastly higher human brain with its cerebral cortex and frontal and temporal lobes and specific areas of altruistic sentiments and abilities? What are those higher areas before they are damaged, before the communication pathways to them and between them are diminished by evil that is always some form of abuse? How are those pathways reestablished or created where they never were in this fleshly life?
The snake lays its eggs. The eggs hatch. The snake parent doesn't nurture or raise the offspring. It's every snake for itself. Human parents and family are not designed to be that way. Humans hand down the learning of nurturing. Many people get better training than do others, and many people have a greater aptitude for learning and predisposition for the higher and highest virtues. Many are less abused. People can change for the better and best though, no matter where the starting point. They only can't if they don't — if they reject it.
Snakes, of course, also come in venomous varieties and in strangling varieties, etc., such that they have been attackers and even devourers of humans for eons, guilty and innocent alike.
Now, Jesus knew that most people could relate to what were, and still are, largely considered "good" parenting skills and "good" "family" relations. He regularly used those concepts to get people to consider the wider implications for the whole of humanity. He did know that many would refuse. He let them go. He didn't demand secular or false-religion legislation to rein them in with threats of violence and imprisonment. He was not and is not coercive. Even his Church is a voluntary place to be.
What he still teaches (through the written words in the New Testament and as those connect with the Old and also teaches through the Holy Spirit he definitely sent as he said he would) is, among many other things, that "good" is vastly better than has been commonly accepted and that real "family" is everyone left after all the rest have rejected the higher and highest good. He raised the standards far above the Old Testament and far above the "modern" standard.
The American Empire and the American people in general aren't even touching the hem of his garment, let alone even attempting to stand upright and side-by-side with him.
I point out that Jesus was, and is, a Real Liberal Christian. He is the one who brought back this censored truth that is the light. After he had spoken it and lived it and was murdered for doing so, the censors set about to re-censor it and did. They couldn't put it out though — couldn't completely extinguish the truth. I wouldn't be saying it now again with all credit to God, just as Jesus, if they had been able to completely block it.
I point out that each of those terms ("real," "liberal," and "Christian," along with "Church") are actually redundant terms — synonyms that are so close that they become one. The term "liberal" here is not the common usage, which common usage is a deliberate corruption of the term. There is no harm in real liberalism. There is no vileness in it. There is only beneficence. "Real" may be understood as the opposite of false-hearted, dark side, and dead of the Holy Spirit. Christian is both real and liberal in those senses. To arrive at living, doing, being those full senses requires what Jesus lives, does, and is in the highest. Finally, the Church is the whole.
Who are they who want to drag it down, censor it, work against it, lessen it, ignore it, etc.? Well, who sides with Jesus and who sides against him? Did the serpents side with him then? Do they now?
We call war-mongers "hawks." We call "peacemakers" blessed and "doves." Why do the hawks not take offense at "hawks" but do take offense at "serpents"? "Hawks" is not yet as telling to the general public, but I must tell you that all hawks are serpents. Why do some say, "Greed is good" but take offense at "serpents"? I tell you there is no difference between the selfish and the serpents. Why do people take offense at serpents when they do not take offense at homosexuality? I tell you the homosexual spirit also comes out from the dark side. It is a choice. It is harmful. Many are abused with it. Many never overcome it. Their very brain matter is transformed by it. Then they claim it is good when it remains confusion and definitely wrong and harmful.
Many arguments were put forth in support of tolerance. I understood that Jesus "tolerated," as in he did not execute wrath but rather told the truth and let the blind follow the blind (blind to the truth) into the ditch of their own making. I have watched while the movement has been corrupted into condoning what was once only to be tolerated. I have watched further while it has moved from condoning to promoting even to the youngest children to get to them before the truth does. I have seen evil at work, and I sound the alarm. I face censorship and other negative reactions for it.
As the American Empire claims to be a light to the world, it murders innocent babies by Hellfire missiles fired from predator drones controlled by armchair, video-gaming serpents in uniform. It tortures those who are not even suspects. It spies on its own without even probable cause or reasonable suspicion. It lies its way into wars for spoils and control. It neglects its poor, whom it treads down for the sakes of the superrich — for the sake of the massive flow of mammon from the bottom up (no trickledown — trickledown is a farce and always has been). All is claimed to be okay in America though — that America is headed in the right direction — because soon, even "don't tell, don't ask" will be a thing of the quaint past and homosexuals may be able to sleep together and have sex in the barracks with the "blessing" of the Empire while they practice murdering the innocent for the sake of homosexual, greedy plutocrats who own them and who, in turn, are owned by the dark-side spirit named by God and Jesus as Satan.
Whose side are you on? I speak truth to warn. I don't tell the secular government what to do other than occasionally to say what at least would be less hypocritical within their fallen, unenlightened system. I do so for spiritual reasons. What I want is the Christian Commons.
Now, if you submit a comment:
What you write here against the Real Liberal Christian Church founded by Jesus Christ will mark you in the Biblical sense unless you show that you have turned and are repenting in time to escape the damnation of your own choosing. That's the way of it. Don't be tempted by the devil to stand opposed to the call of righteousness. Overcome such evil temptation. Help others to help yet others to come to righteous behavior through-and-through.
Check out how even after reading this, people will still take it out of context and twist it to an evil end.