TWITTER DAILY UPDATE FOR 2010-01-24
- @nasrocket "there are normal people making allot of money buying foreclosures right now" Why did you say that to me? What's good in it? in reply to nasrocket #
- How can the decade ending in 2009 be the warmest of the "modern" record while Christopher Monckton pronounces otherwise? Answer: He's wrong. #
- "Christopher Monckton, former science advisor to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher" Wrong! He was not her science advisor. #
- "Recent global cool-down challenges validity of climate change models" What recent cool-down? Wait until things really heat up. #
- There is a cycle from warm to cool to warm.... The trend line is still up cycle-to-cycle. Not all of it is anthropogenic but too much is. #
- http://www.timesofmalta.com/ar.....e-sce ptics "Debunking climate change sceptics" #
- http://www.seattlepi.com/conne.....oel23 .html "Global warming is real, and we should be worried," Joel Connelly. #
- China and Russia are opposed to sanctions against Iran, but Hillary Clinton sees unity on Iran. She's blatantly lying -- Zionist! #
- "Hillary Clinton said Thursday the international community is 'unified in its resolve' to put pressure on Iran." Who gave her a microphone? #
- Hillary Clinton nor any of the other lying, Zionist neocons have produced even a shred of evidence against Iran. War-mongers! Sick! #
- Prove it, Hillary. Show me one tiny bit of credible evidence that Iran wants a nuclear weapon. She's a liar. It's time for her to go. #
- http://bit.ly/6y5W9Q..... Israeli Jews defy Zionist, fascist police to protest illegal Jewish-only settlements in "Arab/Muslim" East Jerusalem. #
- Obama attacked the Supreme Court corporate-donations ruling saying it "strikes at democracy itself." Is he for a Constitutional amendment? #
- Iran will unveil 3 satellites amid Zionist lies that Tehran is using its nuclear & space industries to develop nuclear & ballistic weapons. #
- "U.S. spy agencies updating intelligence on Iran see growing evidence...Tehran has pushed forward with nuclear weapons research." Prove it! #
- Zionist liars are the unnamed "sources" for so-called U.S. intelligence reports against Iran. They think you're dumb enough to fall for it. #
- The mass, mainstream, corporate, for-profit media spews the Zionist's false-propaganda, psy-ops against the American people about Iran. #
- Angela Merkel, What is the matter with you? You have no proof against Iran. Show me the proof, or stop. The Germans need honest leaders. #
- Angela Merkel, stop sucking up to the lying Zionists who are hellbent on dragging Germany into fighting the Zionists' illegal wars for them. #
- Sheikh Abdullah al-Manie of the Council of Senior Ulema is spinning Mohammed's marriage and sexual consummation with then 9-year-old Aisha. #
- It won't work Sheikh Abdullah al-Manie, Council of Senior Ulema. It's wrong now, and it was just as wrong then. Mohammed did an evil thing. #
- http://business.maktoob.com/20.....rticl e.htm "Child marriages not justified" #
- Why do Muslims make excuses for pedophilia? Pedophilia is wrong and always has been. Forgiveness is one thing. Continued lying is another. #
- "UK brothers, aged 11 and 12, sentenced for torture" Where did they learn it, the CIA, Rupert Murdoch? They may as well have. #
- "For two decades, Chile was the "teacher’s pet" of Latin America, the student who always brought home straight A’s" with the devil grading. #
- FOX New's "Judge" Andrew Napolitano's knowledge of the history of the New Deal and the Great Depression is completely wrong. #
- When FDR listened to the Andrew Napolitanos of his day, things got worse. When he stopped and went back to the plan, things got better. #
- FDR did not bailout the banksters. Andrew Napolitano is spinning when he says Obama is doing what FDR did. Napolitano is ignorant or lying. #
- Unemployment went up, not down, when FDR started back in with the more laissez-faire crap. #
- De-regulation under Senator Phil Gramm, et al., caused the current crash. If he hadn't been listened to, the crash wouldn't have happened. #
- Laissez-faire is insane. Humans have brains & don't have to wait for "the markets." The market is just a retro-indicator of souls duped. #
- The U.S. military deployment to Haiti is a military occupation when it turns back Doctors Without Borders flights, which it did repeatedly. #
- Have any real investigative journalists eliminated CIA provocateurs' involvement in Nigerian clashes between Muslims & so-called Christians? #
- The Anglo-American-Israeli Empire controls Nigerian oil, not the Nigerian people who should. The CIA are global terrorists for plutocrats. #
- Let me mention Paul Volcker before Democrats start chanting his name. Volcker wouldn't blink balancing the budget on the backs of the poor. #
- Paul Volcker is not a Populist. Barack Obama must go outside the retreads. Volcker reined in inflation squeezing the poor for the rich. #
- Paul Volcker would be the perfect choice to break entitlements rather than doing the right thing: busting the Banksters. #
- The banksters still call the shots in the Obama administration. It's all just spin. Obama is playing the dupes again. He's playacting. #
- It's calculated. They'll want him to sound as if he's anti-bankster; but behind the scenes, the banksters are to keep control. End the Fed. #
- "Google is the supplier of...core search technology...'Intellipedia...highly-secu red...37,000 U.S. spies...related personnel share info...." #
- Google & the CIA makes one wonder about Google and China and the recent stock sale plan by Google's two founders, Larry Page & Sergey Brin. #
- Google claims it's interested in the Chinese people's freedom of inquiry. #
- Google is also complaining about China possibly spying on dissidents who are using Google from China. #
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I.....telli pedia & Google & intelligence http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/.....LUAP8 L.DTL #
- How can one "Do no Evil" but supply for profit the CIA that murders innocents & mere "suspects" via Hellfire missiles from predator drones? #
- Google speaks about it as if there is no difference between supplying the CIA versus any other organization. There's a huge difference. #
Powered by Twitter Tools
- Technorati Tags: 9-year-old Aisha, Abdullah al-Manie, advisor, Aisha, Andrew Napolitano, Angela Merkel, Anglo-American-Israeli Empire, anthropogenic global warming, Arab, bailout, balance the budget, banksters, Barack Obama, Central Intelligence Agency, child marriages, Chile, China, Chinese people, Christians, Christopher Monckton, CIA, climate change, climate-change sceptics, corporate donations, Council of Senior Ulema, deregulation, dissidents, Do no Evil, Doctors Without Borders, East Jerusalem, End the Fed, entitlements, false-propaganda, fascist, FDR, Federal Reserve System, for-profit media, FOX News, freedom of inquiry, Germans, Germany, global warming, Google, Google Inc., Great Depression, Haiti, Hellfire missiles, Hillary Clinton, illegal settlements, illegal wars, Illinois, inflation, Intellipedia, Iran, Israeli Jews, Ivy League, Jerusalem, Jewish-only, Joel Connelly, laissez-faire, Larry Page, Latin America, mainstream media, Margaret Thatcher, military occupation, Mohammed, Muslim, Muslims, neocons, New Deal, Nigerian, Nigerian oil, nuclear weapons, Obama administration, oil, Paul Volcker, pedophilia, Phil Gramm, plutocrats, Politics, Populist, predator drones, Presidency of Barack Obama, Prime Minister, provocateurs, psy-ops, Rupert Murdoch, Russia, sanctions, science advisor, search technology, Senator, Sergey Brin, sexual consummation, Sheikh Abdullah al-Manie, spy, spying, Supreme Court, Tehran, terrorists, torture, Tweets, Twitter, Twitter Inc, U.S. intelligence, U.S. military, U.S. spies, unemployment, United Kingdom, United States, war-mongers, Zionism, Zionist
Tom Usher
Standing Comment, all posts and pages:
To all homosexuals and their supporters, condoners, promoters, accepters, confirmers, and the like:
Unless you have something completely new that hasn't already been refuted, don't bother. It won't show up.
Rehashing what has already been refuted is a waste of everyone's time.
I'm not interested in casting pearls before swine, giving the children's bread to the dogs, or rebuking a forever scorner.
Learn or go away: There is zero wisdom in homosexuality. Homosexuality is wrong. Nothing any homosexual or anyone else can say or do will alter it. No one needs the Bible to know it either. It's prima facie. There's no such thing as an unrepentant-homosexual Christian. There never has been and never will be. That's the way of it. If you don't like it, change.
Do site searches on the various topics concerning homosexuality to determine if your "point" has already been handled. Currently, I provide three different search methods. The "WordPress" search is still the most thorough.
The same can be done regarding militarism, capitalism, coercion, and many other main issues and themes.
TREATMENT, RUDENESS, POLITENESS, OFFENSE, TRUTH
Many times over the course of this website's existence, I've had commentators complain about how I've treated them and/or others. Much less frequently has anyone taken exception to those commentator's comments. I assume that's because for one, I appear to be holding my own.
Often, I have raised the fact that Jesus called certain people "serpents." I've often also mentioned how he cleaned the temple with whip in hand, not that he used it on anyone. It certainly doesn't say that he did, and neither was he charged with it in the kangaroo court of the serpents who ended up murdering him by proxy just for, among other wonderful things, speaking out and speaking truth.
If I say that those who are engaged in serpentine behavior are the New Testament "serpents," then why take offense at my saying it rather than standing with Jesus and me about it?
If others don't like it that I treat others or them the way I have in this regard, why don't they take it up with the serpents and/or their own consciences and God?
If I wanted to catch flies, I'd use honey. I don't want flies on this level. Human beings aren't to be on the level of flies. If the truth is bitter as vinegar, then ask yourself why and learn to taste it as sweet but not sickeningly so. Why attack the message and messenger, as the serpents did, and become a serpent by so doing?
The issue is not "name calling" on some bratty, childish level. When Jesus said "serpents," he was not being as a brat. His level was completely adult to adults and children. He dared say that the children understood the clear and plain truth before the adults who, afterall, had been abused and socialized by the serpents. He still calls adults back. Those who hear him and know his voice (truth) turn around and do the other required things together as well.
What is it for a human being to be more serpentine or reptilian than what God initially gave? What was and remains Jesus's point? What is the reptilian brain versus the vastly higher human brain with its cerebral cortex and frontal and temporal lobes and specific areas of altruistic sentiments and abilities? What are those higher areas before they are damaged, before the communication pathways to them and between them are diminished by evil that is always some form of abuse? How are those pathways reestablished or created where they never were in this fleshly life?
The snake lays its eggs. The eggs hatch. The snake parent doesn't nurture or raise the offspring. It's every snake for itself. Human parents and family are not designed to be that way. Humans hand down the learning of nurturing. Many people get better training than do others, and many people have a greater aptitude for learning and predisposition for the higher and highest virtues. Many are less abused. People can change for the better and best though, no matter where the starting point. They only can't if they don't — if they reject it.
Snakes, of course, also come in venomous varieties and in strangling varieties, etc., such that they have been attackers and even devourers of humans for eons, guilty and innocent alike.
Now, Jesus knew that most people could relate to what were, and still are, largely considered "good" parenting skills and "good" "family" relations. He regularly used those concepts to get people to consider the wider implications for the whole of humanity. He did know that many would refuse. He let them go. He didn't demand secular or false-religion legislation to rein them in with threats of violence and imprisonment. He was not and is not coercive. Even his Church is a voluntary place to be.
What he still teaches (through the written words in the New Testament and as those connect with the Old and also teaches through the Holy Spirit he definitely sent as he said he would) is, among many other things, that "good" is vastly better than has been commonly accepted and that real "family" is everyone left after all the rest have rejected the higher and highest good. He raised the standards far above the Old Testament and far above the "modern" standard.
The American Empire and the American people in general aren't even touching the hem of his garment, let alone even attempting to stand upright and side-by-side with him.
I point out that Jesus was, and is, a Real Liberal Christian. He is the one who brought back this censored truth that is the light. After he had spoken it and lived it and was murdered for doing so, the censors set about to re-censor it and did. They couldn't put it out though — couldn't completely extinguish the truth. I wouldn't be saying it now again with all credit to God, just as Jesus, if they had been able to completely block it.
I point out that each of those terms ("real," "liberal," and "Christian," along with "Church") are actually redundant terms — synonyms that are so close that they become one. The term "liberal" here is not the common usage, which common usage is a deliberate corruption of the term. There is no harm in real liberalism. There is no vileness in it. There is only beneficence. "Real" may be understood as the opposite of false-hearted, dark side, and dead of the Holy Spirit. Christian is both real and liberal in those senses. To arrive at living, doing, being those full senses requires what Jesus lives, does, and is in the highest. Finally, the Church is the whole.
Who are they who want to drag it down, censor it, work against it, lessen it, ignore it, etc.? Well, who sides with Jesus and who sides against him? Did the serpents side with him then? Do they now?
We call war-mongers "hawks." We call "peacemakers" blessed and "doves." Why do the hawks not take offense at "hawks" but do take offense at "serpents"? "Hawks" is not yet as telling to the general public, but I must tell you that all hawks are serpents. Why do some say, "Greed is good" but take offense at "serpents"? I tell you there is no difference between the selfish and the serpents. Why do people take offense at serpents when they do not take offense at homosexuality? I tell you the homosexual spirit also comes out from the dark side. It is a choice. It is harmful. Many are abused with it. Many never overcome it. Their very brain matter is transformed by it. Then they claim it is good when it remains confusion and definitely wrong and harmful.
Many arguments were put forth in support of tolerance. I understood that Jesus "tolerated," as in he did not execute wrath but rather told the truth and let the blind follow the blind (blind to the truth) into the ditch of their own making. I have watched while the movement has been corrupted into condoning what was once only to be tolerated. I have watched further while it has moved from condoning to promoting even to the youngest children to get to them before the truth does. I have seen evil at work, and I sound the alarm. I face censorship and other negative reactions for it.
As the American Empire claims to be a light to the world, it murders innocent babies by Hellfire missiles fired from predator drones controlled by armchair, video-gaming serpents in uniform. It tortures those who are not even suspects. It spies on its own without even probable cause or reasonable suspicion. It lies its way into wars for spoils and control. It neglects its poor, whom it treads down for the sakes of the superrich — for the sake of the massive flow of mammon from the bottom up (no trickledown — trickledown is a farce and always has been). All is claimed to be okay in America though — that America is headed in the right direction — because soon, even "don't tell, don't ask" will be a thing of the quaint past and homosexuals may be able to sleep together and have sex in the barracks with the "blessing" of the Empire while they practice murdering the innocent for the sake of homosexual, greedy plutocrats who own them and who, in turn, are owned by the dark-side spirit named by God and Jesus as Satan.
Whose side are you on? I speak truth to warn. I don't tell the secular government what to do other than occasionally to say what at least would be less hypocritical within their fallen, unenlightened system. I do so for spiritual reasons. What I want is the Christian Commons.
Now, if you submit a comment:
What you write here against the Real Liberal Christian Church founded by Jesus Christ will mark you in the Biblical sense unless you show that you have turned and are repenting in time to escape the damnation of your own choosing. That's the way of it. Don't be tempted by the devil to stand opposed to the call of righteousness. Overcome such evil temptation. Help others to help yet others to come to righteous behavior through-and-through.
Check out how even after reading this, people will still take it out of context and twist it to an evil end.