TWITTER-SESSION DIGEST, February 21, 2010
- TWITTER-SESSION DIGEST, February 20, 2010 http://ff.im/-ghQdl..... #
- @beecozz You wrote, "Satan uses scripture too!" He always misapplies it. I don't. You said, "...too." It means you know I'm not Satan. in reply to beecozz #
- @JIDF You wrote, "what about religious zionists? who exactly is the ignoramus?" What about them? I'm a religious Zionist. What's your point? in reply to JIDF #
- Obama’s Stealth Entitlement Commission [I'm not alone!] http://unsilentgeneration.com/.....ommis sion/ #
- ...radical Martin Luther King scrubbed from...memorial? ...hijacked by... corporations that hijacked Obama...Congressional Black Caucus? #
- "A Corporate Hijacking of the MLK Memorial?" http://www.singlepayeraction.o.....og/?p =2111 #
- I favorited a YouTube video -- Chossudovsky: US will start WW3 by attacking Iran http://youtu.be/C4p1kD8CZX8?a..... #
- Chossudovsky: US will start WW3 by attacking Iran http://ff.im/-gikSi..... #
- except the neocons "fear" untraceable suitcase... bombs http://www.guardian.co.uk/comm.....inton -iran #
- An untraceable bomb delivered by suicide could come from any willing nation-state, group, or person. The neocons wouldn't know whom to hit. #
- The solution isn't preemptive or preventive strikes on mere suspects but rather total, global, voluntary disarmament. #
- The Israeli blockade of Gaza is illegal, collective punishment under international law, but Zionists "brand" their Zionist regime as legit. #
- Gaza blockade suffocates http://www.amnesty.org/en/news.....e-201 00118 #
- Among the many problems are tax cuts for the superrich, Ponzi-bankster bailouts, raids on the Social Security trust fund, and insane wars. #
- They knew the Laffer Curve wouldn't work. The ultra-rich scream for entitlement cuts to redistribute worker's wages back to the wealthiest. #
- In 2007, I wrote the "tax cuts for the rich" plan is to privatize entitlements (e.g. Social Security: a solvent trust) http://bit.ly/ccnS9q..... #
- "Wall Street Oligarchs Eying Social Security" I knew it during Reagan -- FDR-knowledge. http://vdare.com/roberts/10021.....curit y.htm #
- Better late than never for Paul Craig Roberts though. Better late than never for us/me too concerning real Christianity. #
- Little fry Libertarian-capitalists are still missing the lessons of the Great Depression. Deregulation is the devouring spirit let loose. #
- Brooksley Born was right but was marginalized during Clinton. Marginalizers are still spewing the evil that is unregulated privatization. #
- They don't know how properly to regulate their feelings, thoughts, words, and deeds. #
- Obama says lawyers' memos authorizing torture aren't "professional misconduct." He's a serpent chosen by serpents to cover serpents. #
- The FBI is still framing Bruce Ivins alone for the 2001 anthrax attacks. Timing, targets, Ivins' ideology, CIPRO, etc., point to a cover-up. #
- "How did we get to a point in America where you get to a certain age in life, regardless of net worth or income, and you’re ... [cont.] #
- [cont.] ...‘entitled’?" Alan Simpson. It's called compassion for the downtrodden, Alan. It's too bad you're such a... [cont.] #
- [cont.] ...hard-hearted suck-up that you have little to none of it. Everyone who has been foreclosed in his or her old age... [cont.] #
- [cont.] ...did not fail to play by the ostensible rules, Alan. You are a serpent, Alan. Repent, or... [cont.] #
- [cont.] ...you'll be entitled to a one-way ticket to Hell. #
- "Bipartisan" campaign targets US working class http://www.wsws.org/articles/2.....-f18. shtml If that article doesn't... [cont.] #
- [cont.] ...convince you that Obama works for the plutocrats, you'll get what you deserve, in this life or the next, but you will get it. #
- Barack Obama is a complete serpent to have chosen Alan Simpson and bankster Erskine Bowles to head up a... [cont.] #
- [cont.] ...commission to make recommendations on entitlements. #
- Alan Simpson is saying that only predators deserve. How would he feel were he the prey? #
- The people are fed up with the banksters, so what does Obama do but appoint bankster-lovers to slash and privatize entitlements. #
- Nationalize the Federal Reserve. Nationalize all Federal Reserve Notes now. Make them all effectively interest-free United States Notes. #
- Take away all of the evil, corrupted and corrupting power of the banksters. The United States never had to borrow, especially at usury. #
- This is easy. It's fundamental. Don't let them trick you into thinking it's complicated. #
- Alan Simpson is a throwback. Social Security is a trust fund filled directly from workers' earnings. His question is moronic. #
- Before Social Security, life for many of the aged, most of whom worked hard all their lives, was poverty stricken at best. #
- One has to be an extremely hard-hearted person to want to go back to how things were before the New Deal. #
- One has to be an extremely evil person to want the Wall Street banksters to privatize everything they want. #
- Overly limited government brought toxic derivatives & securitization poisoning the economy. Why does the Tea Party want more deregulation? #
- Big Pharma researcher admits to faking dozens of research studies http://www.naturalnews.com/028.....fraud .html #
- I just listened to "Glenn Beck's Keynote Speech At CPAC (Part 1) - 02/20/10." He called Teddy Roosevelt a Marxist. TR was no Marxist. #
- Beck only first read TR after McCain said TR was McCain's hero. Beck is a disciple of W. Cleon Skousen. Watch out! #
- Beck puts down government spending; however, the stimulus was not enough and was aimed at the wrong people. The bailout was what was wrong. #
- Once one gets passed the evil hearts behind it, deregulation, which meant not enough government, is what caused the problems. #
- Of course, there is wrong regulation. However, regulation, per se, is not inherently evil. #
- Coercion is the problem, but the unregulated (out-of-self-control) start forcing everyone else. #
- Did he have to pay to go down the street to get there? If he needs a cop or the fire department, does he check his bank account first? #
- He says government doesn't create jobs. Well then, let government stop all the military hiring. #
- Beck's attitude is to let the states, counties, cities, towns, and villages fire everyone. Who needs it according to Glenn Beck. #
- Glenn Beck would have you believe that the government shouldn't be the people's government. #
- Glenn Beck thinks the Constitution is reducible to protecting us from "bad guys." Being self-reliant, he doesn't need even that, does he? #
- He talks about charitable giving by Americans, but if the robber barons get there way, there won't be a middle class with money to spare. #
- He said Americans give 10x more per person than the French. The French give more through taxes and have the world's best health care system. #
- Also, per capita comparisons are not proper. Multibillionaires skew the stats, and the U.S. has much greater abject poverty. #
- Beck puts down socialism by pointing to Cuba, which has been under economic sanctions. Where's the free competition in that? #
- The Scandinavian countries have been largely socialist. Why doesn't he say how terrible life is there by comparison to the U.S.? #
- Then it really comes out. "Go watch the lions eat the weakest." Wow! Does that ever size up the anti-Christ spirit. #
- Even the lions know when to stop though. They are satisfied with enough. The predator capitalists don't know when to stop. #
- Beck doesn't like the Federal Reserve or the Income Tax. I agree but believe in universal health care. I want all the people to want it. #
- Beck is an obstacle though to the spirit of everyone being Christlike about the needs of everyone else. #
- He's against many of the right things to be against but it's from the wrong spirit that keeps him from being for things he should be for. #
- While he rails against Progressivism, he doesn't rail against the spirit of competition but cooperation even coming out from consensus. #
- Beck gives a superficial economics history lesson to the masses of "conservatives." He ignores the TVA, WPA, the superhighway system, etc. #
- I'm not hyping those, but they do fly in the face of Beck's assertions. #
- He ignores the downturn in the middle of FDR's stimulus due to FDR temporarily taking the advice of deficit hawks. #
- He ignores military Keynesianism (mixed economy). It put 6 million to work in Germany and put America back to work. Too bad it was military. #
- @JIDF There are Zionists, & then there are Zionists. Who qualifies every connotation with every use? I have a full context. It's peace. in reply to JIDF #
- Rising sea-level errors is no negation of warming. http://www.guardian.co.uk/envi.....ct-si ddall #
Tom Usher
Standing Comment, all posts and pages:
To all homosexuals and their supporters, condoners, promoters, accepters, confirmers, and the like:
Unless you have something completely new that hasn't already been refuted, don't bother. It won't show up.
Rehashing what has already been refuted is a waste of everyone's time.
I'm not interested in casting pearls before swine, giving the children's bread to the dogs, or rebuking a forever scorner.
Learn or go away: There is zero wisdom in homosexuality. Homosexuality is wrong. Nothing any homosexual or anyone else can say or do will alter it. No one needs the Bible to know it either. It's prima facie. There's no such thing as an unrepentant-homosexual Christian. There never has been and never will be. That's the way of it. If you don't like it, change.
Do site searches on the various topics concerning homosexuality to determine if your "point" has already been handled. Currently, I provide three different search methods. The "WordPress" search is still the most thorough.
The same can be done regarding militarism, capitalism, coercion, and many other main issues and themes.
TREATMENT, RUDENESS, POLITENESS, OFFENSE, TRUTH
Many times over the course of this website's existence, I've had commentators complain about how I've treated them and/or others. Much less frequently has anyone taken exception to those commentator's comments. I assume that's because for one, I appear to be holding my own.
Often, I have raised the fact that Jesus called certain people "serpents." I've often also mentioned how he cleaned the temple with whip in hand, not that he used it on anyone. It certainly doesn't say that he did, and neither was he charged with it in the kangaroo court of the serpents who ended up murdering him by proxy just for, among other wonderful things, speaking out and speaking truth.
If I say that those who are engaged in serpentine behavior are the New Testament "serpents," then why take offense at my saying it rather than standing with Jesus and me about it?
If others don't like it that I treat others or them the way I have in this regard, why don't they take it up with the serpents and/or their own consciences and God?
If I wanted to catch flies, I'd use honey. I don't want flies on this level. Human beings aren't to be on the level of flies. If the truth is bitter as vinegar, then ask yourself why and learn to taste it as sweet but not sickeningly so. Why attack the message and messenger, as the serpents did, and become a serpent by so doing?
The issue is not "name calling" on some bratty, childish level. When Jesus said "serpents," he was not being as a brat. His level was completely adult to adults and children. He dared say that the children understood the clear and plain truth before the adults who, afterall, had been abused and socialized by the serpents. He still calls adults back. Those who hear him and know his voice (truth) turn around and do the other required things together as well.
What is it for a human being to be more serpentine or reptilian than what God initially gave? What was and remains Jesus's point? What is the reptilian brain versus the vastly higher human brain with its cerebral cortex and frontal and temporal lobes and specific areas of altruistic sentiments and abilities? What are those higher areas before they are damaged, before the communication pathways to them and between them are diminished by evil that is always some form of abuse? How are those pathways reestablished or created where they never were in this fleshly life?
The snake lays its eggs. The eggs hatch. The snake parent doesn't nurture or raise the offspring. It's every snake for itself. Human parents and family are not designed to be that way. Humans hand down the learning of nurturing. Many people get better training than do others, and many people have a greater aptitude for learning and predisposition for the higher and highest virtues. Many are less abused. People can change for the better and best though, no matter where the starting point. They only can't if they don't — if they reject it.
Snakes, of course, also come in venomous varieties and in strangling varieties, etc., such that they have been attackers and even devourers of humans for eons, guilty and innocent alike.
Now, Jesus knew that most people could relate to what were, and still are, largely considered "good" parenting skills and "good" "family" relations. He regularly used those concepts to get people to consider the wider implications for the whole of humanity. He did know that many would refuse. He let them go. He didn't demand secular or false-religion legislation to rein them in with threats of violence and imprisonment. He was not and is not coercive. Even his Church is a voluntary place to be.
What he still teaches (through the written words in the New Testament and as those connect with the Old and also teaches through the Holy Spirit he definitely sent as he said he would) is, among many other things, that "good" is vastly better than has been commonly accepted and that real "family" is everyone left after all the rest have rejected the higher and highest good. He raised the standards far above the Old Testament and far above the "modern" standard.
The American Empire and the American people in general aren't even touching the hem of his garment, let alone even attempting to stand upright and side-by-side with him.
I point out that Jesus was, and is, a Real Liberal Christian. He is the one who brought back this censored truth that is the light. After he had spoken it and lived it and was murdered for doing so, the censors set about to re-censor it and did. They couldn't put it out though — couldn't completely extinguish the truth. I wouldn't be saying it now again with all credit to God, just as Jesus, if they had been able to completely block it.
I point out that each of those terms ("real," "liberal," and "Christian," along with "Church") are actually redundant terms — synonyms that are so close that they become one. The term "liberal" here is not the common usage, which common usage is a deliberate corruption of the term. There is no harm in real liberalism. There is no vileness in it. There is only beneficence. "Real" may be understood as the opposite of false-hearted, dark side, and dead of the Holy Spirit. Christian is both real and liberal in those senses. To arrive at living, doing, being those full senses requires what Jesus lives, does, and is in the highest. Finally, the Church is the whole.
Who are they who want to drag it down, censor it, work against it, lessen it, ignore it, etc.? Well, who sides with Jesus and who sides against him? Did the serpents side with him then? Do they now?
We call war-mongers "hawks." We call "peacemakers" blessed and "doves." Why do the hawks not take offense at "hawks" but do take offense at "serpents"? "Hawks" is not yet as telling to the general public, but I must tell you that all hawks are serpents. Why do some say, "Greed is good" but take offense at "serpents"? I tell you there is no difference between the selfish and the serpents. Why do people take offense at serpents when they do not take offense at homosexuality? I tell you the homosexual spirit also comes out from the dark side. It is a choice. It is harmful. Many are abused with it. Many never overcome it. Their very brain matter is transformed by it. Then they claim it is good when it remains confusion and definitely wrong and harmful.
Many arguments were put forth in support of tolerance. I understood that Jesus "tolerated," as in he did not execute wrath but rather told the truth and let the blind follow the blind (blind to the truth) into the ditch of their own making. I have watched while the movement has been corrupted into condoning what was once only to be tolerated. I have watched further while it has moved from condoning to promoting even to the youngest children to get to them before the truth does. I have seen evil at work, and I sound the alarm. I face censorship and other negative reactions for it.
As the American Empire claims to be a light to the world, it murders innocent babies by Hellfire missiles fired from predator drones controlled by armchair, video-gaming serpents in uniform. It tortures those who are not even suspects. It spies on its own without even probable cause or reasonable suspicion. It lies its way into wars for spoils and control. It neglects its poor, whom it treads down for the sakes of the superrich — for the sake of the massive flow of mammon from the bottom up (no trickledown — trickledown is a farce and always has been). All is claimed to be okay in America though — that America is headed in the right direction — because soon, even "don't tell, don't ask" will be a thing of the quaint past and homosexuals may be able to sleep together and have sex in the barracks with the "blessing" of the Empire while they practice murdering the innocent for the sake of homosexual, greedy plutocrats who own them and who, in turn, are owned by the dark-side spirit named by God and Jesus as Satan.
Whose side are you on? I speak truth to warn. I don't tell the secular government what to do other than occasionally to say what at least would be less hypocritical within their fallen, unenlightened system. I do so for spiritual reasons. What I want is the Christian Commons.
Now, if you submit a comment:
What you write here against the Real Liberal Christian Church founded by Jesus Christ will mark you in the Biblical sense unless you show that you have turned and are repenting in time to escape the damnation of your own choosing. That's the way of it. Don't be tempted by the devil to stand opposed to the call of righteousness. Overcome such evil temptation. Help others to help yet others to come to righteous behavior through-and-through.
Check out how even after reading this, people will still take it out of context and twist it to an evil end.