FALSE-ZIONIST ROT: GAZA AND ON AND ON AND ON

When we entered a house, we were supposed to bust down the door and start shooting inside and just go up story by story... I call that murder. Each story, if we identify a person, we shoot them. I asked myself - how is this reasonable?" — An Israeli soldier about the recent Gaza attacks

War is a crime. The 22-day Cast Lead Operation of the Israel Defense Force (IDF) was a huge crime.

Israel is still expanding illegal settlements. What else is there to know? It says it all, doesn't it?

Illegal: illegal under UN Security Council resolutions and The Fourth Geneva Convention

The group called Peace Now says Israel plans to double the number of illegal settlers in the West Bank. Hillary Clinton referred to Palestinian house demolitions by Israel as being merely "unhelpful." Israel also performs illegal mining operations in Palestine thereby stealing Palestinian resources in addition to illegally occupying their lands (land grabbing, land thieving).

The Israeli self-styled settlers in the West Bank and East Jerusalem are illegal aliens every bit as much as any Mexican in the U.S. without a mundanely valid permit. If it's wrong of those Mexicans, it's wrong of those Zionists Jews. Some Mexicans come to the U.S. and then cause violent problems. Very few do though. They don't come to steal back the land that was once theirs (still is under the real God). Most Mexicans are Indians (or, as they are supposedly correctly referred to politically, "Native Americans"). Well, we're all native Earthlings, so far, aren't we?


In the meantime, Obama planned to boycott the World Conference Against Racism, set for April, if the conference refused to be censored concerning political Zionists' being racist toward Palestinians. The U.N. caved in to the Likudniks. Those who can wave their pinky finger and conjure up tens of trillions of dollars for their buddies can force most of the world to say bitter is sweet.


Charles "Chas" Freeman has been forced to withdraw as the nominee to be Obama's intelligence analyst because Freeman didn't brownnose the Jewish Lobby {American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), et al.}.

Freeman wrote the following:

The tactics of the Israel Lobby plumb the depths of dishonor and indecency...The aim of this Lobby is control of the policy process through the exercise of a veto over the appointment of people who dispute the wisdom of its views, the substitution of political correctness for analysis, and the exclusion of any and all options for decision by Americans and our government other than those that it favors. I regret that my willingness to serve the new administration has ended by casting doubt on its ability to consider, let alone decide what policies might best serve the interests of the United States rather than those of a Lobby intent on enforcing the will and interests of a foreign government.

Senator Chuck Schumer took credit for derailing him. Schumer is a Zionist through-and-through. He is an Israel-Firster. He, along with Senator Diane Feinstein, cut the backroom deal so the torture-denier, Michael Mukasey, could become the U.S. Attorney General under Bush-43. They are all false-hearted Zionists who have no business running anything. This is no endorsement of Freeman.

It was far from just Charles Schumer who attacked Freeman for telling the truth. Steven Rosen attacked him. "Rosen faces imminent federal criminal prosecution under the Espionage Act for transferring top-secret Pentagon documents to the Israeli Embassy. Rosen's accomplice, Larry Franklin, is serving a 12-year sentence," wrote Pat Buchanan in his article, "Of Patriots and Assassins," Creators Syndicate, March 18, 2009. Pat names names: Gabriel Schoenfeld, Tom Piatak, Jonah Goldberg, Michael Rubin, Rich Lowry, Jonathan Chait, Jeffrey Goldberg, Marty Peretz, and Michael Goldfarb all attacked according to Pat.

Joe Klein wrote that Freeman "was the victim of a mob, not a lobby." Joe is saying that AIPAC is a mob. It's the Likud Lobby.

It's long since time that the AIPAC be officially declared the agent of a foreign state, which it most certainly is. It's long since time that the Zionist Project stop running American foreign policy. It's long since time that American taxpayers stop footing the bill for Israel's military occupations and attacks, oil, nuclear weapons, spying (including on America), etc. The energies of the American people need to be going to productive things rather than the devouring spirit that is the unGodly, unrighteous, unjustifiable Zionist Project. It's high time the American people uphold what is best for, and of, Jewish people over the false-hearted, false propaganda spewing Zionists.

I won't rewrite what has already been written extremely well. I highly recommend my readers visit this link and read the article: "Tomgram: Robert Dreyfuss, The Freeman Affair": "Is the Israel Lobby Running Scared?: Or Killing a Chicken to Scare the Monkeys," by Robert Dreyfuss. Tom Dispatch. March 15, 2009.

You thought there is no such lobby — the lobby that isn't but yet managed to bring down Charles Freeman and embarrassed Barack into caving in. Now, if you want to really show that you're brainwashed enough, say Charles who and Barack who? Abe Foxman at the Jewish Anti-Defamation League (anti-truth league) will smile upon you. All the Jews who are against the false-Zionists and who are going to suffer discrimination on account of the fascist acts of the Likud won't smile though. They know that the fascists are just playing into the hands of the real racists, who are also fascists.

Abe Foxman is anti-Semitic. He hates Jews. What do you think about that? If he loved them, he'd want what's best for them, as I do.


Furthermore, the Israelis are simply ignoring the lip service to fairness coming from Hillary Clinton concerning the Gaza blockade. Israel is still blocking even toothpaste and diapers from crossing over into Gaza — anything to make life as miserable as possible to get them to leave the land to the false-hearted, unbiblical (except in the most negative sense), Zionist Project. Of course there are plenty of false Christians claiming that that Zionist Project represents the rightful return of the Israelites to the Promised Land. Well, I'm on record saying it is not. Only warmongers support that mostly atheist, secular Zionist Project. Besides, the god they do worship when they do is Satan (the god of this worldly world). Who doesn't know that who has read the Bible and understands Jesus at all?

In addition, Hillary says that aid to Gaza from the U.S. will require Hamas to acknowledge Israel's (the current state of) right to exist and require Hamas to renounce violence. Hamas has already accepted Israel, provided Israel return to the Green Line. As for renouncing violence, what hypocrisy! Does the U.S. renounce violence? Does Israel renounce violence? They do not. I do though. Should Hamas renounce violence? Yes, it should. It should call Israel's bluff.


Obama has also renewed the sanctions against Iran just because he can. He has zero evidence against them. He's just following the American tradition of Presidents building upon the former empire building of previous Presidents despite criticisms before taking office made about the policies of sitting and previous office holders.

Iran can have a nuclear weapon if other countries can. They have no lesser rights among nations. Israel has nuclear weapons. Iran can withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty any time it wants. No nation has any more right to attack Iran based upon the notion that Iran could make a bomb then any nation has the right to attack any other nuclear nation right now (just because) or attack every nation on Earth since every nation is potentially a nuclear-weapons power. Satan may as well exterminate humanity since human potential is whatever Satan can imagine, so imagines Satan. Where's the logic? Where's the absence of hypocrisy?


We know that Arab oil is shipped to U.S. refineries and then shipped back to Israel to attack Gaza and Lebanon. We know that U.S. financial aid to Israel is really military aid — $30 billion a decade. It's the U.S. taxpayers giving money to Israel tied to weapons deals with U.S. manufacturers for 74% of the grant money.


What are the Zionists saying about Hamas making Islamic Jihad stop firing rockets? Are they facing the facts that Hamas is not beyond being able to be reasoned with? The silence is deafening, as they say.


The bankers control the currencies. They decide who gets what. They are running the Obama administration, just as they ran the Bush administration. They don't like the Islamic economic system that borrowed so heavily from the ancient Jewish text that further borrowed from the world's religious notions. It's a war between families, nations, the flesh. They want to sink the Persians (Iranians).

Why are Zionists running the world? They are you know. The answer is money (mammon). It's usury and the control of the medium of exchange or dollars for trade. Ultimately, they have a monopoly of power over it.


Fascist, Avigdor Lieberman, leader of the Yisrael Beitenu party in Israel, is set to become the new Foreign Minister of Israel. How much longer with the U.S. support fascists? How much longer will the U.S. keep funding them and supplying them with weapons and fuel? When will the U.S. learn?

If Lieberman's pronouncements are to be taken seriously—and there is no obvious reason they should not be—a Lieberman government would exclude some Arab citizens from Israel, would expel others who refuse to sign a loyalty-to-Zionism oath, would turn Gaza into Grozny and would execute Arab members of the Knesset who talk to Hamas or mark Israel Independence Day as the anniversary of the displacement of the Palestinians in 1948. (Source: "The Rise of Avigdor Lieberman," by Ben Lynfield. The Nation. December 14, 2006.)

"I very much favor democracy, but when there is a contradiction between democratic and Jewish values, the Jewish and Zionist values are more important." — Avigdor Lieberman

American tax dollars are funding that!

I don't want any ill to befall anyone anywhere. I want the Zionists and the Muslims to turn from iniquity.

"...outrageous, abominable, hate-filled campaign, brimming with incitement that, if left unchecked, could lead Israel to the gates of hell." — Rabbi Eric Yoffie, president of the Union for Reform Judaism concerning the Avigdor Lieberman campaign


Israeli Troops Shoot US Activist in West Bank

An American activist from Oakland, California was critically injured Friday when Israeli soldiers fired a tear gas canister directly at his head during a weekly nonviolent protest against the wall in the West Bank village of N'alin. Thirty-seven-year-old Tristan Anderson is the fourth member of the International Solidarity Movement to be critically injured or killed by the Israeli military since 2003.

Jonathan Pollack of the ISM: "He was shot at directly with a tear gas projectile, with an extended range tear gas projectile from about fifty to sixty meters. And the impact caused several condensed fractures to his skull and collapsation of his eye socket. He was operated on in the hospital a few hours later in critical condition, and large portions of his frontal lobe had to be removed, because it was splattered with bone fragments as a result of the impact of the tear gas canister."

During their weekly demonstrations since last April, four unarmed N'alin residents have been killed and over 400 injured by the Israeli Defense Forces.
democracynow.org

If two decades ago comparisons to the South African apartheid system felt like hyperbole, they now feel charitable. The white South African regime, for all its crimes, never attacked the Bantustans with anything like the destructive power Israel visited on Gaza in December and January, when nearly 1,300 Palestinians were killed, one-third of them children.
...
Opposing Zionism is neither anti-Semitic nor particularly radical. It requires only that we take our own values seriously and no longer, as the book of Amos has it, "turn justice into wormwood and hurl righteousness to the ground."

Establishing a secular, pluralist, democratic government in Israel and Palestine would of course mean the abandonment of the Zionist dream. It might also mean the only salvation for the Jewish ideals of justice that date back to Jeremiah. — Ben Ehrenreich ("Zionism is the problem: The Zionist ideal of a Jewish state is keeping Israelis and Palestinians from living in peace," by Ben Ehrenreich. Los Angeles Times. March 15, 2009.)

In his opinion piece, "Is anti-Zionism hate?," UCLA professor Judea Pearl writing in the Los Angeles Times also March 15, 2009, states, "Anti-Zionism rejects the very notion that Jews are a nation." Now that's lame. He says, "Anti-Semitism rejects Jews as equal members of the human race; anti-Zionism rejects Israel as an equal member in the family of nations." Wrong on the second part, not that he has it completely right concerning who is a Semite. All bloodline Jews are Semites, but not all Semites are bloodline Jews. He claims that the Zionists have had a "relentless drive for peace." Now that's Karl Rove at his best/worst, meaning attack the opposition at its strongest point. It works provided Rove's opposition doesn't know how to say, "dung."

The anti-Zionist's strongest points are the obviousness of the false Zionist's warmongering and empire building. Rove and this Judea Pearl want thought termination. They want you hypnotized into believing that the Zionists have not horned their way in and horned others out of their homes and off their land — this mostly after WWII and what the Nazis did to everyone. They want you to nod in agreement at anything and everything said by the Zionists and Likudniks. Are you going to sell your soul to Satan? It was wrong what the Zionists did. Who doesn't know it?

He argues that because other states have majority ethnic groups that Israel is thusly entitled. Please, which other states that have been involved in ethnic cleansing and land grabbing is he asking us to support? I support no such states. His point is worthless. The reason anti-Zionism has people such as Pearl running so scared is because the false, and they are false, Zionists stole the land by violence and coercion.

He says, "anti-Zionist rhetoric has become a mark of academic sophistication and social acceptance in certain extreme yet vocal circles of U.S. academia and media elite." Look at the psychological operations going on there. The arguments against Zionism are coming out of academic research and knowledge of history. One has to be elite to get the truth because it's banned from the mainstream media. Think about that. Here's a university professor warning the "common" people to be on guard against other university professors telling the truth about the history of Palestine.

Palestine was not a land without a people. The Zionists who went there reported back to the Zionist conference that Palestine was taken. The Zionists decided to go there and horn out the people living there, and that's exactly what they did. Pearl wants you to just look the other way even though much of the damage was done after WWII that was ostensibly fought to stop violent land grabbing (lebensraum; living space; Nazi imperialism). You are asked to look the other way because along with an estimated 20 million Russians and others, an estimated 6 million Jews were killed, many in camps with an estimated 5 million non-Jews. How many people died in WWII? Perhaps over 70 million died; but even if that is a grossly inflated number, how often do the Zionists think about other than the alleged "6 million"?

Tolstoy put it at around 10 million Russians dying by the Nazis and 20 million by Stalin and the NKVD. The 6-million Jews figure is flat-out false. Even Raul Hilberg, the most celebrated Jewish holocaust-historian of all time, put it at 5.1 million; but he has been shown to have used more than questionable secondary source materials. The 5 million figure is also a Zionist "estimate."

If they had moved into the area with completely peaceful, compassionate intentions, and stayed that way, the anti-Zionist movement would be comprised solely of anti-Jews of the ethnic bigot and racist variety. That's not the case though. The truth is that many of the same people and caliber/spirit of people who opposed the racist Apartheid South African regime are standing up to the Pearls of the world. Frankly, anyone who doesn't stand up to them ought to be ashamed. The South African Afrikaners (most White settlers of Dutch extraction) were nowhere near as murderous as the Zionists have been and still are and plan to be. That's just the plain truth, and nothing Judea Pearl says or writes will alter it.

Really, he's defending the use of White Phosphorus (which they lied about but then were forced to admit — liars!) and all the other things that resulted in the murder of some 900 civilians in Gaza. That's just a couple of years after what the Zionists did to Lebanon. He's insane.
Google search-results: "White Phosphorus" Gaza March 15, 2009

I joined politicalnet.ning.com (Wednesday, March 18, 2009) and added the following discussion topic there:

Equating Anti-Zionism with Anti-Ethnic Jew

Hi All,

I don't have much time right this moment to add some extensive post, but I'm thinking about the issue of labeling people anti-Semitic and conflating that with anti-Zionist when the person being so labeled is definitely not an ethnic bigot or racist but rather wants only the best (harmless/beneficial) for Jews and Arabs and everyone, frankly. I've framed this topic a bit, but feel free to raise religion and culture, etc.

Tags: Anti-Zionism, Anti-Jew, anti-Semitic, anti-Zionist "ethnic bigot" racist, Jews, Arabs, religion, culture

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.