Pat Oliphant did the political cartoon above showing the spirit of the false-Zionists. The pro-Zionist faction (Simon Wiesenthal Center and Jewish Anti-Defamation League) whined about it, of course. What they did was see in it how the Nazis depicted the Jews. What they didn't do was openly reflect on how the shoe fits. All they did was think about themselves. To Hell with the Gazans is their attitude concerning the cartoon. They proved the cartoon's point about false-Zionists.

The cartoon says nothing about all Jews, many of whom God loves for standing resolutely against the false-Zionist Fascists. The cartoon is not anti-Semitic or anti-Jew. It's anti-Fascist. It's right on.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
    • Bless Up Tom,

      great commentary on a cartoon.

      the reality is that those folks who are bitchin are NOT the JEWS; They are the Israeli's.

      Israel is not the home of the Real JEWS.

      israel is a contrivance created by the new world order in 1939 in the so called united nations.

      look to the Land of Axum;

      where you will find my forefathers the Falasha's.

      WE Are Not Complaining as We Understand the Reality of the Situation.

      Those who stole our name and attempt to co-opt our heritage and religious tenants are just interlopers.

      we reconize them as the ones who brag about killing old women and children, in gaza today.

      their homes will be marked by their selfmade bloodstains, which today show's them as the infidels; not the peacemakers. even their own soldiers are coming forth and admitting to their murders, out of religious guilt.

      Tell the Truth Pastor, Tell The Truth !

      Peace and Love


      • Hello RE,

        This is a huge and interesting area for study: Who Is a Jew: Beta Israel.

        The following is connected to your comment but also to the 9-11 Series on your site. Please use it on your site as a short post or within one of your posts if you find it worthy.

        The most important question in the Bible is, "What is truth?" The answer is being Christ. Is Christ myth? Christ is not myth if we do the work. Christ is the story fulfilled. We are the body incarnate if we will bring forth.

        I do not deny the historical Jesus, who fulfilled the stories (ancient prophecies, Mosaic and earlier, Egyptian, etc.) in the flesh. I do not jump to false conclusions. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

        Many people build houses of cards against houses of cards. They build with missing cards — cards that where destroyed/refuted elsewhere but the continuity is lost to them. I speak here of people who deny Christian/Jesus's spirit. I speak here of the mind behind the Zeitgeist 9-11 Truth documentary. Again, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

        A little knowledge of astrology is a dangerous thing. Then, a lack of knowledge of the world prophecy is a dangerous thing. An arrogant attitude toward the question of from whenst reality arises is a dangerous thing.

        The mind(s) behind the Zeitgeist film decide the motivations of others concerning often the tiniest detail that can be explained elsewise. This harms the impact of credible questions.

        That 9-11 was an inside job can be discerned from big-picture aspects while leaving open the questions concerning the finer details.

        We know them (the neocons) by their fruit.

        Whether or not they were thinking particular thoughts when they devised and carried out their 9-11 scheme is something God knows. Whether or not every detail was handled by evil genius rather than much of it being cock-up (a blunder, a mess) should be left as questions for a new and proper criminal investigation.

        We do not defend ourselves from attacks made against fundamentalist televangelists. We are not Old Testament. We are New Testament. Neither do we believe in mammon but rather seek to translate it (mammon, which has been forced upon us all by the wicked) into it's opposite: The Christian Commons.

        Bless You,


    • Thomas James

      One of the biggest arguments against pacifism concerns Adolph Hitler in that he was so evil for killing so many Jews that since Hitler cannot be reasoned with the only thing that he understands is to use overwhelming military force against him.

      The most overwhelming military force I can think of is to use Cobalt atomic bombs. Cobalt atomic bombs are so dirty that they allow deadly amounts of radiation to linger for a period of 5 years which makes it impractical to hide out for very long in fall out shelters or bunkers. Of course cobalt bombs could destroy all life as we know it but I suppose if pacifism does not work then that means we have to employ the Samson option which means that if we are going to commit mass suicide we have to bring as many of those evil Nazi's down to hell with us so we can get our revenge.

      Of course I am saying all of this very sarcastically but I really think that the world has to find a better way to solve its problems and should be looking for Jesus to be the solution rather than the Samson or the Masada option.

      • Hi Thomas,

        It is so-called "politically incorrect" of me to say this. Hitler was the wrath. In more detail, he was a reflection. He held that because the Jews were so evil (for among other things, having been the European banking oligarchy and plutocracy — Rothschilds and others — who better funded the enemies of Germany during WWI) and could not be reasoned with, they required the Final Solution. That was very Zionist of him.

        Anyone who won't condone the Likudnik-Zionist spirit of a) lebensraum (living room in Canaan that was called Palestine by the Roman Empire) or b) genocide is the enemy of the Hitlerian spirit.

        For mine Angel shall go before thee, and bring thee in unto the Amorites, and the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Canaanites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites: and I will cut them off. (Exodus 23:23 KJVR)

        But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee: (Deuteronomy 20:17 KJVR)

        We are not Old Testament though. We are New Testament:

        "Woe unto the world because of offences! for it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!" (Matthew 18:7 KJVR)

        Yes, I'm equating Jabotinsky-Zionists and the hard-hearted followers of Moses with Nazis to a certain extent. I am not saying they are strictly identical, just as black and white horses are not identical but are horses of different shades. I am saying both come out from the dysfunctional, brought to the world by more of the same preceding.

        They don't know how (unwilling) to bring themselves to have the violence and selfishness and deception end within so that their opposites {1) peace 2) giving and sharing all with other than the immediate bloodline tribes and 3) truth} will be all that comes forth.

        Oh, in certain places in Europe, one isn't allowed even to touch upon such thoughts. They censor getting at truth.

        Thomas, you are too sane for the neocons. They need brinkmanship. They need the founder of the Hudson Institute, Hermann Kahn, who said global thermonuclear exchange is winnable, survivable, and worth it.

        Samson was Nazir only somewhat. The real Nazarite is unfit for death.

        Of course you are right that the world should be looking to Jesus. Jesus though came to sort. Everything in this world isn't fit. Be fit. Tell others what that entails. If they hate the truth, let them fall. You can't stop them. Jesus doesn't stop them. God doesn't stop them. Satan pushes and pulls them.

        You are also right to raise Masada. Those who fell there high up had rejected Christ. The self-styled somewhat revisionist historian Benny Morris has appealed to that spirit as likely the inevitable outcome for the current iteration of the twisted version of the Shining City of Peace on the Hill.

        It takes televangelists and false-Christian false-Zionists to facilitate Benny committing suicide in the flesh. He's already dead of the spirit.

        Bless All,

        Tom Usher