UPDATE Thursday, December 03, 2009: I had told Google Blog Search that if they stopped censoring me, I'd say so on this Blog. As of this "UPDATE," Google Blog Search is now showing 1,967 posts as indexed and linked. () That's up again from only 4 at one point. Therefore, I'm adding this update.
1,967 is not all of the posts, but it seems that perhaps they are slowly re-indexing the site. I give them the benefit of the doubt. I haven't looked to see if they are avoiding "controversial" posts.
It has occurred to me that the allusion in the title of this post has gone unconnected and that the title is taken as a common plea on my part. It is not a common plea. I am asking for help, for no one brings forth alone; however, I am asking for help with bringing forth the Christian Commons, as no one deserves it who doesn't help bring it forth. I want everyone who can receive it to deserve it and to have it. I am not asking for help in solving a riddle. There is no riddle on my part about the *ane *llman here.
What the title is alluding to is the movie, "Who Is Harry Kellerman and Why Is He Saying Those Terrible Things About Me?" For those who know the movie (and I have not seen it since it was first release to the theaters) and who also may have some insight, I am not *ane *llman. *ane *llman is *ane *llman. If that is cryptic to readers, that's not my intention. Just consider the title, "Who is...". Who really is....
This is not an endorsement of the film by the way. For one, I remember feeling at the time that Dustin Hoffman did not fit the scene, as it were. I suspect that many of my contemporaries felt the same way at the time.
What I'm saying is that *ane *llman is not my alter ego. He is not my arch-anything. I am not a Marvel comic book character. I don't subscribe to the gratuitous violence, etc., of that whole mindset. To those men amongst you with your comic book collections who are offended by that and think Marvel or DC Comics is on a par with or supersedes the Gospel of Jesus (and is not misleading and harmful if not highly qualified), it's not my fault. However, discussions to qualify can be enlightening if properly constructed and received.
I don't go in for the whole Matrix-movie-series-type statement. Freedom is freedom from evil. It is not freedom to do evil. If you don't think that supposed freedom to do evil is the underlying message of those movies, that's your problem. This is also not an invitation to Marvel enthusiast to defend Marvel or the Wachowski brothers. You might have your opportunity in future posts. We'll see.
I've written this after having only glanced at your comment. I did not read it word-for-word. I may not. What I did pick up from a quick scan is certainly more than enough to know that you haven't a real clue. By the way, I don't owe it to you to read your statement word-for-word, especially after your previous dark-side statements and seeing that you haven't changed or seen the light that definitely is here.
I've been in the middle of working to spread the real message of Jesus Christ, not the phony one where openly and totally unrepentant homosexuals (fiercely proselytizing for their buggery, etc.) kneel at the communion rail right next to heterosexuals who know this about those homosexuals but "accept" them and "affirm" them provided for now that they claim monogamy and fidelity in filthy and utterly disgusting buggery. You don't count that as error though — where there is nothing wrong with that "narrow" opening in the gate for homosexuality, although there is in their minds, plenty wrong with other things for a while until that gate is opened further for some and shut completely for others. I focus in on your cause here to start, and it is your cause, because it is your cause here (it's what you're arguing; you chimed it on it) and I'm still addressing you here directly.
Here's what's going on with you. You're the proverbial dog in the manger. You're not alone. In fact, there are more dogs than souls who can partake. You can't eat what's on offer, and you bark and snap and growl in front of the food. Do you and your proverbial kind know what you're all doing?
Telling about you in particular, *ane, is that while you can't eat the spiritual food that would result in the New Heaven coming to form the New Earth without turmoil were there no "dogs," you allude to how great the food really is. You do. It's there. You think your obvious hedging will save you. It won't.
You didn't address any of the specifics of the Christian Commons that comes out from the Holy Spirit; and if you were to do so now, it would only be in a mad scramble to increase the volume of your barking, to twist in the minds of others what you can see but don't want them to see or hear and understand and eat.
What you say to others is, don't go in because the person, the soul, saying that what he's offering is consistent with what Jesus Christ was saying we ought to do, really doesn't believe it. Of course, you and I both know that you don't believe that. You have nothing upon which to base your accusation. There is no history that shows I do not believe in the Commons as I've presented it. You can point to nothing. All you can do is tell others that my theology is something I don't believe in.
I'm right that Jesus was/is a communist in the original sense before the lost Marx breathed his first. I'm right that the capitalists misstate the parables and the other things for effect. I'm right that Jesus was/is a total pacifist. I'm right that the militants misstate the parables and the other things for effect. I'm right that Jesus was/is for heterosexual-only sex if there is to be any sex at all, which there doesn't have to be since we are spirit after the flesh if you believe as I do. I'm right that the homosexuals misstate the parables and the other things for effect.
Now, who are you? You don't give a URL. Don't you have any URL? Do have no blog or even-slightly verified Twitter account or public membership-profile anywhere? Are you in the Book, or are you unlisted and unpublished? I'm not asking why you didn't supply a URL for the people. I'm pointing it out that you didn't while I know you could have but deliberately (not subconsciously) decided not to because you like to dish it out while you are unwilling to stand where others can publicly comment about your positions in a way that is as lasting as here and that is directly connected to you so that anyone and everyone can know that it is that *ane (you, your sole/soul identity) and not some other. Considering the field you're in, if you have no such URL, it would only prove my point all the more. You would have to go way out of your way to stay hidden. In fact, I don't think you've been able to do that. I think you have URL's you could have used here that would identify you with your evil spewing here. You do, don't you! Of course, you are depending on me not to divulge who you are even though I'm the most despicable person on the face of the Earth if what you say about me here is true. Have I moved you to now divulge yourself with protestations that I've misread the lack of a URL? Are you that computer careless or unaware? I know better.
If what you say about me here is true, then I'm the Anti-Christ, and not just an anti-Christ, not just one of the many, many antichrists John says existed then (whose spiritual and flesh offspring are on view now more than then) and all contrary to your worthless point about my use of the term "anti-Christ."
Interesting though that if I am that one, where's my evil power? Why don't I summons it up as Satan does? Why am I calling for turning the worldly Empire right-side up and leveling it, per Jesus? What's in that for Satan? Do you hold that the Anglo-American-Israeli Empire is Christian built upon Jesus's way? If this puts you in mind of Jesus's teaching that a house divided cannot stand, it ought to. If the reason Jesus said it to the Pharisees slithering around saying much the same things against him that you are saying about me also applies to you here, then who are you, a proverbial dog-snake or actually a dog-snake who shape-shifted into human form before the womb? Spirit, *ane, which one is your root, since you are against the Christian Commons?
You have accused me here of taking some sort of twisted, self-satisfying pleasure (with a sexual allusion that still shows your bent) in getting at the root cause (theology; God study) of all that ails that is selfishness. Do you really want to continue attempting to make that case? You've tried and failed to use logic here, whether Aristotelian or Christian. They aren't the same, since you apparently didn't know it or have just hidden it.
So *ane, I hate what you say and a tree is known by its fruit. Am I advocating that people do violence on your body and mind and soul, or am I saving souls with the truth? Are you going to turn me in to the Satanic court? Are your feelings hurt while I have none? "Can't we all just agree that anyone can do anything that he wants?" Are you a fan of Aleister Crowley? His moral compass was broken. He would be the first to complain were the greatest demons to work him over endlessly. Where is his soul now? Should we have taken communion with him while he was here? He was bi-sexual and orgiastic in the extreme you know. He was a Freemason too, quite high. I've been censored by Google Blog Search for stating these truths about his type. They started by blocking a few posts where I identify the evil.
- GOOGLE CENSORING BY DELAYING SEARCH RESULTS?
- GOOGLE'S HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA: CENSOR REAL CHRISTIANITY
- GOOGLE CENSORING THIS SITE: TRUTH, AMONG OTHER TRUTHS, THAT HOMOSEX IS A CHOICE, ALWAYS HARMFUL, AND ANTICHRIST
- ALFRED KINSEY REPORTS: SEXUAL-REVOLUTION DEVOLUTION, GNOSTICISM, MYSTERY RELIGIONS, FREEMASONRY, FOUNDING FATHERS
That last one was the one that apparently moved them to censorship out of fear that people would learn the truth. Thousands of post disappeared from Google Blog Search after that one. Cowards and liars for dupes
You don't care about any of that though. You're standing with Alfred Kinsey's lying supporters and against me here whether you would now claim to have been doing otherwise. Remember, you are trying to get people to run from what I'm saying (all of it since it's all summated in the New Commandment with which I hold).
The heavy-metal lovers know full well who Aleister Crowley was. They know that the spirit of mammon follows and leads. John Lennon knew it too. Johnny Depp knows it. Ask him. Unless the publicly published reports are false, he has openly stated that he knows that the dark side has been instrumental in his fame and fortune. It's common knowledge in Hollywood and Bollywood, etc. Tom Cruise knows. Steven Spielberg knows. Who, who is high up in Hollywood doesn't know? Who, who is high up in the "pop" music industry doesn't know? Who, who is high up in American politics doesn't know? They all know, and they all know I know. What do you know?
*ane, you don't know what you're doing even though you know what you're doing at the same time.
What you haven't been here is a help to Christ's cause in the world to save it, at least on the side that will see him for real. You have been a help in increasing the division of the goats from the sheep, but you're standing with the goats.
As for having the last word here, well, yes, I have that. You have the last, dead, dark word where you are where you can claim it's light when it isn't. Do you want to open up where I can comment where everyone can see who "knows" you, or will? When you have that place, let me know. I'll come over and leave comments you can deal with if you're able. [sarcasm; read on] If you want to leave it open so that I can comment all I want, do it, since you're suggesting that my having the last word is somehow an evil intention - not logical of you, is it?
[That went over his head. It's illogical to have never-ending interaction with one who evades the points and just wants bickering to drag others down too.]
Some do use their power to have that mundane last-word. I'm not into it. My last word is the Word, the same that John talked in the open of his Gospel that is completely consistent with the Christian Commons that I love and for which I will give up the flesh.
*ane didn't comprehend what I meant by "not logical of you, is it?" in that paragraph above. My phrasing here required this later inserted explanation because I had been giving *ane more credit for maturity than he deserves. I doubt he'll understand even with this explanation. I don't think he'll care either way.
*ane has tried to inject his Facebook link here as if that is enough. So I clarify concerning my statement about a different venue from this one. What I have said here does not mean that I would go onto another person's personal Facebook area and barrage that person (whether or not with conveniently selective, reframed, out-of-context, pseudo-countervailing statements). Facebook is not *ane's personal blog where he can control. Anyone on Facebook may complain to Facebook. I wouldn't do it anyway, not even on a blog *ane completely controls and where he has sign an agreement in blood allowing it.
Typical for his ilk and him, *ane has completely missed the point. This blog is not a wide-open, free-for-all, anarchic, lawless territory and will not become so. This blog is governed not by hedonism or dismantled rules against willful harm.
My point was one of saying to *ane to visualize others coming onto his site where he is serious but where those others can post endless streams of nonsense. Apparently, he can't do that visualizing or doesn't care.
When I started this blog, I left the setting set at allowing all comments to show up immediately without first being moderated. I was unfamiliar with comment spam and other aspects that confront blog owners/administrators. There are numerous people who do not abide by self-restraint. Over time, I reduced spam to near zero but some additional people behind fascist firewalls were also being blocked. I have since found what seems to be the best balance. Dealing with some spam (the vast majority of which comes from sexual perverts; no surprise there), etc., for the sakes of people who might truly want to hear the ultimate solution is workable. I don't even "see" the spam. I automatically delete it. I don't debate it.
I would not reciprocate regardless. I was not and am not extending reciprocity to *ane whereby I will white list his comments so that anything and everything he would care to post here in the comment section will show up immediately and remain. Why would I not do that? Well, his behavior as documented below shows exactly why. *ane does not know how to conduct himself in this regard. He does not know how to behave himself in another person's home where the rules are designed to lead to the Strait Gate and along the Narrow Way.
Of his own choosing, *ane is a creature of the Wide Way that leads to Hell. He is a proselytizer for it and wants this blog to be his forum and is whining without cause that it isn't. He can't have his hellion way here, so he's going around trashing other areas such as my Facebook "Wall."
For those who are unfamiliar, depending upon user-chosen settings, other Facebook users may post on one's profile page. It would be like allowing *ane to do blog posts here. Can you imagine? I'd have to be insane to allow that.
Now, *ane has a penchant for not grasping what I mean, so let me be completely clear here. I will not be engaging in a wild non-debate (no rules; no conviction of the heart upon hearing the truth) with him under any circumstances. I will not engage him because it is clear that he does not know how properly to behave and react when his assertions are shown wrong. To continue engaging with such a one is fruitless. It is vanity. I'm not interested.
This is all why Jesus said the door will finally shut and not be reopened. One either writes the real law on one's heart and abides therefore or never enters. All the crying and gnashing of teeth won't trick the owner.
You don't stand with me. So be it. Go sell what ever it is. People who buy into what you're selling will be with you or below you since you'll make them twice the son of Hell.
I'm not looking for you, *ane. You're lost, but right now, you make yourself not of the fold. When you hear Jesus, let me know. You'll hear me too then. If you think that's setting up myself as God apart from God, think again. It's what Jesus was selling. I'm buying. I love the right-side up pyramid, leveled. I love the first who is the last and vice versa. I love those who will wash my feet and I whose feet I will wash not as what is the same as mere symbolic lip service but as full members of the Christian Commons that does not belong to me alone in total but to every real, fully committed, honest member, together in total.
May God bless you with the truth if you are able to receive it, *ane. You'll have to stop being a "dog-snake" though. You'll have to transform for real. You'll have to line up 100% with Jesus's words and deeds as the whole body. You have said here though that you don't want it, not because I've said what it is. It is what it is whether I came here or not. I haven't made up anything.
You came here to run down that which came out from Jesus. You came to distort. It didn't work. I'm not falling for the temptation you've attempted to present. I reject it. You aren't God. You aren't with the Jesus I know. You're against what he has said. That's obvious to you too.
Put your complaints about me where I can come comment where everyone can openly associate all you've said here with you. Is that tempting? Why do you fear it? Everyone who fears it (standing in the light out of the dark shadows) fears being exposed for the evil he is doing. Of course, then there are those without shame. That's how it is. That's what Jesus said. All Christians believe it and know it without doubt. How many are there, who are they, and where are they? They aren't with you!
Now, I have other things to do along the same line I've done here, that is furthering the Christian Commons you so loathe but that will be in the Highest without you as you are now. Where you'll be exactly is not for me to say. I just know you won't be with me (not my fault) and you won't be with Jesus based upon his own stated standard whether I get there or not. Some people are "smart" enough to say to others, "I'll see you in Hell." I don't want to live there.
[not sarcasm] If you're wondering if you leave another nothing-comment (dark) what I'll do, I won't bother with it. I'm not interested in spinning my wheels, and that doesn't say that I can't handle what you have to say. It simply means that I've heard you and I heard enough. I don't need to hear the same over again from you for me to be true. The door will close. I have that right given to me from the real God, not Satan.
Peace to all,
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)