I joined the Facebook group, "Solidarity campaign with the Swedish journalist threatened by zionists," and left the following Wall post there:

Mr. Donald Bostrom's report was highly professional and objective. If it had been any other group besides the Zionists, the Zionists would have given him an award.

Also, Matthew Cassel's article on The Electronic Intifada is garbage. He completely dismisses the testimony of those cited by Bostrom. He further completely mischaracterizes Bostrom's report. Bostrom did not accuse. He reported on the long-held suspicions of Palestinians.

What with what went on in New Jersey, is there any wonder why those Palestinians would think that they might just get a bit of a hearing in the press now?

Matthew Cassel needs to take some deep breaths from a paper bag.

The Zionist screaming fits "Me thinks thou protesteth too much." They are absolutely mortified at the prospect of anyone discovering any tangible evidence for the suspicions.

Bostrom did not practice tabloid journalism there. He simply reported what the people said (dozens of them; what they suspect) and not without reason.

  • Subscribe
  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.