1. TWITTER DAILY UPDATE FOR 2010-01-24 #

  2. That does not sound like Osama bin Laden's voice in the video reactionaries claim says al Qaeda planned the so-called underwear bombing. #

  3. Also, the voice does not say al Qaeda planned the so-called underwear bombing. Perhaps the version I heard was truncated. I'm checking. #

  4. "The message I want to convey to you through the plane of the hero Umar Farouk...." That is not necessarily a claim of responsibility. #

  5. "No results found for 'full text of bin Laden'" "No results found for 'full text of Osama'" 24 hrs. Who's false propagandizing? Ans: MSM! #

  6. The only sites right now that even hint at it are auto-redirected to stupid, fake, hard-drive anti-virus scan sites. #

  7. Now one whole news cycle is full of a piece of dung, unsubstantiated talking point from wicked Zionists whose dupes carelessly spread it. #

  8. After the damage is done, cursory minds are on to watching entertainment. If, and, and buts are then given for the sake of MSM credibility. #

  9. @inksnatcher Bush: "The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." in reply to inksnatcher #

  10. "Iran is attempting to reach a deal to secretly import 1,350 tons of purified uranium ore from Kazakhstan." Prove it. #

  11. Manufacturing consent for another illegal, immoral, anti-Christ war against an "Islamic" state for the sake of land-thieving Zionists.... #

  12. Manufacturing consent for another illegal, immoral, anti-Christ war against an "Islamic" state for the sake of greedy capitalists.... #

  13. Some, such as Sean Hannity, claim this truth is "blame America first," a phrase devoid of judgment. He also claims Christianity. #

  14. While Hannity claims Christianity, he calls for war. Does he claim Jesus calls for the kind of bloody wars Hannity wants? Heaven forbid. #

  15. Sean Hannity, should Haitians have killed every American imperialist who ever attempted to step foot on Haitian soil? #

  16. Certainly, the Haitians would have had to fend off the whole imperial military. Whose fault would that have been, Sean? #

  17. Open up your "free markets" to takeovers, corruption of leaders, & privatization & shutdown of your collective enterprises or die. Blame it! #

  18. Not every slave was righteous, but certainly not one of the slavers was while slaving and before repenting and atoning. #

  19. Pat Robertson blames victims. He claims Christianity but ignores his LORD saying the innocent & righteous suffer from the covetous violent. #

  20. The Heritage Foundation, a "free market," imperial, neocon, self-styled think tank, is rubbing its greedy hands together over Haiti. #

  21. Bring the former slaves more so back into the fold of the enslaved is the plan of the Zionist Heritage Foundation – a tool of the banksters. #

  22. There's no freedom in being taken over by violently coercive privatizers. #

  23. Jean Bertrand Aristide was ousted by bloody American imperialists because he wanted the poor Haitians to own their own country. #

  24. Manuel Zelaya was treated to a similar contrived fate. He wanted fairness for the Honduran poor — a sin against the imperial leisure class. #

  25. Mahatma Gandhi was an uppity nigger in the eyes of the unduly lauded, racist Winston Churchill. Gandhi was for the poor. That was his sin. #

  26. Brothers and sisters, Jesus was spiked to the murderous torture contraption called the cross for being for the poor and oppressed. #

  27. Voodoo is not the answer for Haiti, but American covetousness is a plague upon Haiti and the world. Blame it! I do. Repent of it. #

  28. While there is liberalism and then liberalism, Jon Voight doesn't know the right kind of liberalism. He denounces it all now. #

  29. Jon threw the baby out with the bath water. Jon Voight is opposed to coercion so long as it's against what he wants. #

  30. Jon Voight's knowledge of what really happened before the attack on Gaza is almost zero. #

  31. Voight bought the lies of the bloody, terrorist, land-thieving Zionists. Saying that doesn't mean Hamas is saintly either. #

  32. Racism stinks! #

Powered by Twitter Tools


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.