Cover-up: "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Aquino - Wikipedia"

I tried to find any reliable sources for this article on Google, however, having perused all 451 hits for "Michael Aquino" Temple I find not one site which satisifies [sic] Wikipedias [sic] requirements of being a reliable source. I have also looked via Google Books and Google Scholar and nothing immediately springs to my eye as usable in providing a case for keeping this article.

via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Aquino - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Oh really? Try harder.

Obviously, the Wikipedia editors are protecting Michael Aquino, helping to cover up all of his Satanic connections in the Pentagon and elsewhere. There is also the George H. W. Bush White House homosexual-pedophile scandal to cover up. There's the Boy's Town pedophile and the GOP/Franklin pedophile connection to it all. There's Aquino's connection to the Presidio pedophile scandal. The list goes on and on into the CIA and drug experiments and creating assassins, running heroin in the U.S.,...corrupt, violent, greedy, sexually perverted Empire worthy of Caligula and his fate.

The Wikipedia deleted the article four months after I posted the following about Aquino:

In 1984, one US Army lieutenant colonel Michael Aquino, a psychological operations specialist, was being investigated by the military concerning allegations of pedophilia surrounding a daycare center at The Presidio of San Francisco when it was still a US Army post. No charges were brought against Aquino. He was protected by his fellows. Aquino was a member of the Church of Satan but split off as a founder of the Temple of Set (Set referring to the Egyptian god of whom Aquino holds Satan is a derivative). This concept is the opposite of unity and oneness and wholeness as expressed by Jesus.

The Set followers are solipsistic, meaning they hold that the self is the only knowable reality (not self in God and God's self in one but rather the self as willpower apart from God). This stream is heading in the opposite direction of Jesus Christ. It is antichrist. It is the individual human will above all. It leads to the Leopold and Loeb mentality. It is in line with Nietzsche, Machiavelli, Ayn Rand, humanism (the apostate brand), libertarianism (also the apostate brand), militarism, capitalism, etc., which cascades into sociopathy where others are seen as there to do with as the strong please since to evil minds, survival of the fittest is the law and the fittest are those most capable of ruthlessness for selfish aims. Lust can easily be unbridled. Appetites, distorted by abuse, can be hedonistically indulged without compassion. The downward spiral is all rationalized away. These currents never lead to Christlikeness. They never lead to giving and sharing all freely. They always lead to taking for self at the expense of others. They license deception to achieve their aims, which they often claim are ennobling no matter how depraved. It is the hypocritical direction.


Along with retired major general Paul E. Vallely, who has been a senior military analyst for FOX News, Aquino co-authored a paper entitled, From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory. That paper advocated in 1980 much of the mindset that is being projected now by the US military. The basic tenets of the paper include being absolutely convincing that you will outlast any enemy (never quitting) and completely dominating mass media both foreign and domestic including not allowing the home front to hear or see any information coming from the other side. By extension, this leads to terrorizing (if the first stages in the MindWar fail) an enemy into believing in the futility of resistance.

Fascinated by Nazi paganism, Aquino conducted satanic rituals at Nazi SS (Schutzstaffel; defense echelon) chief Heinrich Himmler's Wewelsburg Castle in Bavaria. Aquino wrote about the ritual he conducted at Himmler's castle as follows:

... the Wewelsburg was conceived by Heinrich Himmler to be the "Mittelpunkt der Welt" (Middle of the World), and as the focus of the Hall of the Dead was to be the Gate of that Center, to summon the Powers of Darkness at their most powerful locus.

Are you connecting the dots yet? Perhaps as a propagandist, you knew all of this. Well, others will be reading it for the first time. They'll go out searching using Google, etc. They may run into "The Finders" and the "Franklin Pedophile" case and how it connects directly to the White House and how people "mysteriously" died surrounding the issues and how the FBI and U.S. military combined to cover it all up. Think 9/11 cover-up.

People will remember where they really learned the truth (the whole truth). They'll come back to help bring forth the Christian Commons, which you now hate because its the most unselfish thing anyone out there has even proposed. It's the answer to the food shortages and all the rest of the evil.

Look, if you don't want people following Mohammed, say so from a position of honesty. Argue from a position of righteousness that is consistency. Don't do this stupid CIA, KGB, Mossad excrement. It's the bottomless pit. You're doing the work of minions and dupes for the worldly imperialist plutocrats. You're selling your souls following them. "Wake up America?"; try waking up yourselves. Try reading Jesus.

Honestly, if this is the best Satan can do now, he's really lost his touch. Go tell your bosses, "We've been made. The cover is blown."

Judas infiltrated, but he did God's work while Satan thought he was doing Satan's alone. Read it, and think. Jesus wasn't tricked. Real Christians (the elect) aren't going to fall to this garbage of yours. They will tell each other. They'll be warned. They'll heed.

You don't know what's going on even if you think you do.

Where is the 3.2 trillion dollars that is missing and reported as such immediately before 9/11 by Donald Rumsfeld? All the coverage went on to 9/11.

What's the memory hole?

Who addicted the poor, U.S. inner-city Blacks to crack cocaine? The CIA did under Oliver North under Ronald Reagan. They used the money to fund the terrorist groups and death squads in Central America and elsewhere. Hear that? I said terrorist groups!

Who trained SAVAK in torture and terrorist techniques? The CIA did. SAVAK was the secret police of the dictator of Iran, the Shah. If U.S. idiots hadn't overthrown Mohammed Mosaddeq but had rather helped him, Iran wouldn't be ruled now by semi-sharia. Many other things that happened wouldn't have too.

What you do now creates the future humanity inherits. Are you setting up Hell or Heaven? I'm for being Heaven bound. You're headed for Hell and trying to take as many others with you whom you can fool. You are promoting the devouring spirit, the fracturing spirit, the opposite of the healing, wholesome spirit. You're for coercion and not people freely coming to God. You're advocating evil. You're not working for God. You haven't come in the name of God.

Your site says things about Mohammed's teaching that are correct. You are pushing half-truths. He did teach wrong things; however, you are being hypocritical, because you don't want what is truly best. What Jesus Christ preached is truly best. No one in the history of humanity has ever surpassed his teachings and life example for rightness (or righteousness if you will).

Why not stop being a hypocrite? Why don't you turn to the truth, repent of all your selfish feelings, thoughts, words, and deeds, and then truly atone to the best of your ability? Why don't you just become a real Christian? Give up all the greed, violence, and sexual depravity. Don't point to the beam in Mohammed's eye while you still have beams in your own. Preach and do consistency with your all, then warn others away from error. Also, don't be coercive, since you wouldn't truly turn via such means either. You have to choose without being forced, or you really won't have it in your heart.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
    • Robert Valko

      I hear ya