Open Interrogatories and Requests for Documentation to Daniel Domscheit-Berg of OpenLeaks Concerning Accusations of Zionist-Bribery Against Julian Assange and WikiLeaks


Before I begin, let me state here that there may or may not be investigative journalists engaged in this same effort at this time. I am unaware of any. I hope this article will be the impetus for, or a further impetus for, someone or many putting blunt and direct questions to Daniel Domscheit-Berg and others concerning the following matter.

Exercising Freedom of the Press

(Yes, in spite of U.S. Senator Joseph Lieberman's obvious desire to the contrary, the Real Liberal Christian Church blog is covered under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution):


I don't believe it's necessary to introduce Julian Assange or WikiLeaks to readers. They've both been the top story in global news on and off again for years now.

The Cablegate Cables are now quite famous. WikiLeaks has slowly been releasing U.S. State Department cables. They reportedly range from Secret (which is below Top Secret) down to Unclassified and even below Confidential (in other words, down to the level where the State Department really doesn't care if the content is openly published).

Quickly: Anti-Zionism Versus Anti-Semitism

So far, none of the cables has revealed a smoking gun to the world that comes even remotely close to satisfying the hardest core anti-Zionists who often verge over into the ethnically bigoted zone generically termed anti-Jewish and often incorrectly labeled anti-Semitic (Arabs, for example, are Semites).

I could infinitely split the hair here but won't. Let me simply point out that Jewishness has been rendered a relatively fluid term. I have used the word "ethnically" above so that I'm being clear that I'm referring to ethnic bigotry in the same vain we refer to racism. I oppose the idea that the "Biological Jew," the genetic descendant of Judah the son of Jacob (the immediate son of Isaac, in turn, the immediate son of Abraham), is necessarily beyond redemption and should be wiped from the face of the Earth to help save the world.

Case in point: Mary, the mother of Jesus, is a direct descendant of Judah, a daughter of Jacob (albeit many generations separated). The term "Jew," while debated as to it's origin, to me, ethnically means a direct biological descendant of Jacob in the most commonly used sense of the term "biological." Therefore Jesus too was a son of Judah. To be bigoted against all descendants of Judah is to say that Jesus was evil. Where is the evidence for that? On the contrary, Jesus, as he is characterized in the Gospels, is the most righteous person in recorded history to date.

It is certainly a sin to lump all Jews together and mark them for extermination. It is required to take each soul one at a time. (Even then, as a Christian, I stand opposed to human kind deciding who is and who is not beyond redemption and fit for execution, which in the mundane is understood as final. The theology for this position is deep and for the sake of manageability, beyond the scope of this article.)

More Background

The reason(s) why the Cablegate Cables have not provided the smoking gun that the anti-Zionists desire to have revealed has been ripe for speculation, including wild speculation. I have no problem with people wondering and even publicly raising suspicions and calling for more transparency concerning the matter. What I adamantly object to is coming to final, condemnatory conclusions based upon extremely weak and unsubstantiated allegations to date and at the same time hedging on it. It's an easy trap into which to fall. I've made the mistake myself and caution everyone to help everyone else to avoid the pitfall and further, to pull one another out of the error.

To nearly exhaustively round out the background here, I direct you to an earlier article of mine that I suggest you read if you haven't already: Julian Assange: Proven Zionist, Israeli, Mossad Agent? Prove It.

So, to "cut to the chase," as so many Americans like to say, the following constitutes direct, pointed, blunt, and frank questions and requests for information/documentation:

To Daniel Domscheit-Berg (and OpenLeaks)

Interrogatories and Requests for Documentation

  1. Did Leah Abramowitz of Syria Truth (National Council for truth, justice and reconciliation in Syria SYNATIC; ) conduct an email interview with you?
  2. Are you aware of articles that have been written and published that are based upon that interview?
  3. Do you agree with the way in which your statements were characterized in the Syria Truth interview?
  4. Do you have tangible evidence that Julian Assange took bribe money from Zionists in exchange for agreeing not to release cables damaging to Zionism?
  5. If you do, please forward that evidence to me or release it openly on the Internet and publish the link and inform me of such.
  6. If you don't agree with the choice of words in that question, how would you characterize any such money transaction and/or agreement or understanding?
  7. Who else knew about the bribe and agreement?
  8. Did you raise the issue of the bribe and agreement with Julian Assange?
  9. Did you do that openly within the WikiLeaks community so that any insider who wanted to could see the exchange?
  10. Do you have a transcript of that exchange?
  11. Will you provide that transcript to the world?
  12. If not, why not?
  13. If you do not have tangible evidence of bribery or an agreement, did you ever actually see or hear any such evidence? If so, describe it and the circumstances in as much detail as you are able.
  14. If you never saw or heard any such evidence, upon what have the accusations been based?
  15. Are you a Zionist?
  16. Are you Jewish?
  17. If so, please explain {religious (practicing; type, i.e. Reformed, etc.), ethnic, or any other way you'd care to express your Jewishness, if any}.
  18. Is Julian Assange a Zionist?
  19. Is WikiLeaks a Zionist organization?
  20. To the best of your understanding, what do you consider are Julian Assange's views concerning the Zionist-Israeli occupation of Palestine?
  21. What are your views on that issue/conflict?
  22. Also to the best of your understanding, what do you consider are Julian Assange's views concerning the most recent Israeli war against Lebanon and concerning Operation Cast Lead against the Gazans?
  23. What are your views on that war and operation?
  24. Was there a general consensus within WikiLeaks concerning Zionism, the war against Lebanon, Operation Cast Lead, the current blockade of Gaza, and the like?
  25. If so, describe it to the best of your ability.
  26. If not, describe the points of contention and add or qualify to your hearts desire.
  27. To the best of your understanding, what do you consider are Julian Assange's views concerning the on-going geopolitical struggle over the alleged Iranian Nuclear Weapons Program?
  28. What are your views on that issue?
  29. Describe the WikiLeaks Community's view concerning Iran.
  30. To the best of your understanding, are Julian Assange, WikiLeaks, or your OpenLeaks () group in favor at this point (where hard evidence against Iran has not been forthcoming) of preemptively attacking Iran to prevent the possibility of Iran developing nuclear weapons?
  31. Are you in favor at this point of preemptively attacking Iran to prevent the possibility of Iran developing nuclear weapons?
  32. What is your best understanding of Julian Assange's view of Islam?
  33. Is Julian Assange against the Iranian theocracy?
  34. If so, is that primarily due to the Iranian leaderships' open opposition to homosexuality?
  35. What is the WikiLeaks Community's position on Iran and homosexuality?
  36. What is your position on Iran and homosexuality?
  37. If that issue is not central to Julian, WikiLeaks, or to you, please explain in as much detail as you want exactly what you find objectionable about the Iranian government, if anything. Discuss anything you want the public to know: Equal rights for women, the death penalty, sharia, one-party dictatorship, etc.
  38. To the best of your understanding, what are Julian Assange's, the WikiLeaks Community's, and your OpenLeaks group's views concerning 9/11? This is a huge point of contention with those who suspect Zionist bribery of Julian Assange. A number of rather public figures have come out for 9/11 Truth (a new, but this time, exhaustive investigation into 9/11), Andrew Napolitano of the FOX News network being perhaps the most "mainstream corporate media" proponent of the 9/11 Truth Movement.
  39. If 9/11 leaks were to reach OpenLeaks, would you release them?
  40. Would you handle it any differently from any other leaked material?
  41. If so, in what way?
  42. Have you visited and overviewed the materials available at Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth?
  43. If not, why not?
  44. To the best of your understanding, would Julian Assange leak 9/11 leaks?

At this point, I feel that these questions and requests for documentation/information are enough to get started. There are endless questions that could be asked. I have not pondered long over potential questions but rather woke up this morning and before rising from bed, I simply determined to put it to Daniel Domscheit-Berg. I considered a few questions to start with but immediately sat down at the computer and hammered out the ones above.

Time is of the Essence

There's a lynch mob ready to crucify Julian Assange without any due process or trial other than a kangaroo court of public opinion manufactured by publishers and others who have been nothing short of reckless.

For the Record

I don't agree with Julian Assange on many fronts. I disagree with his attitude about multiple sexual partners. I disagree with his pro so-called just-war stance. I disagree with his decision to not block non-public names and to also only release some cables and to release those only to a select group of publishers. I disagree with his dismissive attitude toward the 9/11 Truth Movement.

To state it the other way, had I been in the business of publishing whistleblower leaks in WikiLeaks' shoes, I would have done the following:

  • Removed the names of all non-public figures
  • Released all the documents at once or as soon as the names had been blocked out
  • Released the documents to the whole world at the same time through a number of channels including on the open WikiLeaks site with all the mirrors I could have arranged in advance
  • Stated clearly and plainly that there will be no favoritism (Let the facts and truth speak for themselves/itself)

Of course, I would have editorialized. I would though not have played favorites with anyone concerning anything regardless of donations, meaning that bribes would be out of the question. No one would get to buy the suppression of evidence of sin.

Naturally, everything I've written on the Real Liberal Christian Church website would pertain.

I say all of this at the supposed risk of informing the enemy Empire of too much. I don't fear it.

However, I'm not in that business, per se. I'm for leaks and whistleblowing where the leaker/whistleblower(s) have done their best to adhere to Jesus's admonition as follows and how it can be (I do and here) applied to the secular realm and other realms:

And if thy brother sin against thee, go, show him his fault between thee and him alone: if he hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother. But if he hear thee not, take with thee one or two more, that at the mouth of two witnesses or three every word may be established. And if he refuse to hear them, tell it unto the church: and if he refuse to hear the church also, let him be unto thee as the Gentile and the publican. (Matthew 18:15-17 ASV)

There are some who upon even attempting to begin this process, will simply be hacked to death. For me, where in all other things they are striving in earnest to be Christians, their souls are taken into Heaven. Receive it as you are able.

Share and Repost, etc.

Lastly, I give everyone leave to repost this article in its entirety. Please do it. Feel free to use parts of this article also. Give clear attribution (supply clear links, etc.; name the Real Liberal Christian Church and me, Tom Usher) definitely not for my ego's sake but for continuity's sake. Thank you.

The truth really will set us free.

  • Subscribe
  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in WikiLeaks. Bookmark the permalink.