Hogwash: "American Thinker: Obama under the Glare of WikiLeaks"

Did you know the following:

Israel has demonstrated a dedication to statehood for Arab-Palestinians, as evidenced by its active involvement in the development of viable infrastructure, agricultural capabilities, and a variety of civic projects....

via American Thinker: Obama under the Glare of WikiLeaks.

I didn't know it either, and I still don't. Concerning Palestine, Israel destroys much more than it constructs. Who doesn't know that?

Did you know the following:

WikiLeaks also proved that previously discounted reports by Israelis that Islamic terrorists were using ambulances to commit terrorist acts during the 2006 war were, in fact, true. Iran actually used the Red Crescent to ship weapons and terrorists into Lebanon to infiltrate Iraq.

I didn't either, and I still don't. What I know is that the employees toeing the Party Line simply make the allegations.

This linked article characterizes everything as if Israel smells like a rose.

Did you know the following:

When Honduran leader Manuel Zelaya attempted to illegally and unilaterally override his country's constitution and serve another presidential term, Obama was fully aware that Zelaya posed a threat to democracy. The WikiLeaks cables indicated that Obama backed Zelaya in order to please Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chávez.

No, you didn't know it and you don't know it now because it's total bull. Everyone who has looked into it much at all knows full-well that Manuel Zelaya did nothing more than seek to conduct a non-binding survey to see whether the people, the voters, the general population of Honduras rather than the elitists, would like to see the Constitution reworked to make it fairer. We know Zelaya would have been out of office by then anyway.

Contrary to this stupid linked article, we actually know that Hillary Clinton and the State Department knew it was an illegal coup and should have moved to end all military ties and support for the military that carried out the coup. Of course, it's worth noting that Zionists have property in Honduras.

Did you know the following:

U.S. military troops uncovered the existence of said weapons [WMD] in Saddam's Iraq, including 550 metric tons of yellowcake and chemical weapons labs.

Again, I didn't either, and I still don't. Zero proof of this has been given. This is just a continuation of the endless stream of lies in the lead up to the invasion and occupation. If this American Thinker (thinkers can be stupid false propagandists) site has any proof, show it. Where's your proof, liars? If there were any proof of this, it would have been the top headline everywhere for days. By the way, yellowcake isn't considered a weapon of mass destruction. Yellowcake is not refined even enough to generate electrical power in any meaningful way as currently done in the world today.

This article takes the cables as Gospel revelations. Only idiots do that.

This linked article is just as stupid as the anti-Zionist writings about WikiLeaks by Gordon Duff of Veterans Today.

If you supply proof, I'll retract my statements concerning the particular point and issue a public apology right on this blog and in this post via an update; otherwise, you're all wet.



The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in WikiLeaks. Bookmark the permalink.