WHO'S THE WILD ANIMAL: PALESTINIAN-ARAB MUSLIMS OR FALSE-ZIONIST-PROJECT ZEALOTS?
Something like a cage has to be built for them. I know that sounds terrible. It is really cruel. But there is no choice. There is a wild animal there that has to be locked up in one way or another.
That's someone talking about all the Palestinians. That's someone trying to convince the American people. That's someone talking about three-year-old little kids. He's saying there is no choice. You know what? To Hell with that!
The Palestinians are not wild animals. They never have been. I'm a Christian. I don't massage my words about Mohammed for the sake of political correctness that isn't correct but a flat out lie. Mohammed was one who led raiding caravans and took the spoils and slaves. I don't hold with that kind of behavior. In my book, it's criminal. Well, I also hold that horning into where others are living and then horning them out is no better, and that's exactly what the lying, thieving Zionist Project was and remains all about.
Let me tell you that the Palestinian people, even though they are mostly Muslims, would accept me because they know full well that I don't consider them animals fit for a big cage so I can steal the land out from under them or for any other reason. I believe in treating the Muslims as I would want to, ought to want to be treated by them. I love their children. They are I (me) when I was young. They need protection from fascists. Sure, there would be some who'd have a difficult time facing the logic about the clear difference between the teachings of Jesus Christ and Mohammed, but they'd talk about it rather than just kill me unless the stupid likes of the false-Zionist cause nothing but wrath throughout all the hearts of all the Palestinians.
Well, they haven't succeeded in doing that yet in spite of the fact that they've been trying for decade after decade after decade. If anything, they've proven that the Palestinians in general are vastly more civilized than were the terrorist founders of the Zionist Project in Israel. How those people have retained the composure they've shown is remarkable.
Who called for the Palestinians to be caged up as wild animals like that? What else has he said?
The whole Zionist project is apocalyptic. It exists within hostile surroundings and in a certain sense its existence is unreasonable. It wasn't reasonable for it to succeed in 1881 and it wasn't reasonable for it to succeed in 1948 and it's not reasonable that it will succeed now. Nevertheless, it has come this far. In a certain way it is miraculous. I live the events of 1948, and 1948 projects itself on what could happen here. Yes, I think of Armageddon. It's possible. Within the next 20 years there could be an atomic war here.
That's right. It was and is unreasonable. It was and is flat out wrong that any people horned into Palestine after WWII and were supported by any other people. It can never be made right. There is only one right path for the Jews in Israel and that's national repentance and atonement. It's the only right path for the entire human race. We need universal repentance and atonement.
All the greed, covetousness, violence, weapons making and sales, depravity, death, destruction needs to end or those having those desires and carrying out the evils need to be cut off and burned up in exactly the manner and for exactly the reasons Jesus Christ said.
The choice is becoming as stark as it can be made. That means we are closer to the time of reckoning. People can move back from that by doing the right things. People can escape by doing the right things, which means for the right reasons. You can't do the entirely right thing for any amount of wrong reason.
Once the choice is so clear that no one has an excuse, once the choice is put out there and everyone has a clear and plain opportunity to make the right decision, if humanity keeps choosing wrong, it will be divided and the evil ones will be cut off and burned up by forces beyond the control and power of mere mortal human beings.
Who was who said those things in trying to get the Americans to support evil? It was the Israeli historian, propagandists, false-Zionist, Benny Morris. (See: "Benny Morris Justifies Israel's Coming Attack on Iran," David Bromwich. The Huffington Post. July 18, 2008.)
He's trying to scare the Americans into going along with Israel in attacking Iran. As I said above, to Hell with that!
Those who live by the sword in this will die by the sword. If Benny Morris thinks he's going to get real Christians to back his false-Zionist Project, he's totally wrong. Real Christians know that there will be separation. It will be the warmongers from the total peacemakers. Real Christians will have no part in Israel's wicked war making.
War is evil, always. There are no excuses. It is better to die in the flesh than it is to take life to prolong this fleshly life. Those who save their fleshly lives will lose the real life. Those who die in this flesh for the sake of everything (truth, righteousness, unselfishness) for which Jesus Christ stood, spoke, and demonstrated will be saved for the real life. They do the right thing because it is right, even when it means being persecuted for it, as was Jesus Christ whom the likes of Benny Morris murdered and made excuses and told lies about it before, during, and ever since.
- Technorati Tags: 1881, 1948, American, apocalyptic, Arabs, Armageddon, atomic war, atonement, Benny Morris, Bible, Christian, Christianity, civilized, covetousness, criminal, culture, current affairs, current events, David Bromwich, death, depravity, destruction, fascists, founders, God, greed, Hell, Huffington Post, huffingtonpost.com, Iran, Islam, Israel, Israeli historian, Jesus, Jesus Christ, Jews, lie, lying, media, Mohammed, Muslims, news, nuclear war, Palestine, Palestinians, peacemakers, philosophy, political correctness, politics, propagandists, raiding caravans, religion, repentance, righteousness, science, slaves, society, spirituality, spoils, technology, terrorist, theology, thieving, Tom Usher, truth, unselfishness, violence, warmongers, weapons, wild animal, wild animals, wrath, WWII, zealots, Zionist Project
Tom Usher
Standing Comment, all posts and pages:
To all homosexuals and their supporters, condoners, promoters, accepters, confirmers, and the like:
Unless you have something completely new that hasn't already been refuted, don't bother. It won't show up.
Rehashing what has already been refuted is a waste of everyone's time.
I'm not interested in casting pearls before swine, giving the children's bread to the dogs, or rebuking a forever scorner.
Learn or go away: There is zero wisdom in homosexuality. Homosexuality is wrong. Nothing any homosexual or anyone else can say or do will alter it. No one needs the Bible to know it either. It's prima facie. There's no such thing as an unrepentant-homosexual Christian. There never has been and never will be. That's the way of it. If you don't like it, change.
Do site searches on the various topics concerning homosexuality to determine if your "point" has already been handled. Currently, I provide three different search methods. The "WordPress" search is still the most thorough.
The same can be done regarding militarism, capitalism, coercion, and many other main issues and themes.
TREATMENT, RUDENESS, POLITENESS, OFFENSE, TRUTH
Many times over the course of this website's existence, I've had commentators complain about how I've treated them and/or others. Much less frequently has anyone taken exception to those commentator's comments. I assume that's because for one, I appear to be holding my own.
Often, I have raised the fact that Jesus called certain people "serpents." I've often also mentioned how he cleaned the temple with whip in hand, not that he used it on anyone. It certainly doesn't say that he did, and neither was he charged with it in the kangaroo court of the serpents who ended up murdering him by proxy just for, among other wonderful things, speaking out and speaking truth.
If I say that those who are engaged in serpentine behavior are the New Testament "serpents," then why take offense at my saying it rather than standing with Jesus and me about it?
If others don't like it that I treat others or them the way I have in this regard, why don't they take it up with the serpents and/or their own consciences and God?
If I wanted to catch flies, I'd use honey. I don't want flies on this level. Human beings aren't to be on the level of flies. If the truth is bitter as vinegar, then ask yourself why and learn to taste it as sweet but not sickeningly so. Why attack the message and messenger, as the serpents did, and become a serpent by so doing?
The issue is not "name calling" on some bratty, childish level. When Jesus said "serpents," he was not being as a brat. His level was completely adult to adults and children. He dared say that the children understood the clear and plain truth before the adults who, afterall, had been abused and socialized by the serpents. He still calls adults back. Those who hear him and know his voice (truth) turn around and do the other required things together as well.
What is it for a human being to be more serpentine or reptilian than what God initially gave? What was and remains Jesus's point? What is the reptilian brain versus the vastly higher human brain with its cerebral cortex and frontal and temporal lobes and specific areas of altruistic sentiments and abilities? What are those higher areas before they are damaged, before the communication pathways to them and between them are diminished by evil that is always some form of abuse? How are those pathways reestablished or created where they never were in this fleshly life?
The snake lays its eggs. The eggs hatch. The snake parent doesn't nurture or raise the offspring. It's every snake for itself. Human parents and family are not designed to be that way. Humans hand down the learning of nurturing. Many people get better training than do others, and many people have a greater aptitude for learning and predisposition for the higher and highest virtues. Many are less abused. People can change for the better and best though, no matter where the starting point. They only can't if they don't — if they reject it.
Snakes, of course, also come in venomous varieties and in strangling varieties, etc., such that they have been attackers and even devourers of humans for eons, guilty and innocent alike.
Now, Jesus knew that most people could relate to what were, and still are, largely considered "good" parenting skills and "good" "family" relations. He regularly used those concepts to get people to consider the wider implications for the whole of humanity. He did know that many would refuse. He let them go. He didn't demand secular or false-religion legislation to rein them in with threats of violence and imprisonment. He was not and is not coercive. Even his Church is a voluntary place to be.
What he still teaches (through the written words in the New Testament and as those connect with the Old and also teaches through the Holy Spirit he definitely sent as he said he would) is, among many other things, that "good" is vastly better than has been commonly accepted and that real "family" is everyone left after all the rest have rejected the higher and highest good. He raised the standards far above the Old Testament and far above the "modern" standard.
The American Empire and the American people in general aren't even touching the hem of his garment, let alone even attempting to stand upright and side-by-side with him.
I point out that Jesus was, and is, a Real Liberal Christian. He is the one who brought back this censored truth that is the light. After he had spoken it and lived it and was murdered for doing so, the censors set about to re-censor it and did. They couldn't put it out though — couldn't completely extinguish the truth. I wouldn't be saying it now again with all credit to God, just as Jesus, if they had been able to completely block it.
I point out that each of those terms ("real," "liberal," and "Christian," along with "Church") are actually redundant terms — synonyms that are so close that they become one. The term "liberal" here is not the common usage, which common usage is a deliberate corruption of the term. There is no harm in real liberalism. There is no vileness in it. There is only beneficence. "Real" may be understood as the opposite of false-hearted, dark side, and dead of the Holy Spirit. Christian is both real and liberal in those senses. To arrive at living, doing, being those full senses requires what Jesus lives, does, and is in the highest. Finally, the Church is the whole.
Who are they who want to drag it down, censor it, work against it, lessen it, ignore it, etc.? Well, who sides with Jesus and who sides against him? Did the serpents side with him then? Do they now?
We call war-mongers "hawks." We call "peacemakers" blessed and "doves." Why do the hawks not take offense at "hawks" but do take offense at "serpents"? "Hawks" is not yet as telling to the general public, but I must tell you that all hawks are serpents. Why do some say, "Greed is good" but take offense at "serpents"? I tell you there is no difference between the selfish and the serpents. Why do people take offense at serpents when they do not take offense at homosexuality? I tell you the homosexual spirit also comes out from the dark side. It is a choice. It is harmful. Many are abused with it. Many never overcome it. Their very brain matter is transformed by it. Then they claim it is good when it remains confusion and definitely wrong and harmful.
Many arguments were put forth in support of tolerance. I understood that Jesus "tolerated," as in he did not execute wrath but rather told the truth and let the blind follow the blind (blind to the truth) into the ditch of their own making. I have watched while the movement has been corrupted into condoning what was once only to be tolerated. I have watched further while it has moved from condoning to promoting even to the youngest children to get to them before the truth does. I have seen evil at work, and I sound the alarm. I face censorship and other negative reactions for it.
As the American Empire claims to be a light to the world, it murders innocent babies by Hellfire missiles fired from predator drones controlled by armchair, video-gaming serpents in uniform. It tortures those who are not even suspects. It spies on its own without even probable cause or reasonable suspicion. It lies its way into wars for spoils and control. It neglects its poor, whom it treads down for the sakes of the superrich — for the sake of the massive flow of mammon from the bottom up (no trickledown — trickledown is a farce and always has been). All is claimed to be okay in America though — that America is headed in the right direction — because soon, even "don't tell, don't ask" will be a thing of the quaint past and homosexuals may be able to sleep together and have sex in the barracks with the "blessing" of the Empire while they practice murdering the innocent for the sake of homosexual, greedy plutocrats who own them and who, in turn, are owned by the dark-side spirit named by God and Jesus as Satan.
Whose side are you on? I speak truth to warn. I don't tell the secular government what to do other than occasionally to say what at least would be less hypocritical within their fallen, unenlightened system. I do so for spiritual reasons. What I want is the Christian Commons.
Now, if you submit a comment:
What you write here against the Real Liberal Christian Church founded by Jesus Christ will mark you in the Biblical sense unless you show that you have turned and are repenting in time to escape the damnation of your own choosing. That's the way of it. Don't be tempted by the devil to stand opposed to the call of righteousness. Overcome such evil temptation. Help others to help yet others to come to righteous behavior through-and-through.
Check out how even after reading this, people will still take it out of context and twist it to an evil end.