AMAZING JEWS PROTESTING WORLD ZIONIST ORGANIZATION IN NEW YORK

Navigation:
• Newer: EVERYONE AT THE TOP IN HELL (BOTTOM IN THE NEW HEAVEN) KNOWS IT IS A DEPRESSION AND WORSE: INVEST YOUR HEART, MIND, SOUL, AND ALL YOUR STRENGTH IN THE MAMMONLESS SYSTEM OF THE NEW HEAVEN: THE CHRISTIAN COMMONS »
• Older: « NO BANKING, CARMACK AND STILL, OBAMA EVIL STATE-SECRETS, BILDERBERG GROUP, NEW-DEAL WORKS, APARTHEID ISRAEL, YISRAEL BEITEINU, FASCIST AVIGDOR LIEBERMAN, TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION, AND PATRICK LEAHY DOUBLE-STANDARD
• BLOG: Most Recent
• The Christian Commons Project™

28 Comments on “AMAZING JEWS PROTESTING WORLD ZIONIST ORGANIZATION IN NEW YORK”:

1. John Farnham
   Sunday, February 15, 2009 @ 9:09:41 PM (Pacific Time)
   
   

   It would seem likely the Reich will continue to grow
   http://www.palestinechronicle......p?id=14829

   
   
   
2. Tom Usher
   Monday, February 16, 2009 @ 3:14:18 AM (Pacific Time)
   
   

   Hi John,

   Thanks for not being offended at my asking for real first and last names. It has helped.

   The linked article states, "...inevitably find itself [Israel] in confrontation with the United States and in worldwide isolation." That is absolutely correct. I've written that here now several times. However, it applies to option 2 in the article as well, where Tzipi Livni joins Netanyahu.

   Uri Avnery, the author, is somewhat dreaming. Livni is no where near centrist in the whole worldly sense. She's hardline. She may appear centrist by Israeli standards, but she has many fascist bones. She's Mossad through and through. Avnery is correct that Israel has shifted to fascism, but he way understates it.

   Israel is risking it all on Netanyahu-types. The Meir Kahane was an out-and-out racist, and Netanyahu has many similar positions. To Avnery's credit, he does though point out that young, Ashkenazi Israelis are becoming more and more brazen, obnoxious, violent nationalists (Nazi-like).

   Here's what's happening. Much of Israel's youth is very insular and egotistical. They have an extremely exaggerated view of their own and Israel's power. They mostly don't understand how quickly the rest of the world will stop buying into fascist excuses.

   Much of the world is getting its news from much less censored sources. The fascists of the Zionists will move to shut that down, but the world is too fractured now for the old methods to work.

   The world is going to have to come to grips with the fact that Israel's creation was illegitimate. Most national territories have similar histories of illegitimacy to some degree.

   The problem with Israel though is that it was formed after WWII and out of no small sense of sympathy from the rest of the world.

   Because so many Jews went through what they did, the rest of the world rightly expects Jews not to act out as the abused-become-abusers but rather to be the abused who overcame and turned to softheartedness, as the two women mentioned in the post above. Netanyahu and the others simply have no excuses. WWII was too stark for that. The world admitted that it became more enlightened on the heels of the darkness that was WWII and its lead-up. Netanyahu is trying to buck that right along with Rush Limbaugh and his misguided ilk.

   The hardhearted, such as the assassinated Meir Kahane and now Benjamin Netanyahu, again, are going to get many innocent Jews killed when the world becomes fed up with the abused-become-abusers.

   Hitler didn't sort the guilty from the innocent. He hated them all. There are many Jews in Israel who don't care that there are innocent Arabs. They hate them all. People such as Hitler and those racists and ethnically bigoted Jews end up facing the wrath they didn't overcome within.

   It isn't just the Third Reich only this time by the fascist in the Zionist Project. It's actually Hell.

   You see, there is none of Jesus's message in their Judaism or fake Zionism. They have no pacifist root. There are pacifist Jews; but they aren't religious Jews in the sense accepted by the Zionists state, and they can't bring themselves to accept all the rest of the consistent message of harmlessness. They have to have their free-love libertarianism and their mammon worship. There are though pacifist Jews who are real Christians. In fact they are the only real Jews and real Christians. It's what John (your namesake; God has graced) meant.

   Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee. (Revelation 3:9 KJVR)

   Bless you, John. Keep seeking.

   Tom

   
   
   
3. Alan Hamer
   Sunday, May 17, 2009 @ 4:35:48 AM (Pacific Time)
   
   

   Hi every one this is my first post and my first time hear I do like the postings.

   Regards: Alan H from Oz

   
   
   
4. Tom Usher
   Sunday, May 17, 2009 @ 3:40:16 PM (Pacific Time)
   
   

   Thank you, Alan.

   
   
   
5. Alan Hamer
   Sunday, May 17, 2009 @ 8:11:53 PM (Pacific Time)
   
   

   Hello TOM

   Hoops as you can see all ready see I am very new to to all this however
   I do spend some time searching and digging
   for real news I have a
   reading and wrighting
   problem called dislexia?
   for me I do not see written works like I
   should so please excuse
   my poor selling. I do
   have some information that
   I would like to share
   I was wondering could I send it to you if you felt it is Ok or Edit
   it ...

   Kind Regards Alan H

   
   
   
6. Tom Usher
   Sunday, May 17, 2009 @ 8:52:27 PM (Pacific Time)
   
   

   Well, Alan, go ahead and post your comments using the comment-submission method regardless of your spelling. We all make spelling and grammatical errors, typos, etc. My work is loaded with them. I have no editor proof reading before I post here or elsewhere.

   Peace

   
   
   
7. Alan Hamer
   Monday, May 18, 2009 @ 10:29:29 PM (Pacific Time)
   
   

   Hi again Tom

   Thank you for your kind comments Cheers.

   Is it ok to also put links to web sites and
   clips from say Youtube??

   Regards Alan H

   
   
   
8. Tom Usher
   Tuesday, May 19, 2009 @ 12:11:29 AM (Pacific Time)
   
   

   Hello Again, Alan,

   Well, it would depend upon just how much material you have in mind. You can always start a blog of your own and link to your post from comments here and from other blogs in their comment sections. In addition, if there are long forum posts around or comments you've left on other sites, you could link to those as well to save on posting-size here.

   I allow links in comments. 2 or 3 isn't unreasonable, provided they are germane. I've become more particular over time. There are comment posts on this site and links that I would not now approve.

   As for video clips, if you mean embedding them, I would prefer not for reasons of potentially breaking the theme.

   I think you want to have some assurances that if you do the work, I won't just say no once I see the content. I can't give you that. What you can do is just begin commenting with moderately sized comments. If the first is unacceptable, I'll let you know why.

   Before you begin though, be sure you've looked around this site enough to make sure you're posting on the right blog. If you post things that I'll allow but with which I don't agree, I will be very frank. I don't believe in masking the truth behind false politeness. Politeness is great so long as the truth is engrained within it. A "polite" devil is still from, and returning, to Hell.

   Have you read the Comment Rules?

   Peace and Truth,

   Tom Usher

   
   
   
9. Alan Hamer
   Tuesday, May 19, 2009 @ 12:31:03 AM (Pacific Time)
   
   

   Hi Tom please

   Google 4647773

   then:5242820

   then: 5676977

   then; 3168

   
   
   
10. Alan Hamer
    Tuesday, May 19, 2009 @ 1:13:14 AM (Pacific Time)
    
    

    Hi Tom ok Google numbers
    needs to be in a different post sorry

    Lets see how we go with this one I came acrross

    Richard Koshimiza some time ago while I was looking into who are
    the Zionist that seem to be controling America

    WORLD ZIONIST yes is interesting plus there are other group as you may know like Stealth Jews

    Bohemian Jews majority (over 50%) of Jews in Poland descend from German, Moravian, and Bohemian Jews,

    Yemenite Jews :As a result, the plight of Yemenite Jews went unrecognized by the outside ... As a result, some Yemenite Jews abandoned their faith and converted to Islam. ...

    khazaria Jews This kingdom, called Khazaria, was one of the most interesting and influential countries of the medieval world, wielding great power over economic might

    Sephardic Jews;A list of notable Jews of Sephardic ancestry: ... cultural historian, art critic , curator (Sephardic Mother ;father non-Sephardic Jew

    A Stealth Jew : - A Jewish person who due to genetic variables or intermarriage is often mistaken for a Christian person. Usually are a lier...Hilary Clinton come's to mind

    Zionist Jews is an international political movement that originally supported the reestablishment of a homeland for the Jewish People in Palestine

    Japan 's Mr Richard Koshimiza goes for about a hour so you may need to
    save it for a rainy day I have read some of the e-mails he reckons
    he has received if true he is not the flavour of the month....

    You might need to copy and paste this to get it to work
    it is a worth while and interesting

    http://www.youtube.co........

    The clip is not anti Jewish but at first could seem that way
    but points out how controls things

    Regards Truthseeker

    Alan H

    
    
    
11. Tom Usher
    Tuesday, May 19, 2009 @ 1:53:45 AM (Pacific Time)
    
    

    Hi Al,

    It has been a very long day, it's very late here, and I do need to take a shower and get some sleep.

    The comment rules are indicated as follows:
    Please Comment:
    Comment Rules Update: Effective Thursday, April 2, 2009, 03:21 PM Pacific Time: +/-

    Just click on the + sign not in this comment but above the comment section.

    As for your comment, the numbers are to what, videos? You need to supply the URL's for visitors.

    Peace,
    Tom Usher

    
    
    
12. Tom Usher
    Tuesday, May 19, 2009 @ 8:20:57 PM (Pacific Time)
    
    

    Hello Again, Al,

    Richard Koshimizu is the name. That's with a "u" on the end rather than an "a." He's a 9-11 Truther, as am I. However, he's rightfully accused of being a holocaust denier. I am not a holocaust denier. I do though subscribe to the truth that certain (repeat: certain; meaning not all) Jews have misused and abused the sympathy of most concerning WWII to gain unfair advantage over others, such as the Palestinians. I do know there are racists Jews. There's no doubt about it! I've documented it on this site.

    The URL you left is incomplete: "http://www.youtube.co…"

    Perhaps you could get someone on your end to proof your work before you submit it.

    Peace,

    Tom

    
    
    
13. Alan Hamer
    Wednesday, May 20, 2009 @ 9:44:24 PM (Pacific Time)
    
    

    Hi again Tom

    Ok that one worked fine
    must of done somthing
    wrong again.

    Just wondering
    Did you Google the Numbers ?

    I did test the video
    clip before I posted it
    It worked fine down hear

    Yes 9/11 was a inside
    job along with several
    others like UK train
    bombing and our Bali
    Bombing,& Packistan
    the list goes on and on.
    And the evidance is there for any to see.

    Your link to
    Richard
    Koshimizu being a

    /////////////////

    Holocaust denier establishes party in Japan

    Richard Koshimizu claims no Jews were murdered during World War II, and that Hitler was funded and protected by Jews. Anti-Semite political activist to deliver public speech at State-funded venue this week

    ///////////////////

    I have been to his site
    several times as his information regarding
    some 9/11 issues I was not able to work out His site proved to be helpfull.

    Yes when I first saw
    his site I thought he
    could be anti Jewish

    But he is anti
    Zionist and he names names I can understand
    maybe why his name could be tarnished
    He makes it clear he
    is not Anti Jewish
    but states he is Anti
    Zionist

    Yes I agree history
    proves there was a
    But I think to a large
    degree the the Zionist
    control the Corporate media and Hollywood

    So we may not be getting the full story
    Can I ask if you have
    checked his site out ?

    If so do you feel I am wrong so far?

    Sorry for all my questions but am looking
    forward to your reply

    Yours In Christ

    Alan H

    
    
    
14. Tom Usher
    Wednesday, May 20, 2009 @ 11:10:39 PM (Pacific Time)
    
    

    Hello Alan,

    Alan, you need to remember to input your first and last name. I did it for you this time.

    Also, if you want people to visit links, you have to supply them.

    Peace,
    Tom

    
    
    
15. Alan Hamer
    Thursday, May 21, 2009 @ 1:38:08 AM (Pacific Time)
    
    

    Hi Tom

    Thanks for that

    Getting back to the numbers

    I thought it might be beter if people searched then them
    selves any how I do not know if you are aware
    of Eugenics ?

    Below are 3 Registered USA patent numbers

    A patent can only be registered when

    the thing is proven to work

    If you type the numbers below into Google search

    one set at a time or search for your self at

    United States Patent office http://www..uspto.gov.com.....

    Or Google these numbers

    5242820

    5676977

    4647773

    Written in 1971 the making of AIDS & HIV

    The Flow chart
    http://www.boydgraves.com/flow.....chart/

    The Eugenic Movement To reduce the worlds population

    http://aidseugenics.blogspot.c.....allo.htm l

    I can pass more info
    if you are interested
    I have tracked down
    the the one hospital
    that is the only one
    that is licened to produce and make the
    aids cure and the Good
    doctor that patented it
    works at the Hospital
    in Israel.

    Regards Alan H

    
    
    
16. Alan Hamer
    Thursday, May 21, 2009 @ 1:46:24 AM (Pacific Time)
    
    

    Good Morning Tom

    Richard Koshimizu

    web address it works
    for me just tested it
    before posting

    Yep it does look a little long

    http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakod.....nsou.e.htm

    
    
    
17. Tom Usher
    Thursday, May 21, 2009 @ 5:18:16 PM (Pacific Time)
    
    

    Hello Al,

    Al, if you want to post comments here with links, that's what the comment feature is for. Some people have left a comment on a post which comment is not exactly on topic, and I allowed it for any number of reasons. However, it is clear that you want to cover a broad range of subjects. Doing so from scratch without tying them into the particular post is not conducive to good organization. I don't wish to be overly fussy about it; but if you wish to comment on eugenics, do a site search on "eugenics" without the quotation marks, select a post, and post your eugenics-related comment there. The same applies to HIV/AIDS.

    When you post a comment, please make the extra effort to tie in the material to the post if the tie-in is not self-explanatory from your comment. Please don't expect visitors and regular readers to go visit the linked material only to find out that it may or may not be germane. Let people know a little bit what they are in for beyond a simple large subject area such as "eugenics." Break it down a little more for them and me if you would. In other words, answer the question, "What's the point?" as if that question had already been posed directly to you: Anticipate it.

    Sometimes links aren't conducive to that approach, but you are a new commentator here and I want to establish this with you as much as possible since it obviously applies to you in large measure. I do always reserve the right to use my discretion in such matters.

    I know all of this is fair and makes perfect sense.

    So, please find the appropriate posts and post your comments if you wouldn't mind.

    I'll let the "eugenics" and "HIV/AIDS" comment stand here for now and perhaps permanently. I don't have the plugin installed that would allow me to simply move your comments for you, and I don't wish to go into the MySQL database to edit the table by hand. Perhaps I will install that plugin sooner than later, as it has been my intention to have it available.

    Now, Al, some of us are more capable of reading highly technical matter than are others. If you are going to link to material that is loaded with jargon, you are going to have to take the extra step of summarizing the material. What does it mean? Again, what's the point? Also, if you link to such material, I would like to see yet another step that demonstrates that you've looked into why something may or may not have been suppressed. If we are to draw conclusions, what are they and why should we accept them rather than opposing views? Does that make sense to you? Do you understand what I'm saying here? My tone is not condescending. I'm truly unsure. Although, I fully suspect you understand. (There have been visitors here who couldn't begin to comprehend. They stated so openly. It wasn't to their credit, of course, that they gave up with denunciations to boot.)

    Frankly, Al, it would have been better to start with introducing Boyd E. Graves before throwing patents at readers.

    The patents are back-up for Graves' theory. Starting the other way is a little too Socratic when the topic matter hasn't been established except in very broad terms such as "eugenics": Circuitous.

    Patent searching is better done directly: http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtm.....ch num.htm

    Direct links are better yet:
    5242820

    5676977

    4647773

    As for HIV/AIDS and the accusations of many Blacks, yes, I was familiar with it. If memory serves, I had seen "Boyd E. Graves" before. Am I open to definitive discovery that the U.S. government did or didn't manufacture the virus? Absolutely I am. There is no doubt whatsoever that the U.S. has officially conducted all sorts of utterly evil acts including but not limited to biological-warfare experimentation. We know for example that the Anthrax used against the U.S. Senate and elsewhere was from U.S. weapons labs. It was also not the result of a loner. The FBI was ordered to frame Bruce Ivins. (BRUCE IVINS: LONE FALSE-FLAG PERPETRATOR, FRAMED BY FBI AS CONTINUING COVER-UP, OR SOMETHING ELSE?) It was used as a false-flag attack as part of the larger 9-11 false-flag attack.

    The problem with the general population is that it is so willfully trusting (interesting combination of terms, isn't it?: willfully trusting) that there aren't extremely evil minds that get into so-called high places. The fact is that the whole system works to create evil-minded dupes to raise up (actually lower) into those places. There are people who will do anything for money, power, and control. They will kill their own if it comes to that. They won't hesitate to treat fellow Americans as expendable for their empire building. I hate it. I want their mentality banished forever. In my Heaven, it is and will be forever.

    This site is loaded with information and documentation along those false-flag-attack lines. As for whether or not there are Whites-first in the world who hold positions of immense military and scientific power, I know that to be the case simply by looking at outcomes. We know them by their fruit.

    Of course, the huge problem is that not enough people care about truth, per se. They want their truth contained so as not to upset the status quo too much. They aren't for radical change. I'm for radical change.

    How would I deal with Boyd E. Graves? I'd put him head-to-head with all comers on a level playing field where he could have equal access and equal opportunity to be supported by inquiring minds. Then, we'd let the chips fall where they may rather than doing perception management, as Donald Rumsfeld likes to call it.

    Concerning eugenics and how this ties in, if Graves' is right, then it does rightly fall under the category of stealth eugenics of a sort but much more so pure racism and genocide. Regardless, we must be careful in defining the term eugenics. It has its positive aspects when the connotation is solely about helping to improve the breed without resorting to denying those who are already here. In other words, forced sterilizations and the like are unacceptable in the effort to reduce and eventually eliminate the pain and suffering of the world. That can be view from both the mundane scientific sense and the Christian sense at the same time.

    Well, that's enough for now. I have many other issues on my plate. All of them tie in though to the central issue that is the New Commandment. What does it mean?

    Truth is Peace,

    Tom

    
    
    
18. Tom Usher
    Thursday, May 21, 2009 @ 5:19:29 PM (Pacific Time)
    
    

    Your URL is not good.

    Test links from the "Preview" mode if possible before submitting.

    
    
    
19. Tom Usher
    Thursday, May 21, 2009 @ 8:08:00 PM (Pacific Time)
    
    

    Okay Alan,

    The http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakod.....nsou.e.htm is working. You had a space in the "newversion" portion of the URL.

    Now, what about it's content? It makes many claims but gives no or little way for readers to review underlying facts, such as they may be. I would never use that cite as a source for supporting a position other than to show many insufficiently supported claims. It is as if he went out and took every claim, gathered it all together, and couched it as if not hard fact, at least highly likely. The fact that there are facts (able reasonably and easily to be substantiated) mixed in makes the process all the more difficult for the reader. Does one dismiss the whole thing on account of overreaching?

    It is a method of destroying opposition by inserting infiltrators who make wild claims to ruin the image (credibility) of a cause. It's worth bearing in mind.

    Look, people aren't approaching the issue seriously enough. If you're going to make a case, then where's the genealogy that has been submitted to Jews in opposition openly and directly to refute?

    Much of what is on the Internet is just thrown out there by the various sides. Some people claim they won't address allegations because they don't want to "dignify" the allegations. That can be and has been used to hide truths.

    I consider the work shoddy. It doesn't lend itself to serious analysis. Of course, there are Jews in powerful positions, both behind the scenes and right out front. That's been the case for a very long time. Anyone who doesn't know it is living under a rock.

    I'm not going to spend the time going through each personality mentioned by Richard Koshimizu. Some are well known to have Jewish ancestry that they haven't been, and aren't now, hiding. Would I be interested in seeing a really well-done bit of work showing all the genealogies? Sure.

    Do I believe that the Rothschilds are at the center of the banking plutocracy? Yes. Do I believe the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Federal Income Tax are schemes devised by bankers ultimately controlled by that family? Yes. Does that make me a racist or an ethnic bigot? How can it? I don't look at Jews as a blob any more than I look at any family or nation as a blob. Everyone is an individual. The Jews are human beings. Am I against the plutocracy? Absolutely I am against it. It's not a good thing. The people running it are wrong. Capitalism is wrong. Banking is wrong. Money is wrong. Trade is wrong. Greed is wrong. Selfishness is wrong. There is a better, and best, way, which I've put forth as the Christian Commons Project.

    Do I want to kill the Rothschilds? No. I'm against killing. They all should be too. What I want is for the top bankers to repent, to help do away with the whole system of mammon, and to turn to giving and sharing all, as one real family should.

    I have no problem with Jews, per se, as Jesus was, and is, a real Jew. In that sense, so am I. I could very well have mundane Jewish bloodlines in my ancestry as well. To me, it would be irrelevant, as I put stock in spiritlines.

    Peace,

    Tom

    
    
    
20. Alan Hamer
    Friday, May 22, 2009 @ 7:53:33 AM (Pacific Time)
    
    

    Hi Tom
    WOW

    Please I am not a edicated person

    I was NOT edicate by state systems

    I watch and learnt
    from nature

    I was about 22 when
    I started to teached my self how to read

    Our Lord was not big
    on wrighting

    In the Book of Enock
    Enock taked in Parabels
    our Lord talked in
    parabels as well at times.

    I guess I DO think out side to box but for me that is normal

    I built my first HH2 cell for about $10
    power car some time ago

    I now also drive my Electric Sola powered
    car and I am thinking
    of building a anti gravity vehicle all this is not new if you search regestered
    1959 patens

    I did try and post some coments on other topics
    But could not work out how to do it

    It would be great if I
    could e-mail you stuff
    and leave it up to you
    if you wish to post or not that.S cool with me

    Geting back to our friends the Zionist
    we need to pray for them
    as they are blinded.

    Whot does it profit a mam If he gains the world BUT LOOSES HIS SOUL

    Geting back to
    Richard Koshimizu
    ok it is not classy
    web site
    But my gut feeling
    and from what I have
    been able to find out
    I would not wright the guy off

    Its a bit like back in the 1970.s Stan Dayo
    made some clames
    Some I new to be true
    so I phoned him

    I must now go to bed
    But can I leave you
    with this about 60 milion indian's was
    murdered by the white man and the HOPI tribes
    new about and believed in Jesus before the invasion

    Or as they see it world war 1

    Regards Alan H

    
    
    
21. Tom Usher
    Friday, May 22, 2009 @ 7:09:49 PM (Pacific Time)
    
    

    Okay Alan,

    Our Lord was not big
    on wrighting

    However, he was big on reading and said nothing against writing, per se. Yes, he taught in parables as part of the continuity of prophecy. That never meant that others wouldn't come along and write also in continuity.

    It would be great if I
    could e-mail you stuff
    and leave it up to you
    if you wish to post or not that.S cool with me

    The way it is, is better.

    Geting back to
    Richard Koshimizu
    ok it is not classy
    web site
    But my gut feeling
    and from what I have
    been able to find out
    I would not wright the guy off

    I write off false portions of half-truths or I reserve judgment. As I made clear is my position, not everything on his site is factually wrong. Your gut feeling needs to be the movement of the Holy Spirit. Let Richard Koshimizu do a better job.

    But can I leave you
    with this about 60 milion indian's was
    murdered by the white man and the HOPI tribes
    new about and believed in Jesus before the invasion

    This site is loaded with truth including about the atrocities done to the Indians. However, the Indians were not all saintly, as any honest Indian will attest. The Hemisphere was not Heaven before the Whites arrived. It still isn't Heaven.

    Alan, you have to deal with what you are given. If it is important enough to you, you'll find the posts concerning your topics of interest and post your comments there. I'm more interested in healing your dyslexia.

    Peace,
    Tom Usher

    
    
    
22. Alan Hamer
    Friday, May 22, 2009 @ 9:15:05 PM (Pacific Time)
    
    

    Hi Tom

    Thanks for that I will need to re read latter.

    New Commandment. What does it mean?

    To Love one another
    has Christ loves us

    I think thats right
    is it ?

    Getting back to the Jew's and the bloodline
    Can I jew prove his
    bloodline by DNA ?

    It is my understanding that a Jew is alway a jew even if he turn away from God and takes on a different faith
    am I right in thinking that ?

    Ok hears my Question
    who are the gentiles

    We are from the seed of Noah and his 3 Sons

    Does this make Us
    JEWISH ? I am interesting to hear your view as I am a little confused on this one.

    I like your like to
    Christian Commons Project.

    Havent read it all
    but will try to

    REgards Alan H

    
    
    
23. Tom Usher
    Friday, May 22, 2009 @ 10:09:53 PM (Pacific Time)
    
    

    Hello Again, Alan,

    It is my understanding that a Jew is alway a jew even if he turn away from God and takes on a different faith
    am I right in thinking that ?

    Mundane Jewishness is a moving target. Is it religious, genetic, or neither after a while? It is actually all three depending upon the Jew.

    who are the gentiles

    We are from the seed of Noah and his 3 Sons

    Does this make Us
    JEWISH ?

    It depends upon the context in which you are using the term Jew. You are also presupposing the literalness of the "Jewish" version of the flood: "Noah story." The Jewish version could be closer to what happened than the surviving Sumerian version. Chroniclers compete to control.

    I'm not strictly a literalist, but I don't preclude literal accuracy. For instance, I believe Jesus was, and is, an actual person who came here and did perform miracles by God. Just because there are mythological stories that prophesy does not preclude the literal truth. Jesus fulfilled prophecy even universally in large measure.

    The most important thing is discovering righteousness and adhering to it. Jesus taught righteous behavior and words and thoughts and feelings regardless of anything else.

    Truth,

    Tom

    
    
    
24. Alan Hamer
    Saturday, May 23, 2009 @ 9:42:04 AM (Pacific Time)
    
    

    Hi Tom

    I can see you are smart
    but at times lacking in compresion

    Do you beleve the Kj ?
    or are you saying
    it is not correct
    IF SO WHY????

    To put a lnk to the flood to ILLuminati
    controled web site Wikipedia ?

    
    
    
25. Alan Hamer
    Saturday, May 23, 2009 @ 5:24:29 PM (Pacific Time)
    
    

    Hi Tom

    sorry for my knee jerk
    reaction it was late last night when I red your responce that creats more questions than answers.

    Ok maybe I did not understand your point of view when you wrote
    //////////////////////
    Mundane Jewishness is a moving target. Is it religious, genetic, or neither after a while? It is actually all three depending upon the Jew.
    //////////////////////

    Regarding my comments
    about the food and the link to Wikipedia !
    The Wikipedia is not the Gospel as some may think it is.

    Ok I am young in the faith I have been told
    the the bible is 100%
    correct and I believe
    that to be true at this pint in time.

    Ok I have some points that
    I do not under stand
    but that does not meen
    to is incorect .

    The Bible give referance
    to the flood as fact not
    a myth as the small group of Elite wrighters behind the Wikipedia wright.

    Are you saying that the
    Flood is a Myth ?

    surviving Sumerian version ?

    This is new to me and I
    will need to do some home work on it.

    Thank you for your responce

    Alan

    p.s.
    I was given yesterday
    a 450 page document
    1970 HOUSE BILL 15090
    on the making of Aids
    and to was aproved and
    $10 million of your tax
    dollars was given to the project.

    
    
    
26. Tom Usher
    Saturday, May 23, 2009 @ 7:18:28 PM (Pacific Time)
    
    

    Alan,

    Please change your name to initial caps. I've fixed your most recent submissions, but you need to reset your cookie. You switched from initial caps when you changed your email address.

    As for your last two comments, I will let you do more studying on your own, as you've suggested yourself that you need to do.

    Briefly though, in answer to your main question, I do not hold with New Earth theology. Satan is not tricking souls into falsely believing that the Earth is billions of mundane years old. That though does not preclude that much of the scripture is to be taken "literally."

    Also, the Illuminati is amorphous. It is spirit. It owns and controls this whole world. Satan is the god of this worldly world, Alan.

    When I link to the Wikipedia, that doesn't endorse the whole Wikipedia. Alan, take a step back and read more of this site. You need to do more studying about semantics.

    Peace and Happy Researching,

    Tom

    
    
    
27. Alan Hamer
    Sunday, May 24, 2009 @ 6:16:49 AM (Pacific Time)
    
    

    Hi Tom

    Thanks for that

    Sorry I do not under stand

    name to initial caps ?
    but you need to reset your cookie. ? yes I have 3 e-mail addreses

    Yes I agree Earth is not billions of years old.

    God made it that way
    thing where made old
    He Created Adam not baby
    Adam It like what came first the Chiken or the egg,the egg when hatch
    the chick would die God
    so made the chicken fist
    If Adam had cut down the apple tree He might of said it 80 years old
    after counting the yearly growth ringd.
    But he would of been wrong.

    I wish to differ on your
    view about the Illuminati just being
    a spirit 30 years ago
    I was made aware of the
    Illuminati and I nexted
    with and befriended a small group of rebelious
    young folks who wanted no more of there parents
    lust for moeny and power
    Yes I WOULD AGREE they are controled by the Evil one.

    Yes I KNOW who the god of this world systems is.

    Blind freedy should be able to see that.

    You wrote:
    You need to do more studying about semantics

    Yes Thats why I was asking you the questions

    Regards Alan

    
    
    
28. Tom Usher
    Sunday, May 24, 2009 @ 5:45:49 PM (Pacific Time)
    
    

    SEMANTICAL THEOLOGY: FUNDAMENTALISM, THE EDEN STORY, AND WHO IS A REAL JEW

    
    
    

1. 
   
   Tom Usher
   

   Standing Comment, all posts and pages:

   To all homosexuals and their supporters, condoners, promoters, accepters, confirmers, and the like:

   Unless you have something completely new that hasn't already been refuted, don't bother. It won't show up.

   Rehashing what has already been refuted is a waste of everyone's time.

   I'm not interested in casting pearls before swine, giving the children's bread to the dogs, or rebuking a forever scorner.

   Learn or go away: There is zero wisdom in homosexuality. Homosexuality is wrong. Nothing any homosexual or anyone else can say or do will alter it. No one needs the Bible to know it either. It's prima facie. There's no such thing as an unrepentant-homosexual Christian. There never has been and never will be. That's the way of it. If you don't like it, change.

   Do site searches on the various topics concerning homosexuality to determine if your "point" has already been handled. Currently, I provide three different search methods. The "WordPress" search is still the most thorough.

   ---

   The same can be done regarding militarism, capitalism, coercion, and many other main issues and themes.

   ---

   TREATMENT, RUDENESS, POLITENESS, OFFENSE, TRUTH

   Many times over the course of this website's existence, I've had commentators complain about how I've treated them and/or others. Much less frequently has anyone taken exception to those commentator's comments. I assume that's because for one, I appear to be holding my own.

   Often, I have raised the fact that Jesus called certain people "serpents." I've often also mentioned how he cleaned the temple with whip in hand, not that he used it on anyone. It certainly doesn't say that he did, and neither was he charged with it in the kangaroo court of the serpents who ended up murdering him by proxy just for, among other wonderful things, speaking out and speaking truth.

   If I say that those who are engaged in serpentine behavior are the New Testament "serpents," then why take offense at my saying it rather than standing with Jesus and me about it?

   If others don't like it that I treat others or them the way I have in this regard, why don't they take it up with the serpents and/or their own consciences and God?

   If I wanted to catch flies, I'd use honey. I don't want flies on this level. Human beings aren't to be on the level of flies. If the truth is bitter as vinegar, then ask yourself why and learn to taste it as sweet but not sickeningly so. Why attack the message and messenger, as the serpents did, and become a serpent by so doing?

   The issue is not "name calling" on some bratty, childish level. When Jesus said "serpents," he was not being as a brat. His level was completely adult to adults and children. He dared say that the children understood the clear and plain truth before the adults who, afterall, had been abused and socialized by the serpents. He still calls adults back. Those who hear him and know his voice (truth) turn around and do the other required things together as well.

   What is it for a human being to be more serpentine or reptilian than what God initially gave? What was and remains Jesus's point? What is the reptilian brain versus the vastly higher human brain with its cerebral cortex and frontal and temporal lobes and specific areas of altruistic sentiments and abilities? What are those higher areas before they are damaged, before the communication pathways to them and between them are diminished by evil that is always some form of abuse? How are those pathways reestablished or created where they never were in this fleshly life?

   The snake lays its eggs. The eggs hatch. The snake parent doesn't nurture or raise the offspring. It's every snake for itself. Human parents and family are not designed to be that way. Humans hand down the learning of nurturing. Many people get better training than do others, and many people have a greater aptitude for learning and predisposition for the higher and highest virtues. Many are less abused. People can change for the better and best though, no matter where the starting point. They only can't if they don't — if they reject it.

   Snakes, of course, also come in venomous varieties and in strangling varieties, etc., such that they have been attackers and even devourers of humans for eons, guilty and innocent alike.

   Now, Jesus knew that most people could relate to what were, and still are, largely considered "good" parenting skills and "good" "family" relations. He regularly used those concepts to get people to consider the wider implications for the whole of humanity. He did know that many would refuse. He let them go. He didn't demand secular or false-religion legislation to rein them in with threats of violence and imprisonment. He was not and is not coercive. Even his Church is a voluntary place to be.

   What he still teaches (through the written words in the New Testament and as those connect with the Old and also teaches through the Holy Spirit he definitely sent as he said he would) is, among many other things, that "good" is vastly better than has been commonly accepted and that real "family" is everyone left after all the rest have rejected the higher and highest good. He raised the standards far above the Old Testament and far above the "modern" standard.

   The American Empire and the American people in general aren't even touching the hem of his garment, let alone even attempting to stand upright and side-by-side with him.

   I point out that Jesus was, and is, a Real Liberal Christian. He is the one who brought back this censored truth that is the light. After he had spoken it and lived it and was murdered for doing so, the censors set about to re-censor it and did. They couldn't put it out though — couldn't completely extinguish the truth. I wouldn't be saying it now again with all credit to God, just as Jesus, if they had been able to completely block it.

   I point out that each of those terms ("real," "liberal," and "Christian," along with "Church") are actually redundant terms — synonyms that are so close that they become one. The term "liberal" here is not the common usage, which common usage is a deliberate corruption of the term. There is no harm in real liberalism. There is no vileness in it. There is only beneficence. "Real" may be understood as the opposite of false-hearted, dark side, and dead of the Holy Spirit. Christian is both real and liberal in those senses. To arrive at living, doing, being those full senses requires what Jesus lives, does, and is in the highest. Finally, the Church is the whole.

   Who are they who want to drag it down, censor it, work against it, lessen it, ignore it, etc.? Well, who sides with Jesus and who sides against him? Did the serpents side with him then? Do they now?

   We call war-mongers "hawks." We call "peacemakers" blessed and "doves." Why do the hawks not take offense at "hawks" but do take offense at "serpents"? "Hawks" is not yet as telling to the general public, but I must tell you that all hawks are serpents. Why do some say, "Greed is good" but take offense at "serpents"? I tell you there is no difference between the selfish and the serpents. Why do people take offense at serpents when they do not take offense at homosexuality? I tell you the homosexual spirit also comes out from the dark side. It is a choice. It is harmful. Many are abused with it. Many never overcome it. Their very brain matter is transformed by it. Then they claim it is good when it remains confusion and definitely wrong and harmful.

   Many arguments were put forth in support of tolerance. I understood that Jesus "tolerated," as in he did not execute wrath but rather told the truth and let the blind follow the blind (blind to the truth) into the ditch of their own making. I have watched while the movement has been corrupted into condoning what was once only to be tolerated. I have watched further while it has moved from condoning to promoting even to the youngest children to get to them before the truth does. I have seen evil at work, and I sound the alarm. I face censorship and other negative reactions for it.

   As the American Empire claims to be a light to the world, it murders innocent babies by Hellfire missiles fired from predator drones controlled by armchair, video-gaming serpents in uniform. It tortures those who are not even suspects. It spies on its own without even probable cause or reasonable suspicion. It lies its way into wars for spoils and control. It neglects its poor, whom it treads down for the sakes of the superrich — for the sake of the massive flow of mammon from the bottom up (no trickledown — trickledown is a farce and always has been). All is claimed to be okay in America though — that America is headed in the right direction — because soon, even "don't tell, don't ask" will be a thing of the quaint past and homosexuals may be able to sleep together and have sex in the barracks with the "blessing" of the Empire while they practice murdering the innocent for the sake of homosexual, greedy plutocrats who own them and who, in turn, are owned by the dark-side spirit named by God and Jesus as Satan.

   Whose side are you on? I speak truth to warn. I don't tell the secular government what to do other than occasionally to say what at least would be less hypocritical within their fallen, unenlightened system. I do so for spiritual reasons. What I want is the Christian Commons.

   Now, if you submit a comment:

   • Will it be twisting my words or taking parts or the whole out of context (the biggest picture)?
   • Will it be with an eye to finding out first or attacking without knowing? What are your intentions? Are they good or evil?
   • Are you with the takers?
   • Are you with the oppressors?
   • Are you for greed, selfish hoarding, violence, war making?

     The words of his mouth were smoother than butter, but war was in his heart: his words were softer than oil, yet were they drawn swords. (Psalms 55:21)

   • Are you for depravity and harming others and yourself sexually and psychically, torture, waterboarding, espionage, deceiving, and/or all or any of the rest of the evil spirit; or are you contrite with me toward the real God who is always peace?
   • Will you submit your real full name or be cowardly without cause? (Some have some mundane fears? I don't seek anyone's unknowing, unwilling sacrifice.)
   • Will you post on the post to which you refer, or will you slip over somewhere else thinking you'll barb me? You won't. You'll barb yourself.
   • Will you "instruct" me, or will you look for mutual edification or spiritual growth?
   • Will you complain, attack, and seek to come off as offended for others and/or yourself, or will you truly seek ultimate truth and impart real light here and to the world?
   • Will you be nothing but an Internet troll?

   What you write here against the Real Liberal Christian Church founded by Jesus Christ will mark you in the Biblical sense unless you show that you have turned and are repenting in time to escape the damnation of your own choosing. That's the way of it. Don't be tempted by the devil to stand opposed to the call of righteousness. Overcome such evil temptation. Help others to help yet others to come to righteous behavior through-and-through.

   Check out how even after reading this, people will still take it out of context and twist it to an evil end.

Please Comment: