THE FAILURE OF OBAMANOMICS
THE FAILURE OF OBAMANOMICS
This is my reply to, "The Failure of Obamanomics," by EuroYank. EuroYank NEW WORLD ORDER REPORTS. July 09, 2009.
Thank you for inviting my comment. Well, EuroYank, I agree but with qualifications. Keynesianism doesn't work when all that is attempted is stimulus checks and bankster bailouts. It was a corruption of Keynesianism. If the money printed (12.8 trillion and counting) hadn't as usual gone to white collar-gangsters on Wall Street and had gone to Main Street works instead, everything would be different now. I'm no disciple of Keynes, but Ludwig von Mises is no one to follow either. I don't know your take on him.
You, EuroYank, probably know that I'm anti-mammon and hold that the whole economic system of money is inherently evil. It is an utterly selfish device. Nothing truly good comes out from it. It is always a net liability. It always devours more than it brings forth in the aggregate.
The whole scam is to increase the percentage of payments going to the top bankers -- interest payments on the national debt -- economic slavery via taxes for unworthy causes (predator drones, etc.). Whether the U.S. remains the world's reserve currency or not is irrelevant to their task. They want to own and control whatever currency system will be unfolded to the general, unsuspecting public. It's the Great Game and Grand Chessboard played out via cyber-accounting entries now.
Who has the upper hand? What Godly things can be done to take away that power and to do the right things as called for by Jesus Christ? Gold is no answer, although I don't fully discredit your efforts here at seeking to educate and to provide some measure of repair.
Your "fast-breeder of debt" observation is correct and a problem because the money has gone to masking toxic securities. The idea is the largest transfer of wealth in history from the bottom up. It's the exact opposite of everything trickle-down economics claims to be, and only dupes (mostly neocon, false-hearted, self-styled Zionist, Fox-News-watcher types) buy into it.
You are absolutely right that the common people have tightened their belts and are trying their best to get out from under insane mountains of debt that was created on purpose by those who have brought on the crash.
Mr. Potter has guaranteed the banks and is going about buying up the town (globe) at severely reduced prices.
The Chinese still don't stand a chance in this game because as technically proficient as they sometimes appear to be, they are outmatched in the greed game. Wall Streeters don't build Great Walls to keep out the vultures. They knock them down and swoop in as the vultures. They take losses to do it. In their idea of the end, they fatten up. We as Christians though know better. Their end is not sitting pretty. Only the truly repentant and atoning will ever sit pretty in eternity.
The problem is the Federal Reserve and the World Bank and International Monetary Fund and other Bretton Woods organizations that are used in pursuit of neoliberal and neoconservative agendas to further dominate and enslave the peoples of the world. There are resource and labor wars ongoing, as you know EuroYank.
What should happen as a stepping stone is the abolition of the Federal Reserve. The coining/printing of money should not be privatized, ever. The money should be interest free rather than what we have now. You're familiar with Greenbacks (the real ones started by Abraham Lincoln). They were initially redeemable in metals/coins, but that really isn't necessary.
Legal tender status guaranteed that creditors would have to accept the notes despite the fact that they were not backed by gold, bank deposits, or government reserves and bore no interest. However, the First Legal Tender Act did not make the notes an unlimited legal tender as they could not be used by merchants to pay customs duties on imports and could not be used by the government to pay interest on its bonds. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Stat es_Notes
There's the problem. New United States Notes (USN) should definitely be used to pay off the national debt thereby ending the income stream of U.S. Bond holders and primarily international bankers and financiers (not code for Jews by the way, even though the plutocracy is loaded with people of Jewish descent -- but also Gentiles).
The difference between a United States Note and a Federal Reserve Note is that a United States Note represented a "bill of credit" where the currency was transferred into circulation free of interest. Federal Reserve Notes are based on debt purchased by the Federal Reserve, and thus generate seigniorage [This is "revenue or a profit taken from the minting of coins, usually the difference between the value of the bullion used and the face value of the coin." -- American Heritage Dictionary. Consider though that the Federal Reserve mints nothing, provides nothing of value, but rather just enters numbers into the Federal Reserve System computer. That's all. They take income taxes for doing nothing. How long are the American people going to put up with it?] for the Federal Reserve System which serves as a lending intermediary between the Treasury and the public.
There's more of the major problem right there. The private bankers have a monopoly. They gained it by secretly drafted legislation rammed through in 1913 while the opposition was unaware/not around as planned by the Aldrich.
Here's where it started in public. That's the Aldrich-Vreeland Act of 1908 that lead up to the infamous Federal Reserve Act. Just follow the money and family allegiances to see what really happened. U.S. Senator Nelson W. Aldrich was the strategically placed villain. Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller was named after him: his grandfather (cozy). Do you want to get ahead in that world? Sell your soul.
Stephen Zarlenga (http://www.monetary.org/index.html) has similar ideas about USN that have gained currency with Dennis Kucinich. It's not original with Zarlenga by any stretch.
We don't need any metals backing up the money. Fiat currency is just fine for purposes of a medium of exchange. The only thing that needs to happen is tying the volume or supply to real productivity. Let the supply exactly meet the demand for real goods and services without interest to bankers or speculators. Who needs them? They just create artificial scarcity.
With the right unselfish attitude, we don't need any medium of exchange either -- just a righteous consensus. It's all a choice. Which mind is best?
You are right that Obama is wrong, but he's a front man for the plutocrats, who actually control most of the world's gold reserves by the way. Think about it.
It's good to see you writing articles. Peace and blessings to all your visitors and readers even the ones who loathe Jesus Christ. God alone knows whether they will turn to see the light. I sentence no one.
- Technorati Tags: 1908, 1913, Abraham Lincoln, aggregate, Aldrich, Aldrich-Vreeland Act, American Heritage Dictionary, American people, anti-mammon, artificial scarcity, atoning, bailouts, bank deposits, bankers, banksters, bill of credit, bonds, bottom up, Bretton Woods, bring forth, bullion, Chinese, Christians, code, coins, corruption, crash, creditors, customs duties, cyber-accounting, debt, debt purchase, Dennis Kucinich, device, devours, disciple, discredit, dominate, dupes, economic slavery, economic system, educate, enslave, eternity, EuroYank, face value, failure, fast-breeder, Federal Reserve, Federal Reserve Act, Federal Reserve Notes, Federal Reserve System, fiat currency, financiers, First Legal Tender Act, Fox News, fractional-reserve banking, front man, gangsters, Gentiles, God, gold, gold reserves, goods and services, government reserves, Grand Chessboard, Great Game, Great Wall, greed, Greenbacks, imports, income taxes, inherently evil, interest, interest free, international bankers, International Monetary Fund, Jesus Christ, Jewish, Jews, Keynes, Keynesianism, legal tender, lending, Ludwig von Mises, Main Street, medium of exchange, merchants, metals, minting, mints, monetary.org, money, monopoly, Mr. Potter, national debt, Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller, Nelson W. Aldrich, neocon, neoconservative, neoliberal, net liability, NEW WORLD ORDER REPORTS, Obama, Obamanomics, outmatched, plutocracy, plutocrats, predator drones, private bankers, privatized, productivity, profit, redeemable, redistribution of wealth, repair, repentant, resource wars, revenue, righteous consensus, Rockefeller, scam, secret, see the light, seigniorage, selfish, sentence, soul, speculators, Stephen Zarlenga, stimulus checks, taxes, toxic securities, transfer of wealth, trickle-down economics, turn, U.S. Bond holders, U.S. Treasury, United States Notes, unselfish, unworthy, USN, value, vultures, Wall Street, Wall Streeters, wealth redistribution, white collar, World Bank, world's reserve currency, Zarlenga, Zionism, Zionist
Tom Usher
Standing Comment, all posts and pages:
To all homosexuals and their supporters, condoners, promoters, accepters, confirmers, and the like:
Unless you have something completely new that hasn't already been refuted, don't bother. It won't show up.
Rehashing what has already been refuted is a waste of everyone's time.
I'm not interested in casting pearls before swine, giving the children's bread to the dogs, or rebuking a forever scorner.
Learn or go away: There is zero wisdom in homosexuality. Homosexuality is wrong. Nothing any homosexual or anyone else can say or do will alter it. No one needs the Bible to know it either. It's prima facie. There's no such thing as an unrepentant-homosexual Christian. There never has been and never will be. That's the way of it. If you don't like it, change.
Do site searches on the various topics concerning homosexuality to determine if your "point" has already been handled. Currently, I provide three different search methods. The "WordPress" search is still the most thorough.
The same can be done regarding militarism, capitalism, coercion, and many other main issues and themes.
TREATMENT, RUDENESS, POLITENESS, OFFENSE, TRUTH
Many times over the course of this website's existence, I've had commentators complain about how I've treated them and/or others. Much less frequently has anyone taken exception to those commentator's comments. I assume that's because for one, I appear to be holding my own.
Often, I have raised the fact that Jesus called certain people "serpents." I've often also mentioned how he cleaned the temple with whip in hand, not that he used it on anyone. It certainly doesn't say that he did, and neither was he charged with it in the kangaroo court of the serpents who ended up murdering him by proxy just for, among other wonderful things, speaking out and speaking truth.
If I say that those who are engaged in serpentine behavior are the New Testament "serpents," then why take offense at my saying it rather than standing with Jesus and me about it?
If others don't like it that I treat others or them the way I have in this regard, why don't they take it up with the serpents and/or their own consciences and God?
If I wanted to catch flies, I'd use honey. I don't want flies on this level. Human beings aren't to be on the level of flies. If the truth is bitter as vinegar, then ask yourself why and learn to taste it as sweet but not sickeningly so. Why attack the message and messenger, as the serpents did, and become a serpent by so doing?
The issue is not "name calling" on some bratty, childish level. When Jesus said "serpents," he was not being as a brat. His level was completely adult to adults and children. He dared say that the children understood the clear and plain truth before the adults who, afterall, had been abused and socialized by the serpents. He still calls adults back. Those who hear him and know his voice (truth) turn around and do the other required things together as well.
What is it for a human being to be more serpentine or reptilian than what God initially gave? What was and remains Jesus's point? What is the reptilian brain versus the vastly higher human brain with its cerebral cortex and frontal and temporal lobes and specific areas of altruistic sentiments and abilities? What are those higher areas before they are damaged, before the communication pathways to them and between them are diminished by evil that is always some form of abuse? How are those pathways reestablished or created where they never were in this fleshly life?
The snake lays its eggs. The eggs hatch. The snake parent doesn't nurture or raise the offspring. It's every snake for itself. Human parents and family are not designed to be that way. Humans hand down the learning of nurturing. Many people get better training than do others, and many people have a greater aptitude for learning and predisposition for the higher and highest virtues. Many are less abused. People can change for the better and best though, no matter where the starting point. They only can't if they don't — if they reject it.
Snakes, of course, also come in venomous varieties and in strangling varieties, etc., such that they have been attackers and even devourers of humans for eons, guilty and innocent alike.
Now, Jesus knew that most people could relate to what were, and still are, largely considered "good" parenting skills and "good" "family" relations. He regularly used those concepts to get people to consider the wider implications for the whole of humanity. He did know that many would refuse. He let them go. He didn't demand secular or false-religion legislation to rein them in with threats of violence and imprisonment. He was not and is not coercive. Even his Church is a voluntary place to be.
What he still teaches (through the written words in the New Testament and as those connect with the Old and also teaches through the Holy Spirit he definitely sent as he said he would) is, among many other things, that "good" is vastly better than has been commonly accepted and that real "family" is everyone left after all the rest have rejected the higher and highest good. He raised the standards far above the Old Testament and far above the "modern" standard.
The American Empire and the American people in general aren't even touching the hem of his garment, let alone even attempting to stand upright and side-by-side with him.
I point out that Jesus was, and is, a Real Liberal Christian. He is the one who brought back this censored truth that is the light. After he had spoken it and lived it and was murdered for doing so, the censors set about to re-censor it and did. They couldn't put it out though — couldn't completely extinguish the truth. I wouldn't be saying it now again with all credit to God, just as Jesus, if they had been able to completely block it.
I point out that each of those terms ("real," "liberal," and "Christian," along with "Church") are actually redundant terms — synonyms that are so close that they become one. The term "liberal" here is not the common usage, which common usage is a deliberate corruption of the term. There is no harm in real liberalism. There is no vileness in it. There is only beneficence. "Real" may be understood as the opposite of false-hearted, dark side, and dead of the Holy Spirit. Christian is both real and liberal in those senses. To arrive at living, doing, being those full senses requires what Jesus lives, does, and is in the highest. Finally, the Church is the whole.
Who are they who want to drag it down, censor it, work against it, lessen it, ignore it, etc.? Well, who sides with Jesus and who sides against him? Did the serpents side with him then? Do they now?
We call war-mongers "hawks." We call "peacemakers" blessed and "doves." Why do the hawks not take offense at "hawks" but do take offense at "serpents"? "Hawks" is not yet as telling to the general public, but I must tell you that all hawks are serpents. Why do some say, "Greed is good" but take offense at "serpents"? I tell you there is no difference between the selfish and the serpents. Why do people take offense at serpents when they do not take offense at homosexuality? I tell you the homosexual spirit also comes out from the dark side. It is a choice. It is harmful. Many are abused with it. Many never overcome it. Their very brain matter is transformed by it. Then they claim it is good when it remains confusion and definitely wrong and harmful.
Many arguments were put forth in support of tolerance. I understood that Jesus "tolerated," as in he did not execute wrath but rather told the truth and let the blind follow the blind (blind to the truth) into the ditch of their own making. I have watched while the movement has been corrupted into condoning what was once only to be tolerated. I have watched further while it has moved from condoning to promoting even to the youngest children to get to them before the truth does. I have seen evil at work, and I sound the alarm. I face censorship and other negative reactions for it.
As the American Empire claims to be a light to the world, it murders innocent babies by Hellfire missiles fired from predator drones controlled by armchair, video-gaming serpents in uniform. It tortures those who are not even suspects. It spies on its own without even probable cause or reasonable suspicion. It lies its way into wars for spoils and control. It neglects its poor, whom it treads down for the sakes of the superrich — for the sake of the massive flow of mammon from the bottom up (no trickledown — trickledown is a farce and always has been). All is claimed to be okay in America though — that America is headed in the right direction — because soon, even "don't tell, don't ask" will be a thing of the quaint past and homosexuals may be able to sleep together and have sex in the barracks with the "blessing" of the Empire while they practice murdering the innocent for the sake of homosexual, greedy plutocrats who own them and who, in turn, are owned by the dark-side spirit named by God and Jesus as Satan.
Whose side are you on? I speak truth to warn. I don't tell the secular government what to do other than occasionally to say what at least would be less hypocritical within their fallen, unenlightened system. I do so for spiritual reasons. What I want is the Christian Commons.
Now, if you submit a comment:
What you write here against the Real Liberal Christian Church founded by Jesus Christ will mark you in the Biblical sense unless you show that you have turned and are repenting in time to escape the damnation of your own choosing. That's the way of it. Don't be tempted by the devil to stand opposed to the call of righteousness. Overcome such evil temptation. Help others to help yet others to come to righteous behavior through-and-through.
Check out how even after reading this, people will still take it out of context and twist it to an evil end.