A REPLY TO: MUSLIMS SHOULD THANK THE JEWS FOR MAKING THEM ATTRACTIVE
This is my reply to Morris's comment over on his post: "Muslims should thank the Jews for making them attractive."
I put it here to increase exposure of the concepts involved.
Morris lives in England, east of London I believe. He's in his mid-50's and is of Jewish extraction. Morris has a keen interest in how chemicals introduced into our bodies and general environment have altered hormonal balances, etc., that he correctly believes is contributing to a rise in homosexual and other aberrant behaviors. Most of us will be familiar with the news reports about huge numbers of inter-sexed fish never before seen in Chesapeake Bay for instance. It's just the tip of the iceberg. In addition, Morris did a video interview of an ultra-orthodox Neturei Karta rabbi who discusses how the Judaism of the Zionists is not Biblically well-founded at all. You may see Morris's video uploads and favorites over on YouTube.
You might want to watch this one in particular to start with http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNqEt0ciN 9w if Google's YouTube hasn't censored it. It's not working as of the time stamp of this post. Google is part of the Homosexual/Zionist Movement in case you were unaware of that. Post: GOOGLE CENSORING THIS SITE: TRUTH, AMONG OTHER TRUTHS, THAT HOMOSEX IS A CHOICE, ALWAYS HARMFUL, AND ANTICHRIST
While the homosexuals used to decry how they weren't allowed to be themselves, they now work furiously to prevent others from being able to speak about the subject. They have their superrich banksters pulling levers behind the curtain. It's as obvious as obvious can be. It's called cause and effect. It's called knowing them by their fruit or results. We now have Barack Obama, hand-picked by the Bilderberg and other plutocrats, giving a major speech to the homosexuals saying that homosexuality is just as worthy as heterosexuality. Well it is not worthy. It is coming out from the dark side. Those homosexuals will find out that they are serving in ensnaring themselves in a trap of their own devising.
Morris placed that video as a "Video Response" to another video condemning Sally Kern's comments about the danger of the homosexual agenda on America. Now, Morris is over in the U.K., and I'm not a conservative, Republican, self-styled evangelical Christian, so Morris and I come at Sally Kern's remarks not from the typical ideology that the activist homosexuals love to use as if it's the only one opposed to homosexuality. Sally Kern is a state representative in Oklahoma. You can see the pro-homo video (and many others) denouncing her on YouTube.
Here's the one in question:
I don't know all of Sally's politics, but I would be hugely surprised if she agreed with me concerning true Christianity. Nevertheless, let me briefly sort out some of the errors in the various videos made against her position.
First, a representative does not necessarily represent all the people of a district in the manner suggested in some of the videos. She represents those who voted her into office. It is up to her once she's in as to the manner and degree to which she'll compromise on issues, etc. If she loses the next election on account of those who are pro-homosexuality "rights" having voted her out and voted in a homosexual, then those who voted for her will not have their views furthered in the state legislature for that district. That's the way it works. Would it suddenly become okay with the homosexuals that the anti-homosexuals don't have representation? The mundane system is inherently flawed. It's competitive. This is a huge subject that I won't attempt to cover more here.
Second, there is no doubt whatsoever that "sex education" contains those who are advocating for introducing ideas to the very young that many people believe are detrimental. Followers of Alfred Kinsey are extremely dangerous to the whole of society.
Here's a video that covers some of this: Secret History: Kinsey's Paedophiles http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid= 8606305708018993332. If that one doesn't work, try this: http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Se cret+History%3A+Kinsey%27s+Paedophiles# Watch what happens when the homosexuals become the fascists.
Third, the terrorism of the Oklahoma Federal Building and 9/11 was an inside job by those who are connected with both the Zionist and Homosexual Movements. Sally may not know that, but I do. Those at the very top of the inverted pyramid that will be turned right-side up and then leveled by this Second-Coming knowledge, know it too. That's why they are scrambling to censor and marginalize. They don't want an open and honest debate. Anyone who can't see that is hypnotized under the spell of those very movements.
Sally said that in her view, homosexuality is more corrosive to the social fabric and proper ordering of things than is the ostensible terrorist threat or Islam. Well, that belies some of her lack of fuller understanding, but she's not wrong that homosexuality is corrosive to the heterosexual family structure that should have been enhanced rather than further corroded by fracturing. Of course, fracturing is what Satan does.
Just look at the mind experiments conducted under contract by the U.S. Intelligence Agencies and Pentagon. They turned people into total vegetables and permanently destroyed their lives and memories of their histories with their loved ones just to learn how to do that on the microcosmic and then macrocosmic levels. Just look at the sick stuff the CIA had Donald Ewen Cameron and others doing to people:
- Operation Monarch, CIA Mind Control, depatterning, and psychic driving.
- CIA'S ROLE IN IRAN CONTINUED
- ASSASSINATION OF ROBERT F. KENNEDY WAS NOT ISLAMIC TERRORISM
- CHAPTER 100 THE SHADOW'S BIDDING: ASSASSINATIONS AND COUP DETATS: SUPPLEMENT: THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A CONSERVATIVE-REPUBLICAN CHRISTIAN: JESUS IS A SMALL-C COMMUNIST
- CHAPTER 8: EQUATING GOD AND COUNTRY: THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A CONSERVATIVE-REPUBLICAN CHRISTIAN: JESUS IS A SMALL-C COMMUNIST
- CHAPTER 2: CHRISTIAN CONSERVATISM: THE MOST SIGNIFICANT CONFUSION: THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A CONSERVATIVE-REPUBLICAN CHRISTIAN: JESUS IS A SMALL-C COMMUNIST
Do Internet searches on "Rita Zimmerman" "Linda MacDonald" "Ewen Cameron" ....
There is no polite way to put it. The multitude of Ewen Cameron types were and are monsters. They were and are demons from Hell. They were and are sociopaths in need of exorcism. Their brains are dominated not by the higher, most evolved, most enlightened parts but rather by the predator centers.
Then look at Abu Ghraib and all the secret prisons (dark sites, aptly named), etc. Then ask yourself if you believe that people sworn to secrecy and trained to lie (CIA) are telling the truth that they aren't engaged in any of this anymore and won't start up again. The pattern repeats and repeats and repeats. The only way to end it is to end the secret agencies altogether. Get rid of the Pentagon. Get rid of the war making. Get rid of the selfish system. Get rid of the harmful system. Get rid of the Central Banks around the world. Get rid of usury. Get rid of sexual selfishness and all selfishness from within you, everybody on the planet. That's the one and only way, and it's Jesus's, whether the Theosophists want to claim otherwise or not. They are completely wrong.
Now for my specific reply (perhaps too long for a comment reply to be placed on Morris's post page):
I believe, Morris, that there have been minds down through the ages and especially early that were certainly less distracted by all the racket of humanity. Reflecting was easier. Very early on, work wasn't required. Jesus alludes to this. Be fruitful, multiply, and kill and enslave each other was not what God said.
As for organized religion, it occurs to me that perfection and God are one and the same and perfection is perfectly organized. The incorruptible is not in disarray in the least. Therefore, we humans ought to be organized to the same end and in the same way. It is only the rebellious against what is truly best for one and all who over throw the peaceful garden. They are self-centered as opposed to being simultaneously one with the whole of humanity as one soul.
I understand that under the liberal interpretation of Sharia, Muslims do not force conversion. On account of ambiguity in the Qur'an though, there are dangerously aggressive and belligerent interpretations. There is also a higher taxation on other religions that is decidedly akin to protection money.
Now, I understand that one could argue that the "protection" racket includes then attacking those who won't pay, but once someone is outside the protection of Islam, he or she is fair game. Such is not the case in real Christianity. Frankly, it isn't directly allowed in Torah Judaism either. Membership does have its privileges though. The question is whether it is blood or spirit that is the deciding factor. In my book, they need to reconcile both blood and spirit for righteousness across-the-board.
The prevalent Talmudic is another matter though, as you've seen for yourself with hyper-racist "settlers" holding with a wicked Jewish fascism/nationalism that is hardly different in spirit from the Nazism of the "Aryan race." The racist rabbis behind that movement are covered over by the more cosmopolitan Zionists who know that such talk from those rabbis being widely exposed will turn the American cash-cow against the originally atheistic Zionist Project.
Isn't it amazing how so many Jews are killing their protector, America. What will they do when Russia, China, India, and the Arabs don't have to do what America and the European powers tell them anymore, Armageddon?
Sharia is coercive. Under that law, homosexuals are punished, often severely and even to the death; however under Christ, the law is written on the heart such that the individual refuses to engage in homosexuality on account of its unrighteous aspects - selfish; detrimental to both the individual and others. Under Jesus, one never resorts to wrathful violence on others. Jesus showed what will happen when wrath comes when he cleaned the temple, but hard-hearts can properly interpret that he was saying to do that within each heart so that it won't happen from without and worldwide.
There is no doubt that one could do worse than Sharia, and that in many ways, the decadence of the "Western" world is trying to probe the depths of depravity again as they did in ancient Canaan and elsewhere.
Aleister Crowley discussed in his writings how the eating of the flesh of ritualistically sacrificed innocent children imparted huge power to the devourer. Of course, he's speaking directly to those he wanted to convert to insanity that is called sociopathy (Satanistic).
Crowley and his Secret Societies crowd are much larger in number than the non-initiates and lower ranks are allowed to know.
The reason why the alarms of many calling themselves Christians are not sounding louder in the ears of the population in general is because many of those "Christians" cling to traditional hypocrisy. The histories of their denominations, the actual events of which they do not often repudiate, speaks to many who would follow after Freemasonry and other Luciferian (rebellious against the real enlightenment) offshoots. It speaks of how "Christianity" is riddled with inexplicable error. Rather than sorting out the diversion from Jesus Christ's walk on the part of co-opters who came later such as Constantine I, many simply want to through out Jesus's teachings and exemplary life altogether and start over. Why waste time though, since starting at the root cause of pain and suffering is exactly what Jesus calls souls to do already?
He clearly defines that this worldly world is upside down and that the pyramid needs to be leveled: First is last and all serve each and all, etc.
The only thing standing in the way is selfishness and the short-term and fleeting gain for self apart from the enhanced understanding of God (the God of Jesus) and at the direct negative expense of others who would otherwise be our real spiritual and fleshly brothers and sisters. I put homosexual behavior in that camp of selfishness regardless of how much they protest that some of their ranks "love" each other. That "love" comes bundled with damaging spirits or demons, if you will, and consequently is not pure love. "Homosexuals: What they ignore"
Lastly, alcohol can inflame if used to excess. If you look into wine though, you discover admirable qualities. To preclude it even in moderation is a call to not overcoming. It is akin to requiring women to cover head to toe. Only on account of allowing the devouring spirit to enter into the heart does the natural, non-sluttish; non-contrived, female form inflame men. In the manner of the words of Jesus, it wasn't always so.
We need to return to wisdom. This is what the Freemasons say too; however, their vision of what is wise is not one I share in whole. They believe that it is our destiny. Well, it is; but again, it is not wise to attempt to drag error into Heaven.
Thank you for the conversation between our two websites, Morris. I look forward to truly fruitful dialogue.
Peace, love, and truth,
Tom
- Technorati Tags: 9/11, aberrant behavior, Abu Ghraib, activist homosexuals, alcohol, Aleister Crowley, Alfred Kinsey, ambiguity, America, antichrist, anti-homosexuals, Arabs, Armageddon, Aryan race, assassination, assassinations, atheistic, banksters, Barack Obama, belligerent, Biblical, Bilderberg, Canaan, cash-cow, censor, censored, Central Banks, Chesapeake Bay, China, Christ, Christian, Christian conservatism, CIA, CIA Mind Control, competitive, confusion, conservative, conservative-republican Christian, Constantine I, corrosive, cosmopolitan, coup detats, dangerous, dark side, dark sites, debate, decadence, demons, depatterning, depths of depravity, destiny, detrimental, Donald Ewen Cameron, England, enlightenment, environment, European powers, evangelical, exorcism, family structure, fascists, female form, forced conversion, Freemasonry, fruitful dialogue, God, God and country, Google, Heaven, Hell, heterosexual, heterosexuality, higher taxation, homosexual, homosexual agenda, Homosexual Movement, homosexuality, homosexuals, hormonal balance, hypnotized, hypocrisy, ideology, incorruptible, India, innocent children, inside job, interpretation, inter-sexed fish, inverted pyramid, Iran, Islam, Islamic terrorism, Jesus, Jewish extraction, Jewish fascism, Jews, Judaism, liberal, Linda MacDonald, London, Luciferian, macrocosmic, marginalize, microcosmic, monsters, Muslims, nationalism, Nazism, Neturei Karta, Oklahoma, Oklahoma Federal Building, one soul, Operation Monarch, organized, organized religion, pattern, pattern repeats, Pentagon, perfection, plutocrats, predator, proper ordering, protection money, protection racket, psychic driving, Qur'an, rabbi, racist rabbis, rebellious, representation, Republican, right-side up, Rita Zimmerman, ritual sacrifice, Robert F. Kennedy, Russia, Sally Kern, Satan, Satanistic, Second Coming, secrecy, secret agencies, Secret History: Kinsey's Paedophiles, secret prisons, Secret Societies, selfishness, sex education, sexual, Sharia, sluttish, small-c communist, social fabric, sociopaths, sociopathy, superrich, Talmudic, terrorism, terrorist threat, Theosophists, Torah Judaism, trained to lie, U.K., U.S. Intelligence Agencies, ultra-orthodox, usury, war making, Western world, wine, wisdom, YouTube, Zionist, Zionist Project, Gender, LGBT, Sexual orientation, Social Issues, Religion/Belief, Ewen Cameron, fracturing, Central Intelligence Agency, YouTube Inc, chemicals, Karta rabbi, United Kingdom, Google Inc., activist

by...







Tom Usher
Standing Comment, all posts and pages:
To all homosexuals and their supporters, condoners, promoters, accepters, confirmers, and the like:
Unless you have something completely new that hasn't already been refuted, don't bother. It won't show up.
Rehashing what has already been refuted is a waste of everyone's time.
I'm not interested in casting pearls before swine, giving the children's bread to the dogs, or rebuking a forever scorner.
Learn or go away: There is zero wisdom in homosexuality. Homosexuality is wrong. Nothing any homosexual or anyone else can say or do will alter it. No one needs the Bible to know it either. It's prima facie. There's no such thing as an unrepentant-homosexual Christian. There never has been and never will be. That's the way of it. If you don't like it, change.
Do site searches on the various topics concerning homosexuality to determine if your "point" has already been handled. Currently, I provide three different search methods. The "WordPress" search is still the most thorough.
The same can be done regarding militarism, capitalism, coercion, and many other main issues and themes.
TREATMENT, RUDENESS, POLITENESS, OFFENSE, TRUTH
Many times over the course of this website's existence, I've had commentators complain about how I've treated them and/or others. Much less frequently has anyone taken exception to those commentator's comments. I assume that's because for one, I appear to be holding my own.
Often, I have raised the fact that Jesus called certain people "serpents." I've often also mentioned how he cleaned the temple with whip in hand, not that he used it on anyone. It certainly doesn't say that he did, and neither was he charged with it in the kangaroo court of the serpents who ended up murdering him by proxy just for, among other wonderful things, speaking out and speaking truth.
If I say that those who are engaged in serpentine behavior are the New Testament "serpents," then why take offense at my saying it rather than standing with Jesus and me about it?
If others don't like it that I treat others or them the way I have in this regard, why don't they take it up with the serpents and/or their own consciences and God?
If I wanted to catch flies, I'd use honey. I don't want flies on this level. Human beings aren't to be on the level of flies. If the truth is bitter as vinegar, then ask yourself why and learn to taste it as sweet but not sickeningly so. Why attack the message and messenger, as the serpents did, and become a serpent by so doing?
The issue is not "name calling" on some bratty, childish level. When Jesus said "serpents," he was not being as a brat. His level was completely adult to adults and children. He dared say that the children understood the clear and plain truth before the adults who, afterall, had been abused and socialized by the serpents. He still calls adults back. Those who hear him and know his voice (truth) turn around and do the other required things together as well.
What is it for a human being to be more serpentine or reptilian than what God initially gave? What was and remains Jesus's point? What is the reptilian brain versus the vastly higher human brain with its cerebral cortex and frontal and temporal lobes and specific areas of altruistic sentiments and abilities? What are those higher areas before they are damaged, before the communication pathways to them and between them are diminished by evil that is always some form of abuse? How are those pathways reestablished or created where they never were in this fleshly life?
The snake lays its eggs. The eggs hatch. The snake parent doesn't nurture or raise the offspring. It's every snake for itself. Human parents and family are not designed to be that way. Humans hand down the learning of nurturing. Many people get better training than do others, and many people have a greater aptitude for learning and predisposition for the higher and highest virtues. Many are less abused. People can change for the better and best though, no matter where the starting point. They only can't if they don't — if they reject it.
Snakes, of course, also come in venomous varieties and in strangling varieties, etc., such that they have been attackers and even devourers of humans for eons, guilty and innocent alike.
Now, Jesus knew that most people could relate to what were, and still are, largely considered "good" parenting skills and "good" "family" relations. He regularly used those concepts to get people to consider the wider implications for the whole of humanity. He did know that many would refuse. He let them go. He didn't demand secular or false-religion legislation to rein them in with threats of violence and imprisonment. He was not and is not coercive. Even his Church is a voluntary place to be.
What he still teaches (through the written words in the New Testament and as those connect with the Old and also teaches through the Holy Spirit he definitely sent as he said he would) is, among many other things, that "good" is vastly better than has been commonly accepted and that real "family" is everyone left after all the rest have rejected the higher and highest good. He raised the standards far above the Old Testament and far above the "modern" standard.
The American Empire and the American people in general aren't even touching the hem of his garment, let alone even attempting to stand upright and side-by-side with him.
I point out that Jesus was, and is, a Real Liberal Christian. He is the one who brought back this censored truth that is the light. After he had spoken it and lived it and was murdered for doing so, the censors set about to re-censor it and did. They couldn't put it out though — couldn't completely extinguish the truth. I wouldn't be saying it now again with all credit to God, just as Jesus, if they had been able to completely block it.
I point out that each of those terms ("real," "liberal," and "Christian," along with "Church") are actually redundant terms — synonyms that are so close that they become one. The term "liberal" here is not the common usage, which common usage is a deliberate corruption of the term. There is no harm in real liberalism. There is no vileness in it. There is only beneficence. "Real" may be understood as the opposite of false-hearted, dark side, and dead of the Holy Spirit. Christian is both real and liberal in those senses. To arrive at living, doing, being those full senses requires what Jesus lives, does, and is in the highest. Finally, the Church is the whole.
Who are they who want to drag it down, censor it, work against it, lessen it, ignore it, etc.? Well, who sides with Jesus and who sides against him? Did the serpents side with him then? Do they now?
We call war-mongers "hawks." We call "peacemakers" blessed and "doves." Why do the hawks not take offense at "hawks" but do take offense at "serpents"? "Hawks" is not yet as telling to the general public, but I must tell you that all hawks are serpents. Why do some say, "Greed is good" but take offense at "serpents"? I tell you there is no difference between the selfish and the serpents. Why do people take offense at serpents when they do not take offense at homosexuality? I tell you the homosexual spirit also comes out from the dark side. It is a choice. It is harmful. Many are abused with it. Many never overcome it. Their very brain matter is transformed by it. Then they claim it is good when it remains confusion and definitely wrong and harmful.
Many arguments were put forth in support of tolerance. I understood that Jesus "tolerated," as in he did not execute wrath but rather told the truth and let the blind follow the blind (blind to the truth) into the ditch of their own making. I have watched while the movement has been corrupted into condoning what was once only to be tolerated. I have watched further while it has moved from condoning to promoting even to the youngest children to get to them before the truth does. I have seen evil at work, and I sound the alarm. I face censorship and other negative reactions for it.
As the American Empire claims to be a light to the world, it murders innocent babies by Hellfire missiles fired from predator drones controlled by armchair, video-gaming serpents in uniform. It tortures those who are not even suspects. It spies on its own without even probable cause or reasonable suspicion. It lies its way into wars for spoils and control. It neglects its poor, whom it treads down for the sakes of the superrich — for the sake of the massive flow of mammon from the bottom up (no trickledown — trickledown is a farce and always has been). All is claimed to be okay in America though — that America is headed in the right direction — because soon, even "don't tell, don't ask" will be a thing of the quaint past and homosexuals may be able to sleep together and have sex in the barracks with the "blessing" of the Empire while they practice murdering the innocent for the sake of homosexual, greedy plutocrats who own them and who, in turn, are owned by the dark-side spirit named by God and Jesus as Satan.
Whose side are you on? I speak truth to warn. I don't tell the secular government what to do other than occasionally to say what at least would be less hypocritical within their fallen, unenlightened system. I do so for spiritual reasons. What I want is the Christian Commons.
Now, if you submit a comment:
What you write here against the Real Liberal Christian Church founded by Jesus Christ will mark you in the Biblical sense unless you show that you have turned and are repenting in time to escape the damnation of your own choosing. That's the way of it. Don't be tempted by the devil to stand opposed to the call of righteousness. Overcome such evil temptation. Help others to help yet others to come to righteous behavior through-and-through.
Check out how even after reading this, people will still take it out of context and twist it to an evil end.